Pediatric Device Clinical Trials Activity: 1999-2022.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the state of pediatric medical device (PMD) development by comparing PMD clinical trials to pediatric trials evaluating drugs and biologics, from 1999 to 2022. METHODS: The site www.clinicaltrials.gov was used to identify and quantify both PMD clinical trials and pediatric trials for drugs and biologics. Clinical specialty was also assessed. The institutions included were the 7 children's hospitals primarily affiliated with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Pediatric Device Consortia (PDC) grant program between 2018 and 2023. For a national comparison, an additional search assessed PMD trials across all US medical institutions. RESULTS: A total of 243 PMD clinical trials were identified at the FDA-PDC institutions on the basis of the year of initiation; the average number of PMD trials initiated per year per institution was 1.5 from 1999 to 2022. However, PMD trials significantly increased during the period 2014 to 2022 compared with 1999 to 2013 (P < .001); the rate of initiation of drug and biologic pediatric trials demonstrated no significant differences between these time periods. A national survey of all institutions initiating PMD trials, and drugs and biologics trials, identified 1885 PMD trials out of a total 12 943. A comparable trend was noted in the national survey with initiation of PMD trials increasing significantly from 2014 to 2022 (P < .001), compared with 1999 to 2013, whereas the rate of initiation of drug and biologic trials during these periods did not demonstrate a significant change. CONCLUSIONS: Although pediatric clinical trial initiation for drugs and biologics remained stable from 1999 to 2022, the rate of new PMD trials significantly increased during the period 2014 to 2022 at FDA-PDC institutions and nationally.

Barriers to and facilitators of paediatric medical device innovation: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: The development of paediatric medical devices continues to lag adult medical devices and contributes to issues of inequity, safety, quality and patient outcomes. New legislation and funding mechanisms have been introduced over the past two decades, but the gap remains. Clinical trials have been identified as a pain point, but components of effective clinical research infrastructure are poorly understood. As part of a multimodal research strategy, the Pediatric Device Consortia (PDC) will conduct a scoping review to better understand infrastructural barriers to and facilitators of paediatric medical device clinical research identified in the health sciences literature. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The following databases will be included for this review: Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science and IEEE Xplore. Additional grey literature will be sought out through Google Scholar and reviewing the citations of included studies. Included studies will discuss medical devices according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration classification, focus on the paediatric population (ages 0-21 years) and involve human premarket or postmarket research. All study types that were published in 2007-present in English, Spanish, French or Italian will be included. Using Covidence web-based software, two independent reviewers will screen the resulting titles, abstracts and the full text of potential studies. Conflicts will be resolved by the primary investigator during both phases. REDCap will be used for quantitative and qualitative data charting, generating data tables and narrative synthesis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This research did not require research ethics board consideration as it does not involve human participants and all data will be collected from published literature. We will share our findings through peer-reviewed manuscripts, clinical and research conference presentations and professional networks available to the PDC. STUDY REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/k72bn).

"100 Things I Wish Someone Would Have Told Me": Everyday Challenges Parents Face While Caring for Their Children With a Tracheostomy.

Equitable access to appropriate care, emergency department services, and in-home support aids are needed to minimize the occurrences of adverse events that have a significant impact on families. However, many families of children with medical complexity (CMC) lack consistent care due to issues of health inequity. We conducted 11 qualitative interviews with primary caregivers who were asked about their experiences of providing care to children who have a tracheostomy and are supported by multiple life-saving machines at home. Guided by ecological systems theory, we identified three themes that contextualize the lived experiences of the participants who expressed needs that arose from poor interactions within the mesosystem. Findings convey participant frustrations that result from insufficient support, ineffective training, and inadequate healthcare coverage. Although each theme is organized systematically to emphasize specific concerns within the mesosystem, together these themes emphasize the inextricable relationship between daily needs with systemic barriers to care. We provide a discussion of these needs with a broader context that also impacts the perceived quality of care among families managing the needs of their children who are supported by life-saving technology. By addressing existing challenges and identifying opportunities for improvement within the healthcare system, we seek to contribute to the collective effort of advocating for ethical systemic change on behalf of CMC and their families.

Opportunities for Regulatory Changes to Promote Pediatric Device Innovation in the United States: Joint Recommendations From Pediatric Innovator Roundtables.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this report is to provide insight from pediatric stakeholders with a shared desire to facilitate a revision of the current United States regulatory pathways for the development of pediatric healthcare devices. METHODS: On August 5, 2020, a group of innovators, engineers, professors and clinicians met to discuss challenges and opportunities for the development of new medical devices for pediatric health and the importance of creating a regulatory environment that encourages and accelerates the research and development of such devices. On January 6, 2021, this group joined regulatory experts at a follow-up meeting. RESULTS: One of the primary issues identified was the need to present decision-makers with opportunities that change the return-on-investment balance between adult and pediatric devices to promote investment in pediatric devices. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Several proposed strategies were discussed, and these strategies can be divided into two broad categories: 1. Removal of real and perceived barriers to pediatric device innovation; 2. Increasing incentives for pediatric device innovation.

Innovation at a Children's Hospital: Personal Protective Equipment Efforts During the Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected life for everyone, and hospitals, in particular have been hard hit. In this study, we describe our efforts to develop personal protective equipment at a children's hospital early in the pandemic. We convened an innovation working group to organize our efforts and respond to the rapidly changing situation. We describe our work in four areas: (1) plexiglass shields for the emergency department, (2) face shields for clinical providers, (3) breath shields for ophthalmology, and (4) flip-up safety glasses for nurses. The hospital's supply chain is now caught up with addressing many pandemic-related shortages. Nevertheless, through our multidisciplinary approach to reacting to the pandemic's urgent needs, we demonstrated agility to bring stakeholders together to maximize the use of scarce resources and build resiliency. We believe this method can be rapidly replicated as future needs arise.