Integrated clinical pathways with watertight, multi-layer closure to improve patient outcomes in total hip and knee joint arthroplasty.

The number of primary total hip and knee replacement surgeries is increasing primarily due to an aging population. There is also a concomitant increase in the number of complications which could be attributed to high variation in arthroplasty techniques, peri-operative methods and the absence of integrated clinical pathways (ICP) to mitigate risks such as surgical site infections (SSIs). The implementation of ICPs incorporating watertight, multi-layer closure could increase the preventative effectiveness against joint prosthetic adverse events. The objective of this review is to describe the ICPs implemented by one US facility to help address ten adverse events synergistically.

Health Economics and Outcomes of Surfactant Treatments for Respiratory Distress Syndrome Among Preterm Infants in US Level III/IV Neonatal Intensive Care Units.

OBJECTIVE: To compare length of stay (LOS), costs, mechanical ventilation (MV), and mortality in preterm infants treated in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) with beractant (BE), calfactant (CA), and poractant alfa (PA) for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS). METHODS: This study evaluated preterm infants born between 2010 and 2013 with RDS diagnosis, gestational age of 25 to 36 weeks, birthweight of ≥500 g, and age of ≤2 days on first surfactant administration. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate all NICU outcomes. RESULTS: Of 13,240 infants meeting the study criteria, 4136 (31.2%) received BE, 2502 (18.9%) received CA, and 6602 (49.9%) received PA. Adjusted analyses estimated similar mean LOS (BE 26.7 days, CA 27.8 days, and PA 26.2 days) and hospital costs (BE: $50,929; CA: $50,785; and PA: $50,212). Compared to PA, BE and CA were associated with greater odds of MV use on day 3 (OR = 1.56 and 1.60, respectively) and day 7 (OR = 1.39 and 1.28, respectively; all p < 0.05). Adjusted NICU mortality was significantly higher only with CA vs PA (OR = 1.51; p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Adjusted NICU LOS and costs were similar among BE, CA, and PA. Infants receiving PA were less likely to be on MV at 3 and 7 days, and PA treatment was associated with lower odds of NICU mortality when compared to CA.

Budget Impact of a Steroid-Eluting Sinus Implant Versus Sinus Surgery for Adult Chronic Sinusitis Patients with Nasal Polyps.

BACKGROUND: A corticosteroid-eluting sinus implant was recently approved by the FDA as a drug to treat adult patients with nasal polyps who have undergone previous endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) of the ethmoid sinuses. ESS is performed in an operating room under general anesthesia, whereby diseased tissue and bone are removed to provide improved drainage. ESS typically involves dissection of 1 or more of the 4 paired sinus cavities (maxillary, ethmoid, sphenoid, or frontal). The implant, containing 1,350 mcg of mometasone furoate, is inserted by a physician in an office setting and offers controlled localized release of corticosteroid to the polypoid sinus tissue. The implant has demonstrated significant improvements in clinical testing; however, little research has been conducted on its economic impact. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and quantify the budget impact to a commercial payer of using this implant instead of ESS in patients with nasal polyps after a previous ESS. Since essentially all patients with recurrent nasal polyps after ESS are patients with chronic sinusitis (CS) diagnosis, this study also identified patients with CS with nasal polyposis (CSwNP) for consistency with the patient population studied in clinical trials evaluating the implant. METHODS: A budget impact analysis was conducted from a U.S. commercial payer perspective over a 1-year time horizon with patients who received the implant or revision ESS. Primary outcomes of interest were annual total and per-member per-month (PMPM) direct health care costs. Costs were estimated using a decision analysis model, assuming 50% implant utilization as an alternative to revision ESS in eligible patients, with other levels (25%, 75%) also considered. The model utilized the results of a recently published analysis of 86,052 patients in the Blue Health Intelligence database, results from published clinical trials evaluating the implant, a literature review, and published Medicare national payment amounts. RESULTS: A commercial health plan with 1 million members could anticipate 1,000 CSwNP patients as candidates for receiving the implant or revision ESS. Estimated direct treatment costs for refractory CSwNP using only revision ESS are $11.03 million ($0.92 PMPM). If the implant replaced surgery in 50% of cases and if 63% those patients received a second treatment with the implant during the year, the estimated total cost savings would be $2.56 million ($0.21 PMPM). Cost savings associated with using the implant changed to $0.11 PMPM and $0.32 PMPM with implant adoption of 25% and 75%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In a large commercially insured U.S. population, annual revision ESS costs are substantial. Using the implant instead of revision ESS could result in considerable cost savings for payers at various levels of adoption. DISCLOSURES: This study was sponsored by Intersect ENT, which was involved in study design and manuscript review. Ernst and Imhoff are employed by CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services, which contracted with Intersect ENT to conduct this study. Ernst and Imhoff also report other financial support from Intersect ENT during the conduct of the study. DeConde reports personal fees from Intersect ENT during the conduct of the study, as well as personal fees from Optinose, Stryker Endoscopy, and Olympus, outside the submitted work. Manes reports grants from Intersect ENT during the conduct of the study, as well as grants from Optinose and Sanofi outside the submitted work.

Relapse outcomes, safety, and treatment patterns in patients diagnosed with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and initiated on subcutaneous interferon ß-1a or dimethyl fumarate: a real-world study.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate real-world treatment patterns, safety, and relapse outcomes of subcutaneous (sc) interferon (IFN) ß-1a (Rebif) vs dimethyl fumarate (DMF; Tecfidera), to treat relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). METHODS: A US retrospective chart review of 450 randomly selected adults newly diagnosed with RRMS who received sc IFN ß-1a (n = 143) or DMF (n = 307) was conducted. Patients were either (a) treatment-naïve, initiating first-line treatment with sc IFN ß-1a or DMF, or (b) previously treated, switching to sc IFN ß-1a or DMF. Two years' follow-up data were captured. Patient characteristics, persistence, and adverse events between treatment groups were compared using t-tests or Chi-square tests. Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare time to, and risk of non-persistence. Annualized Relapse Rates (ARR) were calculated using a robust variance Poisson model adjusting for covariates. Propensity scores were used to address possible selection bias. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve patients became non-persistent, most commonly due to an adverse event (n = 37). No difference was observed in time to overall non-persistence between sc IFN ß-1a and DMF patients. Among treatment-naïve patients, those receiving DMF had 2.4-times the risk (HR = 2.439, 95% CI = 1.007-5.917, p = .0483) of experiencing a discontinuation than patients receiving sc IFN ß-1a. Non-persistent patients receiving DMF had 2.3-times the risk (HR = 2.311, 95% CI = 1.350-3.958, p = .0023) of experiencing an adverse event at a given time point than patients prescribed sc IFN ß-1a. No differences in relapse risk or ARR between sc IFN ß-1a- and DMF-treated patients were observed. CONCLUSIONS: sc IFN ß-1a-treated patients had comparable persistence and relapse outcomes, and better safety outcomes vs DMF-treated patients across 2 years.

The Economic Impact of Levothyroxine Dose Adjustments: the CONTROL HE Study.

BACKGROUND: In general, hypothyroidism can be adequately treated with a consistent daily dose of levothyroxine. However, the need for levothyroxine dose adjustments is frequent in clinical practice. The extent to which levothyroxine dose adjustments increase the utilization of healthcare resources has not previously been described in the clinical literature. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of our study was to measure the effect of levothyroxine dose adjustments in terms of their utilization of healthcare resources including direct and indirect costs. A secondary goal was to identify any differences in patient characteristics that may be responsible for levothyroxine dose adjustments. METHODS: A retrospective medical chart review was conducted among patients of selected healthcare providers in the USA. Patients who were recently started on levothyroxine therapy (<6 months) were excluded to avoid situations that were more likely attributable to treatment initiation than inadequate therapeutic effect. Trained nurses extracted data from patient charts and electronic medical record systems for review. We analyzed the cost of resources consumed by the frequency of levothyroxine dose changes over 24 months: 0 dose changes (no dose adjustment group); one dose change, two dose changes, three or more dose changes (≥1 dose adjustment group). RESULTS: The study included 454 patients. Overall estimated resource utilization was higher per patient in the ≥1 dose adjustment group (US$5824) vs. the no dose adjustment group (US$3166) during the 24-month study period. When direct and indirect costs were combined, overall costs of care were greatest in patients requiring three or more dose adjustments (US$8220/patient). Patients in this cohort incurred 2.5-fold greater total costs compared with patients requiring no dose adjustments (US$8220 vs. US$3166). Among the 58 patients in the group requiring three or more dose adjustments, mean direct medical costs were significantly higher than in the patients requiring no dose adjustments (US$6387 vs. US$2182). Patients with at least one dose adjustment experienced a 40.3% increase in lost productivity vs. patients who had no dose adjustments (US$1381 vs. US$984). Loss of productivity was highest among patients with three or more levothyroxine dose adjustments. Among this cohort, there was an 86.4% increase in lost productivity vs. patients who had no levothyroxine dose adjustments (US$1833 vs. US$984). CONCLUSIONS: Patients experiencing multiple levothyroxine dose adjustments were shown to consume more healthcare resources, resulting in higher costs than those who required no dose adjustments. Each care episode contributed to lost time and wages with total estimated lost productivity escalating with increasing levothyroxine dose adjustments over a 24-month period.

Retrospective Study of Patients Switched from Tablet Formulations to a Gel Cap Formulation of Levothyroxine: Results of the CONTROL Switch Study.

INTRODUCTION: Medication changes involving levothyroxine-either dose titrations or switching formulations-occur frequently in patients with erratic thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels and persistent hypothyroid symptoms. We investigated whether switching patients from levothyroxine tablets to a gel cap formulation of levothyroxine might reduce dose adjustments and improve tolerability and efficacy outcomes. OBJECTIVES: Primary study objectives included quantifying the percentage of patients achieving TSH levels within a pre-specified range, median dose changes experienced, and the percentage of patients with improved hypothyroid symptom control after switching from levothyroxine tablets to levothyroxine gel caps. METHODS: A retrospective medical chart review was conducted among 99 randomly selected hypothyroid patients who were switched from a tablet to a gel cap formulation of levothyroxine. Patients were required to have been on levothyroxine monotherapy for ≥1 year prior to the medication switch. Data was collected for 6 months pre-switch and up to 6 months post-switch. RESULTS: Of the 99 patients studied, the majority (51.5%) experienced no documented change in TSH status after the switch (P < 0.0001). However, there was a decrease in the mean number of dose changes experienced (1.61 ± 0.96 vs. 0.73 ± 0.96; P < 0.0001). Improved hypothyroid symptom control was reported among 61.6% of patients (61 of 99; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The results of CONTROL Switch support a strategy of switching patients who may experience tolerability or efficacy problems with standard levothyroxine tablets to the levothyroxine gel cap formulation.

Value of Propensity Score Matching for Equalizing Comparator Groups in Observational Database Studies: A Case Study in Anti-infectives.

PURPOSE: Propensity score methodologies can reduce bias and confounding in nonrandomized studies, including pharmaceutical comparative effectiveness studies. An observational case study was developed to demonstrate the impact of propensity score adjustments on outcomes (ie, discharge status) of patients hospitalized for complicated intra-abdominal infections. METHODS: Two cohorts were examined: intensive care unit (ICU) (vs non-ICU) patients and tigecycline-treated patients (vs patients receiving other antibiotics). Discharge status was captured before propensity scoring. FINDINGS: The impact of propensity scoring on discharge outcome was greater when comparing ICU patients versus non-ICU patients than when comparing tigecycline recipients versus nonrecipients. IMPLICATIONS: Propensity scoring should be examined carefully to optimize its effects. Moreover, propensity scoring only addresses bias and confounding in nonrandomized studies that are attributable to variables contained within the dataset (ie, so called "observables") and not to other variables that may influence the relationship between outcomes and other independent variables.

Treatment for Multiple Acute Cardiopulmonary Conditions in Older Adults Hospitalized with Pneumonia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, or Heart Failure.

OBJECTIVES: To determine how often hospitalized older adults principally diagnosed with pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or heart failure (HF) are concurrently treated for two or more of these acute cardiopulmonary conditions. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: 368 U.S. hospitals in the Premier research database. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 65 and older principally hospitalized with pneumonia, COPD, or HF in 2009 or 2010. MEASUREMENTS: Proportion of diagnosed episodes of pneumonia, COPD, or HF concurrently treated for two or more of these acute cardiopulmonary conditions during the first 2 hospital days. RESULTS: Of 91,709 diagnosed pneumonia hospitalizations, 32% received treatment for two or more acute cardiopulmonary conditions (18% for HF, 18% for COPD, 4% for both). Of 41,052 diagnosed COPD hospitalizations, 19% received treatment for two or more acute cardiopulmonary conditions (all of which involved additional HF treatment). Of 118,061 diagnosed HF hospitalizations, 38% received treatment for two or more acute cardiopulmonary conditions (34% for pneumonia, 9% for COPD, 5% for both). CONCLUSION: Hospitalized older adults diagnosed with pneumonia, COPD, or HF are frequently treated for two or more acute cardiopulmonary conditions, suggesting that clinical syndromes often fall between traditional diagnostic categories. Research is needed to evaluate the risks and benefits of real-world treatment for the many older adults whose presentations elicit diagnostic uncertainty or concern about coexisting acute conditions.

Analysis of Diagnoses Associated with Multiple Sclerosis-Related In-Hospital Mortality Using the Premier Hospital Database.

BACKGROUND: We sought to compare mortality rates and related diagnoses in hospitalized patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), those with diabetes mellitus (DM), and the general hospitalized population (GHP). METHODS: Patients who died between 2007 and 2011 were identified in the US hospital-based Premier Healthcare Database. Demographic information was collected, mortality rates calculated, and principal diagnoses categorized. RESULTS: Of 55,152 unique patients with MS identified, 1518 died. Mean age at death was 10 years younger for the MS group (63.4 years) than for the DM (73.3 years) and GHP (73.1 years) groups. Age-adjusted mortality rates, based on the 2000 US Standard Million Population, were 1077, 1248, and 1133 per 100,000, respectively. Infection was the most common principal diagnosis at the hospital stay during which the patient died in the MS cohort (43.1% vs. 26.3% and 24.0% in the DM and GHP groups, respectively). Other common principal diagnoses in the MS group included pulmonary (17.5%) and cardiovascular (12.1%) disease. Septicemia/sepsis/septic shock was a secondary diagnosis for 50.7% of patients with MS versus 36.0% and 31.0% of patients in the DM and GHP cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MS had a shorter life span than patients with DM or the GHP and were more likely to have a principal diagnosis of infection at their final hospital stay. However, the database was limited to codes recorded in the hospital; diagnoses received outside the hospital were not captured.

Evaluation of Tigecycline Efficacy and Post-Discharge Outcomes in a Clinical Practice Population with Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The utility of tigecycline as compared with other antibiotic therapies in the treatment of patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) and the short- and long-term outcomes of a large cohort of severely ill patients were examined. We provide the first published data on post-discharge events for these patients. METHODS: Retrospective data for the cIAI cohort were obtained from a large clinical database. Patients aged ≥18 y were selected for inclusion based on hospitalization with a relevant diagnosis code and procedure code, and guideline-compliant antimicrobial therapy. Propensity scoring was used to reduce treatment-selection bias introduced by the use of observational data. Tigecycline patients were placed into quintiles based on propensity score and were matched 1:3. RESULTS: The final model based on propensity score matching included 2,424 patients: Tigecycline (n = 606) and other antibiotic therapy (n = 1,818). Treatment was successful in 426 (70.3%) tigecycline-treated patients and in 1,294 (71.2%) patients receiving other antibiotics. Similar treatment success occurred across all infection sites. Among survivors, treatment failure was associated with a greater need for all-cause re-hospitalization at 30 d and 180 d. No differences in cIAI-related re-hospitalization and discharge status were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Using propensity scores to match populations, similar outcomes were demonstrated between treatment with tigecycline and other antibiotics as expressed by treatment success, the need for re-admission, similar 30-d discharge status, and the need for re-admission at 180 d.

Comparative resource utilization and costs for patients with acute coronary syndrome managed with percutaneous coronary intervention and treated with clopidogrel or prasugrel.

PURPOSE: Results of a study of bleeding events and other inhospital outcomes with the use of clopidogrel versus prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are reported. METHODS: Demographic and clinical data on adults hospitalized for ACS, managed with PCI, and treated with clopidogrel or prasugrel during a two-year period were extracted from a large hospital claims database. Bleeding rates, hospital length of stay (LOS), and total hospital costs during the index hospitalization were evaluated. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 75,297 patients who received clopidogrel and 9,477 who received prasugrel. The unadjusted bleeding rates were 5.7% with clopidogrel use and 3.2% with prasugrel use (p < 0.0001). After propensity score stratification to adjust for selection bias, rates of bleeding events were not significantly different between clopidogrel- and prasugrel-treated patients (odds ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-1.02; p = 0.0949). The adjusted mean ± S.D. hospital LOS was 0.22 day lower (95% CI, 0.15-0.28; p < 0.001) with the use of prasugrel versus clopidogrel, and adjusted total mean hospital costs were $375 less for prasugrel-treated patients (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: After adjustments for demographic and clinical characteristics, rates of inhospital bleeding in patients who received prasugrel and those who received clopidogrel were not significantly different. The adjusted analyses showed that the mean hospital LOS was shorter and total mean hospital costs were lower for patients treated with prasugrel.

Perioperative Fluid Utilization Variability and Association With Outcomes: Considerations for Enhanced Recovery Efforts in Sample US Surgical Populations.

OBJECTIVES: To study current perioperative fluid administration and associated outcomes in common surgical cohorts in the United States. BACKGROUND: An element of enhanced recovery care protocols, optimized perioperative fluid administration may be associated with improved outcomes; however, there is currently no consensus in the United States on fluid use or the effects on outcomes of this use. METHODS: The study included all inpatients receiving colon, rectal, or primary hip or knee surgery, 18 years of age or older, who were discharged from a hospital between January 1, 2008 and June, 30 2012 in the Premier Research Database. Patient outcomes and intravenous fluid utilization on the day of surgery were summarized for each surgical cohort. Regression models were developed to evaluate associations of high or low day-of-surgery fluids with the likelihood of increased hospital length of stay (LOS), total costs, or postoperative ileus. RESULTS: The study showed significant associations between high fluid volume given on the day of surgery with both increased LOS (odds ratio 1.10-1.40) and increased total costs (odds ratio 1.10-1.50). High fluid utilization was associated with increased presence of postoperative ileus for both rectal and colon surgery patients. Low fluid utilization was also associated with worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: According to results from this review of current practice in US hospitals, fluid optimization would likely lead to decreased variability and improved outcomes.

Potential return on investment for implementation of perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy in major surgery: a nationwide database study.

BACKGROUND: Preventable postsurgical complications are increasingly recognized as a major clinical and economic burden. A recent meta-analysis showed a 17-29 % decrease in postoperative morbidity with goal-directed fluid therapy. Our objective was to estimate the potential economic impact of perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy. METHODS: We studied 204,680 adult patients from 541 US hospitals who had a major non-cardiac surgical procedure between January 2011 and June 2013. Hospital costs (including 30-day readmission costs) in patients with and without complications were extracted from the Premier Inc. research database, and potential cost-savings associated with a 17-29 % decrease in postoperative morbidity were estimated. RESULTS: A total of 76,807 patients developed one or more postsurgical complications (morbidity rate 37.5 %). In patients with and without complications, hospital costs were US$27,607 ± 32,788 and US$15,783 ± 12,282 (p < 0.0001), respectively. Morbidity rate was anticipated to decrease to 26.6-31.1 % with goal-directed fluid therapy, yielding potential gross cost-savings of US$153-263 million for the study period, US$61-105 million per year, or US$754-1286 per patient. Potential savings per patient were highly variable from one surgical procedure to the other, ranging from US$354-604 for femur and hip-fracture repair to US$3515-5996 for esophagectomies. When taking into account the volume of procedures, the total potential savings per year were the most significant (US$32-55 million) for colectomies. CONCLUSIONS: Postsurgical complications occurred in more than one third of our study population and had a dramatic impact on hospital costs. With goal-directed fluid therapy, potential cost-savings per patient were US$754-1286. The highest cost-savings per year were observed for colectomies. These projections should help hospitals estimate the return on investment when considering the implementation of goal-directed fluid therapy.

Opioid Medication Practices Observed in Chronic Pain Patients Presenting for All-Causes to Emergency Departments: Prevalence and Impact on Health Care Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is a significant health problem that affects an estimated 100 million American adults (aged ≥ 18 years). Chronic pain affects more individuals than heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and cancer combined. Chronic pain sufferers cost up to $635 billion annually in medical treatment and lost productivity. Opioids are commonly used to treat chronic pain, but their metabolic interactions with concurrently prescribed medications for concomitant disease burdens can affect potency and efficacy of pain therapy. Additionally, misuse of short-acting opioids (SAOs) for chronic pain versus breakthrough pain can create gaps in pain relief. These potentially suboptimal prescribing practices may contribute to the high economic impact associated with chronic pain.  OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of suboptimal opioid therapy and the associated health care costs resulting from these prescribing practices in real-world patients presenting for all-causes to the emergency department (ED).  METHODS: This retrospective observational database cohort analysis used the linked Premier-Optum database and included patients with ED visits from 2006 to 2010 having ≥ 60 days supply of opioids in the 75 days prior to the visit. Suboptimal prescribing practices were identified as patients with (a) drug-drug exposures (DDEs), defined as cytochrome P-450 (CYP-450)-metabolized opioids prescribed concurrently with CYP-450 inhibitors or inducers and/or (b) monotherapy with SAOs. Comorbid conditions and principal diagnoses were documented. Readmission rates to the ED and hospital within 72 hours as well as ≤ 30, ≤ 45, ≤ 60, and ≤ 90 days were computed. Total costs for health care were calculated, and reimbursement rates were normalized using 2011 Medicare severity diagnosis-related group (MS-DRG) and CPT-4 information. Nonparametric bootstrapping to adjust for patient comorbidities was applied to cost data. RESULTS: Of the 9,214 patients identified with chronic pain, potentially suboptimal medication practices prior to the index ED visit were found for 8,539 (92.6%) patients. These appeared to be corrected in 345 (4.0%) patients before leaving the ED. Of 675 (7.3%) patients without prior DDE or exclusive use of SAOs, 345 (51.1%) patients were discharged with one of these. Of the 8,352 patients who left the ED with DDE or exclusive use of SAOs, 1,525 (18.3%) left with a DDE without exclusive SAO use; 4,812 (57.6%) left with both DDE and exclusive SAO use; and 2,015 (24.1%) left with only exclusive SAO use. Only 862 (9.3%) patients from the entire cohort left the ED without DDE or exclusive SAO use. Patients identified with suboptimal opioid use were aged 50 ± 13.5 years and were predominantly female (64.0%). Hypertension (44.0%), fluid and electrolyte disorders (32.7%), chronic pulmonary disease (22.8%), depression (19.6%), diabetes without chronic complications (16.2%), and drug abuse (15.6%) were the most prevalent comorbid conditions identified. The most prevalent principal diagnoses involved symptoms and signs of ill-defined conditions (36.5%), injury and poisoning (18.2%), and diseases of the musculoskeletal system (13.2%). The majority of revisits to the ED and hospital admissions occurred within 72 hours (73.6%) of the index visit and within 30 days (70%), respectively. When adjusted total costs were compared for all patients whose opioid use included DDE versus those without, a significantly greater cost (P less than 0.05) was observed at every time period except ≤ 72 hours. Respective mean increases in costs were $581, $689, $773, and $1,275 at 30, 45, 60, and 90 days. Exclusive SAO use with or without DDE resulted in a significant increase (P less than 0.05) in mean costs at all times: $214 at 72 hours; $836 at 30 days; $1,023 at 45 days; $1,022 at 60 days; and $1,536 at 90 days.  CONCLUSIONS: This study identified potentially suboptimal opioid prescribing practices in a real-world population presenting for all-causes to the ED. The observed rate of ED revisits and inpatient admissions in these patients was associated with increased health care costs. These findings suggest that the ED has the future potential to serve as an ideal setting to identify and correct such practices, thereby improving patient care and reducing resource use and beneficiary costs.

Patient Outcomes on Day 4 of Intravenous Antibiotic Therapy in Non-Intensive Care Unit Hospitalized Adults With Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality especially in hospitalized patients. In place of clinical end points traditionally used to evaluate antimicrobial efficacy for its treatment, Food and Drug Administration guidelines now require all registration trials to assess clinical response at day 4. The primary objective of this study was to assess health outcomes (length of stay [LOS] and hospital charges) between responders and nonresponders at this time point. METHODS: The Premier database was used to identify adult patients from 4 participating hospitals with a principal diagnosis of CABP (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes 481, 482.0, 483.8, 484.3, 484.5, 485, 486, or 487.0) hospitalized between July 1, 2010, and June 30, 2011. Only non-intensive care unit patients with hospital stays exceeding 2 days and receiving intravenous antibiotic agents within 24 hours of admission were included. After institutional review board approvals, a retrospective chart review extracted data for patient demographics, clinical efficacy variables at day 4, LOS, and total hospital charges. Data analysis included multivariable gamma regression models to control for patient demographics and clinical differences between responders and nonresponders. RESULTS: A total of 666 patients met study the criteria. Mean (SD) age was 70.7 (17.9) years, and 42.5% were males. Among these patients, 277 (41.6%) achieved clinical response by day 4 of initial antibiotic therapy. The unadjusted mean (SD) LOS was 6.3 (2.8) days for responders and 7.4 (5.6) days for nonresponders (P = 0.0009). Respective unadjusted total hospital charges were $22,827 (SD, $17,724) and $26,403 ($36,882) (P = 0.0031). Adjusted for demographics and clinical factors, nonresponders compared with responders had an increased LOS of 0.9 days (8.4 vs 7.5 days; P = 0.0008), resulting in associated charges of approximately $2500 ($34,139 vs $36,629; P = 0.0768). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world chart study, less than half of hospitalized patients with CABP achieved clinical response at day 4 of initial intravenous antibiotic therapy. The observed clinical response was associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay and trended toward lower total hospital charges. These findings corroborate the Food and Drug Administration guidance for assessing antimicrobial therapy at day 4 because responder is associated with improved health outcomes.

Differences in resource utilization between patients with diabetes receiving glycemia-targeted specialized nutrition vs standard nutrition formulas in U.S. hospitals.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to compare patient outcomes and costs for patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) receiving glycemia-targeted specialized nutrition (GTSN) with similar patients receiving standard nutrition (STDN) formulas during acute care hospitalizations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was designed as a retrospective analysis over a 10-year period (2000-2009) of clinical and cost data from 125,000 hospital inpatient episodes in the Premier Research Database. Patients received either GTSN or STDN, by tube or orally, as a component of comprehensive care for hyperglycemia in patients with DM. To adjust for potential cohort imbalances, GTSN patients were matched with STDN patients on the basis of propensity scores, adjusting for many characteristics, including age, sex, race, All Patient Refined Diagnosis-Related Group (APR-DRG) illness severity, APR-DRG mortality risk, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Tube-fed patients with DM who were provided GTSN had a 0.88-day (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-1.02) shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) on average compared with those patients provided STDN. Orally fed patients with DM who were provided GTSN had a 0.17-day (95% CI, 0.14-0.21) shorter LOS than did those patients provided STDN. The shorter LOS associated with GTSN contributed to a cost savings of $2586 for tube-fed patients and $1356 for orally fed patients. CONCLUSIONS: The use of GTSN feeding formulas for patients with DM in acute care hospital settings was associated with reduced LOS and inpatient hospital episode cost in comparison to STDN.

Real-world observations with prasugrel compared to clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: To compare 30 and 90 day real-world acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and bleeding related rehospitalization rates in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; ACS-PCI) treated with clopidogrel or prasugrel. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using the Premier hospital database, ACS-PCI patients receiving a drug-eluting (DES) or bare-metal (BMS) stent and clopidogrel or prasugrel from July 2009 to June 2011 were analyzed. Patients were included based on the prasugrel US prescribing information (USPI), excluding patients with a history of transient ischemic attack/stroke and patients ≥75 years without diabetes or prior MI. The primary endpoint was 30 day adjusted AMI rehospitalization rate. Secondary endpoints included 90 day AMI and 30 and 90 day bleeding-related rehospitalization rates. Treatment comparisons were adjusted using propensity score stratification. RESULTS: At the index event, prasugrel patients (N = 9404) differed from clopidogrel patients (N = 74,163) by having a lower risk of comorbid conditions associated with bleeding, being more likely younger and male, having ST-elevation MI and receiving a DES. For clopidogrel and prasugrel, respectively, the observed AMI-related rehospitalization rates were 4.7% and 3.9% at 30 days (p < 0.0001) and 6.3% and 5.1% at 90 days (p < 0.0001). After adjustment, prasugrel was associated with ∼10% lower odds of AMI-related rehospitalization (30 days: OR = 0.892 [95% CI: 0.798, 0.998]; 90 days, OR = 0.901 [95% CI: 0.817, 0.994]). Adjusted bleeding-related rehospitalization rates were similar to each other (OR = 1.035 at 30 days [95% CI: 0.765, 1.399]; OR = 0.922 at 90 days [95% CI: 0.725, 1.172]). STUDY LIMITATIONS: Treatment adherence was not assessed. Bleeding events not resulting in a hospitalization (e.g. office, outpatient, or emergency room visits), deaths outside the hospital, or readmissions to a hospital outside of the Premier alliance were not captured in the database. CONCLUSIONS: The different patient characteristics between prasugrel- and clopidogrel-treated patients suggest physicians are more selective in choosing patients for prasugrel than recommended in the prasugrel USPI. However, after adjustment for these differences, 30 and 90 day AMI rehospitalization rates were lower for prasugrel-treated patients compared to clopidogrel-treated patients, with no difference in adjusted bleeding-related rehospitalization rates.

Comparison of hospital length of stay, costs, and readmissions of alteplase versus catheter replacement among patients with occluded central venous catheters.

BACKGROUND: Central venous catheter (CVC) occlusion is common, affecting 30% of all CVCs. OBJECTIVE: To compare length of stay (LOS), costs, and readmissions associated with the use of alteplase to clear catheter blockage to outcomes associated with catheter replacement. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study utilizing a large hospital database. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized patients treated for catheter occlusion from January 2006 to December 2011. MAIN MEASURES: Univariate analyses of patient characteristics and treatment patterns and multivariable regression analyses of postocclusion hospital costs, LOS, and 30- and 90-day readmissions were conducted. KEY RESULTS: We included 34,579 patients treated for a CVC occlusion by replacement (N=1028) or by alteplase (2 mg) administration (N=33,551). Patients receiving alteplase were somewhat younger than those having catheter replacement (60 ± 19 vs 62 ± 20 years old, P=0.0002). After adjusting for patient and hospital factors via regression modeling, average daily postocclusion costs were $317 lower for alteplase recipients than for catheter replacement patients (95% confidence interval [CI]: 238.22-392.24; P<0.0001). Adjusted total postocclusion costs were $1419 lower for alteplase recipients versus patients receiving catheter replacement (95% CI: 307.27-2458.12; P=0.0121). Postocclusion operating room/surgery, radiology, and supply costs were significantly lower for alteplase recipients (P<0.001). Average adjusted postocclusion LOS was similar for both groups (P>0.05). Odds of readmission were not significantly different at 30 or 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients treated for an occluded CVC, alteplase-treated patients had lower daily and total postocclusion costs than patients receiving catheter replacement. Cost differences were mainly driven by lower operating room/surgery, radiology, and supplier costs.

Hospital readmissions following initiation of nebulized arformoterol tartrate or nebulized short-acting beta-agonists among inpatients treated for COPD.

BACKGROUND: Inpatient admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) represent a significant economic burden, accounting for over half of direct medical costs. Reducing 30-day readmissions could save health care resources while improving patient care. Recently, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act authorized reduced Medicare payments to hospitals with excess readmissions for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia. Starting in October 2014, hospitals will also be penalized for excess COPD readmissions. This retrospective database study investigated whether use of arformoterol, a nebulized long-acting beta agonist, during an inpatient admission, had different 30-day all-cause readmission rates compared with treatment using nebulized short-acting beta agonists (SABAs, albuterol, or levalbuterol). METHODS: A US nationally representative hospital database was used to study adults aged ≥40 years, discharged between January, 2006 and March, 2010, and with a diagnosis of COPD. Patients receiving arformoterol on ≥80% of days following treatment initiation were compared with patients receiving a nebulized SABA during hospitalization. Arformoterol and nebulized SABA patients were matched (1:2) for age, sex, severity of inpatient admission, and primary/secondary COPD diagnosis. Logistic regression compared the odds of readmission while adjusting for age, sex, race, admission type, severity, primary/secondary diagnosis, other respiratory medication use, respiratory therapy use, oxygen use, hospital size, and teaching status. RESULTS: This retrospective study compared 812 arformoterol patients and 1,651 nebulized SABA patients who were discharged from their initial COPD hospital admission. An intensive care unit stay was more common among arformoterol patients (32.1% versus 18.4%, P<0.001), suggesting more severe symptoms during the initial admission. The observed readmission rate was significantly lower for arformoterol patients than for nebulized SABA patients (8.7% versus 11.9%, P=0.017), as were the adjusted odds of readmission (odds ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.51-0.92). CONCLUSION: All-cause 30-day readmission rates were significantly lower for arformoterol patients than nebulized SABA patients, both before and after adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics.