Device comparison study to measure nasal nitric oxide in relation to primary ciliary dyskinesia.

Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a genetic respiratory disease characterized by chronic cough, recurrent respiratory infections, and rhinosinusitis. The measurement of nasal nitric oxide (nNO) against resistance has been suggested as a sensitive screening method. However, current recommendations argue for the use of expensive, chemiluminescence devices to measure nNO. This study aimed to compare nNO measurement using three different devices in distinguishing PCD patients from healthy controls and cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and to evaluate their diagnostic precision. The study included 16 controls, 16 PCD patients, and 12 CF patients matched for age and sex. nNO measurements were performed using a chemiluminescence device (Eco Medics CLD 88sp), and two devices based on electrochemical sensors (Medisoft FeNO+ and NIOX Vero) following standardized guidelines. Correlation estimation, Bland-Altman, ROC curve, and one-way ANOVA were used to assess device differences and diagnostic performance. Significantly lower nNO output values were observed in PCD and CF patients compared to controls during exhalation against resistance. The correlation analysis showed high agreement among the three devices. ROC curve analysis demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity at different cut-off values for all devices in distinguishing PCD patients from controls (optimal cut-offs: EcoMedics 73, Medisoft 92 and NIOX 87 (nl min-1)). Higher nNO output values were obtained with the Medisoft and NIOX devices as compared to the EcoMedics device, with a bias of-19 nl min-1(95% CI: -73-35) and -21 nl min-1(-73-31) accordingly. These findings indicate that all three tested devices can potentially serve as diagnostic tools for PCD if device specific cut-off values are used. This last-mentioned aspect warrants further studies and consideration in defining optimal cut-offs for individual device.

A longitudinal study of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and laryngeal obstruction in high school athletes.

BACKGROUND: Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) and exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) are common in elite athletes. Knowledge of which factors are related to incident EIB and EILO is limited. The aim of this study was to explore the course of EIB and EILO in adolescent athletes over a 2 years period and baseline characteristics related to incident EIB. METHODS: Questionnaire data on respiratory symptoms, asthma, and aeroallergy and results of objective EIB and EILO tests were collected from 58 participants (27 tested for EILO) at baseline and after 2 years (follow-up). Associations between incident EIB and baseline asthma-like symptoms, exercise-induced symptoms, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), aeroallergy, and sex were assessed using logistic regression models. RESULTS: Ten participants had incident EIB, and eight participants had persistent EIB. Five were EIB positive at baseline but negative at follow-up, while 35 participants were EIB negative at both time points. Having incident EIB was associated with reporting waking up with chest tightness (OR = 4.38; 95% CI: 1.06, 22.09). Reporting an increased number of asthma-like symptoms increased the likelihood of incident EIB (OR = 2.78; 95% CI: 1.16, 6.58). No associations were found between exercise-induced symptoms, FeNO, aeroallergy, or sex and incident EIB. Incident EILO was found in three and persistent EILO in two of the 27 participants tested. CONCLUSION: Two in nine had incident EIB and one eighth had incident EILO, suggesting that recurrent testing for EIB and EILO may be relevant in young athletes. Particularly, EIB-negative athletes reporting multiple asthma-like symptoms could benefit from recurrent EIB testing.

Prevalence of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and laryngeal obstruction in adolescent athletes.

OBJECTIVES: To study the prevalence of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) and exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) in adolescent athletes. METHODS: All adolescents (n = 549) attending first year at a sports high school in 2016 and 2017, were invited to answer a questionnaire on respiratory symptoms. The 367 responding participants were divided into two groups based on whether they reported exercise-induced dyspnea (dyspnea group) or not (nondyspnea group). Randomly selected participants in each group were invited to undergo two standardized exercise tests, an EIB test and a continuous laryngoscopy exercise (CLE) test, to investigate EILO. RESULTS: In total, 98 participants completed an EIB test, 75 of whom also completed a CLE test. Positive EIB tests: eight of 41 in the dyspnea group and 16 of 57 in the nondyspnea group. Positive CLE tests: 5 of 34 in the dyspnea group and three of 41 in the nondyspnea group. The estimated prevalence of EIB was 23.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.5-33.8) and of EILO 8.1% (95% CI: 2.5-18.5) in the whole study population. No differences in prevalence of EIB or EILO were found between the dyspnea and the nondyspnea groups. CONCLUSION: EIB was highly prevalent in this cohort of adolescent athletes. EILO was less prevalent, but represents an important differential diagnosis to EIB. Self-reported exercise-induced dyspnea is a weak indicator for both EIB and EILO and standardized testing should be provided.