Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prasugrel in subjects with moderate liver disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Prasugrel is a thienopyridine antiplatelet agent under investigation for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients with chronic liver disease are among those in the target population for prasugrel. As hepatic enzymes play a key role in formation of prasugrel's active metabolite, hepatic impairment could affect the safety and/or efficacy of prasugrel in such patients. METHODS: This was a parallel-design, open-label, multiple dose study of 30 subjects, 10 with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class B) and 20 with normal hepatic function. Prasugrel was administered orally as a 60-mg loading dose (LD) and daily 10-mg maintenance doses (MDs) for 5 days. Pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC(0-t), C(max) and t(max)) and maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) by light transmission aggregometry were assessed after the LD and final MD. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Exposure to prasugrel's active metabolite was comparable between healthy subjects and those with moderate hepatic impairment. Point estimates for the ratios of geometric least square means for AUC(0-t) and C(max) after the LD and last MD ranged from 0.91 to 1.14. MPA to 20 microm ADP was similar between subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and healthy subjects for both the LD and MD. Prasugrel was well tolerated by all subjects, and adverse events were mild in severity. CONCLUSION: Moderate hepatic impairment appears to have no effect on exposure to prasugrel's active metabolite. Furthermore, MPA results suggest that moderate hepatic impairment has little or no effect on platelet aggregation relative to healthy controls. Overall, these results suggest that a dose adjustment would not be required in moderately hepatically impaired patients taking prasugrel.

Prasugrel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in subjects with moderate renal impairment and end-stage renal disease.

OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) responses to prasugrel were compared in three studies of healthy subjects vs. those with moderate or end-stage renal impairment. METHODS: Two of the three protocols were parallel-design, open-label, single dose (60-mg prasugrel) studies in subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD; n = 12) or moderate renal impairment (n = 10) and matched healthy subjects with normal renal function (n = 10). The third protocol was an open-label, single-dose escalation (5, 10, 30 and 60 mg prasugrel) study in subjects with ESRD (n = 16) and matched healthy subjects with normal renal function (n = 16). Plasma concentrations of prasugrel's active metabolite were determined and pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were derived. Maximum platelet aggregation (MPA) was measured by light transmission aggregometry using 20 mum adenosine diphosphate as agonist. RESULTS: Across all studies, prasugrel's C(max) and AUC(0-t) were 51% and 42% lower in subjects with ESRD than in healthy subjects. AUC(0-t) did not differ between healthy subjects and subjects with moderate renal impairment. The magnitude of change and time-course profiles of MPA was similar for healthy subjects compared with subjects with moderate renal impairment and those with ESRD. Prasugrel was well-tolerated in all subjects. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in pharmacokinetics or PD responses between subjects with moderate renal impairment and healthy subjects. Despite significantly lower exposure to prasugrel's active metabolite in subjects with ESRD, MPA did not differ between healthy subjects and those with ESRD.

Common polymorphisms of CYP2C19 and CYP2C9 affect the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel but not prasugrel.

BACKGROUND: Thienopyridines are metabolized to active metabolites that irreversibly inhibit the platelet P2Y(12) adenosine diphosphate receptor. The pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel is more variable than the response to prasugrel, but the reasons for variation in response to clopidogrel are not well characterized. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between genetic variation in cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes and the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic response to prasugrel and clopidogrel. METHODS: Genotyping was performed for CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 on samples from healthy subjects participating in studies evaluating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses to prasugrel (60 mg, n = 71) or clopidogrel (300 mg, n = 74). RESULTS: In subjects receiving clopidogrel, the presence of the CYP2C19*2 loss of function variant was significantly associated with lower exposure to clopidogrel active metabolite, as measured by the area under the concentration curve (AUC(0-24); P = 0.004) and maximal plasma concentration (C(max); P = 0.020), lower inhibition of platelet aggregation at 4 h (P = 0.003) and poor-responder status (P = 0.030). Similarly, CYP2C9 loss of function variants were significantly associated with lower AUC(0-24) (P = 0.043), lower C(max) (P = 0.006), lower IPA (P = 0.046) and poor-responder status (P = 0.024). For prasugrel, there was no relationship observed between CYP2C19 or CYP2C9 loss of function genotypes and exposure to the active metabolite of prasugrel or pharmacodynamic response. CONCLUSIONS: The common loss of function polymorphisms of CYP2C19 and CYP2C9 are associated with decreased exposure to the active metabolite of clopidogrel but not prasugrel. Decreased exposure to its active metabolite is associated with a diminished pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel.

Cytochrome P450 3A inhibition by ketoconazole affects prasugrel and clopidogrel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics differently.

Prasugrel and clopidogrel inhibit platelet aggregation through active metabolite formation. Prasugrel's active metabolite (R-138727) is formed primarily by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and CYP2B6, with roles for CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. Clopidogrel's activation involves two sequential steps by CYP3A, CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and/or CYP2B6. In a randomized crossover study, healthy subjects received a loading dose (LD) of prasugrel (60 mg) or clopidogrel (300 mg), followed by five daily maintenance doses (MDs) (15 and 75 mg, respectively) with or without the potent CYP3A inhibitor ketoconazole (400 mg/day). Subjects had a 2-week washout between periods. Ketoconazole decreased R-138727 and clopidogrel active metabolite Cmax (maximum plasma concentration) 34-61% after prasugrel and clopidogrel dosing. Ketoconazole did not affect R-138727 exposure or prasugrel's inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA). Ketoconazole decreased clopidogrel's active metabolite AUC0-24 (area under the concentration-time curve to 24 h postdose) 22% (LD) to 29% (MD) and reduced IPA 28% (LD) to 33% (MD). We conclude that CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 inhibition by ketoconazole affects formation of clopidogrel's but not prasugrel's active metabolite. The decreased formation of clopidogrel's active metabolite is associated with reduced IPA.

Exenatide: effect of injection time on postprandial glucose in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: Exenatide is an incretin mimetic whose effect on glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes is currently under investigation. This study assessed the effect of injection time relative to a standardized meal on postprandial pharmacodynamics of exenatide in patients with Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Eighteen patients participated in this single-centre, open-label, placebo-controlled, randomized, six-way crossover study. Patients received subcutaneous injections of either placebo (-15 min) or 10 microg of exenatide at -60, -15, 0, +30 or +60 min relative to a standardized breakfast meal on six consecutive days. Serial blood samples were assayed for plasma glucose and insulin concentrations. RESULTS: For all exenatide treatments, incremental postprandial glucose area under the postprandial plasma glucose curve from zero to 6 h (AUC0-6 h) was significantly reduced compared with placebo. When exenatide was administered before (-60, -15 min) or with the meal (0 min), peak postprandial glucose concentrations were significantly decreased (P < 0.0001 for all treatments) compared with placebo. Post-meal exenatide administration (+30, P < 0.05; +60 min, P = 0.21) resulted in smaller peak glucose reductions and in some patients transient low plasma glucose concentrations were reported. Peak plasma insulin concentrations in the pre-meal treatments were significantly lower than placebo (P < 0.05 for all treatments), while post-meal dosing groups exhibited a trend towards higher insulin peaks compared with placebo. The most common adverse events related to exenatide were headache, nausea, dyspepsia and vomiting, and were generally of mild-to-moderate intensity. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, all exenatide treatments demonstrated reductions in postprandial plasma glucose excursions compared with placebo. Pre-meal and with meal administration of exenatide produced greater reduction of postprandial glucose excursions compared with post-meal administration. These data support flexible dosing of exenatide at any time within 60 min before a meal.

Inhaled micronized crystalline human insulin using a dry powder inhaler: dose-response and time-action profiles.

AIM: The aim of this euglycaemic glucose clamp study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics, glucodynamics, safety and tolerability of micronized crystalline human insulin inhalation powder delivered by a Spiros dry powder inhaler system in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Thirteen healthy, non-smoking, male and female volunteers [age 30 +/- 7 years; BMI 23.5 +/- 2.7 kg/m(2); (mean +/- sd)] with normal pulmonary function participated in an open-label, randomised, 6-period crossover trial. Each volunteer received four single doses of inhaled insulin (60, 90, 120, 150 U) on separate occasions. For comparison, each volunteer also received two of three possible doses of subcutaneous (s.c.) injected regular human insulin (8, 14, or 20 U). RESULTS: Serum immunoreactive insulin following inhalation of insulin peaked an average of 60 min earlier compared with s.c. injected insulin (P < 0.0001). Following inhalation, the time to maximum glucose infusion rate occurred an average of 70 min earlier than with s.c. insulin: 187, 129, 161 and 162 min vs. 227, 241 and 241 min (P < 0.0001). The dose-response relationships for serum insulin pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics were linear for both inhaled and s.c. insulin. Relative bioavailability (based on serum insulin levels) ranged from 11.5 to 12.2% for the four doses of inhaled insulin and relative biopotency (based on glucose infusion rates) was 10.0 to 16.5%, respectively. Dosing was well tolerated by all volunteers. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that inhalation of human insulin via a dry powder inhaler system provides a promising alternative route for administration of insulin.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of LY309887: a specific inhibitor of purine biosynthesis.

PURPOSE: In this phase I trial in humans the safety and pharmacology of LY309887 on a weekly schedule combined with daily oral 5-mg doses of folic acid were evaluated. BACKGROUND: LY309887 is an inhibitor of folate-dependent enzymes involved in de novo purine biosynthesis and has a broad preclinical antitumor activity. In murine systems, combining this agent with exogenous folic acid results in an enhanced therapeutic index. METHODS: This study was a single-institution, open-label, clinical trial of dose escalation with toxicity and pharmacokinetic parameters determined. The dose range studied was 0.5-4 mg/m2 per week x6 and then a modified schedule weekly x3 every 6 weeks. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities were of delayed onset and associated with hematologic, neurologic, and mucosal effects. Pharmacokinetic parameters revealed dose linearity for AUC and Cmax. Low circulating levels of drug persisted for over 200 h. Urinary excretion accounted for approximately 50% of the parent drug but was highly variable. The urinary excretion was near maximal within 24 h of dosing. CONCLUSIONS: The modified dosing schedule allowed repetitive dosing in patients. Further evaluation of the 2 mg/m2 per week x3 every 6 weeks with daily oral folate supplement as a potential phase II dose may be warranted.