Minimal infectious dose and dynamics of Babesia microti parasitemia in a murine model.

BACKGROUND: Babesia microti is a parasite that infects red blood cells (RBCs) in mammals. It is transmitted to humans by tick bites, transfusion, organ transplantation, and congenital acquisition. Although the Babesia natural history and seroprevalence in donors have been well described, gaps in knowledge relevant to transfusion remain. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Mice were infected with dilutions of parasitized blood to address the minimal infectious dose and the kinetics of parasitemia by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and of antibodies by enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: In immunocompetent DBA/2 mice infected with 100 parasitized RBCs (pRBCs) and in immunodeficient NSG mice infected with 63 pRBCs, parasitemia was detectable in five of five mice each. Peak parasitemia up to 2 × 107 pRBCs/mL at 2 to 3 weeks or 5 × 108 pRBCs/mL at 6 weeks was observed for DBA/2 and NSG mice, respectively. Protracted fluctuating parasitemia was observed for 8 months in DBA/2 mice, whereas NSG mice exhibited a high-plateau parasitemia. Antibody titers continued to increase until 6 to 18 weeks in DBA/2 mice and remained high through 6 months. This study also investigated the analytical performance of Babesia assays that detect parasite DNA or RNA using a blinded panel. A Babesia assay targeting parasite RNA was approximately 10-fold more sensitive compared to qPCR targeting DNA. CONCLUSION: The mice in this study were highly susceptible to Babesia infection using as few as 1 to 2 log pRBCs and maintained chronic parasitemia. If the infectious dose in human transfusion recipients is comparably low, a highly sensitive assay targeting parasite RNA may safeguard the blood supply, particularly before antibody detection.

Serologic screening of United States blood donors for Babesia microti using an investigational enzyme immunoassay.

BACKGROUND: The tick-borne pathogen Babesia microti has become recognized as the leading infectious risk associated with blood transfusion in the United States, yet no Food and Drug Administration-licensed screening tests are currently available to mitigate this risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of an investigational enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for B. microti as a screening test applied to endemic and nonendemic blood donor populations. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study aimed to test 20,000 blood donors from areas of the United States considered endemic for B. microti and 10,000 donors from a nonendemic area with the investigational B. microti EIA. Repeat-reactive samples were retested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), blood smear, immunofluorescent assay (IFA), and immunoblot assay. In parallel, serum samples from symptomatic patients with confirmed babesiosis were tested by EIA, IFA, and immunoblot assays. RESULTS: A total of 38 of 13,757 (0.28%) of the donors from New York, 7 of 4583 (0.15%) from Minnesota, and 11 of 8363 (0.13%) from New Mexico were found repeat reactive by EIA. Nine of the 56 EIA repeat-reactive donors (eight from New York and one from Minnesota) were positive by PCR. The specificity of the assay in a nonendemic population was 99.93%. Among IFA-positive clinical babesiosis patients, the sensitivity of the assay was 91.1%. CONCLUSION: The B. microti EIA detected PCR-positive, potentially infectious blood donors in an endemic population and exhibited high specificity among uninfected and unexposed individuals. The EIA promises to provide an effective tool for blood donor screening for B. microti in a format amenable to high-throughput and cost-effective screening.

Determination of Babesia microti seroprevalence in blood donor populations using an investigational enzyme immunoassay.

BACKGROUND: Transfusion-transmitted babesiosis caused by Babesia microti has emerged as a significant risk to the US blood supply. This study estimated the prevalence of B. microti antibodies in blood donors using an investigational enzyme immunoassay (EIA). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A peptide-based EIA that detects both immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM antibodies to B. microti was developed and validated. Donor samples randomly selected from areas defined as high-risk endemic, lower-risk endemic, and nonendemic for B. microti were deidentified and tested using the investigational EIA. Samples that were EIA repeat reactive were further tested by B. microti immunofluorescent assay (IFA), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on red blood cell lysates, and peripheral blood smear examination. A random subset of 1272 samples from high-risk endemic areas was tested by IFA, PCR, and peripheral blood smear in parallel with EIA. RESULTS: Among 15,000 donations tested with the investigational B. microti EIA, EIA repeat-reactive rates were 1.08% (54/5000) in a high-risk endemic area, 0.74% (37/5000) in a lower-risk area, and 0.40% (20/5000) in a nonendemic area. After application of a revised cutoff, these values were reduced to 0.92%, (46/5000), 0.54% (27/5000), and 0.16% (8/5000). Overall concordance between EIA and IFA among donor samples was 99.34%. One seropositive sample was positive by PCR. CONCLUSION: The seroprevalence of B. microti in blood donors in a high-risk area measured by an investigational EIA was approximately 1%. The EIA shows promise as an efficient high-throughput blood donor screening assay for B. microti.