Cardiovascular events according to blood pressure thresholds recommended by ACC/AHA.

AIM: The latest guidelines from ACC/AHA define hypertension at systolic blood pressure (SBP) 130-139 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 80-89 mmHg in contrast to guidelines from ESC/ESH defining hypertension at SBP ≥ 140 mmHg or DBP ≥ 90 mmHg. The aim was to determine whether the ACC/AHA definition of hypertension identifies persons at elevated risk for future cardiovascular outcome. METHODS: In a Danish prospective cardiovascular study, 19,721 white men and women aged 20-98 years were examined up to five occasions between 1976 and 2015. The population was followed until December 2018. The ACC/AHA definition of the BP levels were applied: Normal: SBP <120 mmHg and DBP <80 mmHg, Elevated: SBP 120-129 mmHg and DBP <80 mmHg, Stage 1: SBP 130-139 mmHg or DBP 80-89 mmHg, Stage 2: SBP ≥140 mmHg or DBP ≥90 mmHg. Absolute 10-year risk was calculated taking repeated examinations, covariates, and competing risk into account. RESULTS: For all outcomes, the 10-year risk in stage 1 hypertension did not differ significantly from risk in subjects with normal BP: The 10-year risk of cardiovascular events in stage 1 hypertension was 14.1% [95% CI 13.2;15.0] and did not differ significantly from the risk in normal BP at 12.8% [95% CI 11.1;14.5] (p = 0.19). The risk was highest in stage 2 hypertension 19.4% [95% CI 18.9;20.0] and differed significantly from normal BP, elevated BP, and stage 1 hypertension (p < 0.001). The 10-year risk of cardiovascular death was 6.6% [95% CI 5.9;7.4] in stage 1 hypertension and did not differ significantly from the risk in normal BP at 5.7% [95% CI 4.1;7.3] (p = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Stage 1 hypertension as defined by the ACC/AHA guidelines has the same risk for future cardiovascular events as normal BP. In contrast, the definition of hypertension as suggested by ESC/ESH identifies patients with elevated risk of cardiovascular events.

Until 2017, there was worldwide agreement on defining hypertension at systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 90 mmHg.In 2017, the American Cardiology Societies (ACC and AHA) lowered the threshold for defining hypertension at SBP 130-139 mmHg or DBP 80-89 mmHg.Lowering the threshold might make healthy persons sick if the thresholds do not identify persons at high risk.Unnecessary medical treatment is associated with high economic cost for the health care systems.We wanted to explore whether applying the American BP definition in a Scandinavian population identified persons with elevated risk for cardiovascular disease.As part of the Copenhagen City Heart study, 19,721 men and women aged 20-98 years were followed from 1976.They went through up to five examinations between 1976 and 2018 including BP measurements.We applied the American BP thresholds and followed the persons until death or 2018.In Denmark all citizens have a unique identification number which is linked to all health care contacts and administrative registers.We used advanced statistical methods and linked the BP measurements with the data for cardiovascular disease and death date from the Danish registries for each person.The results showed that the American definition of hypertension has same risk for future cardiovascular disease as the definition of normal BP.This means that healthy persons will be diagnosed with hypertension if the US guidelines were applied in Denmark.

Risk of stroke subsequent to infective endocarditis: A nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to investigate the associated risk of stroke after discharge of infective endocarditis (IE) in patients with stroke during IE admission compared with patients without stroke during IE admission. METHODS: Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified nonsurgically treated patients with IE discharged alive in the period from 1996 to 2016. The study population was grouped into (1) patients with stroke during IE admission and (2) patients without stroke during IE admission. Multivariable adjusted Cox proportional-hazard analysis was used to compare the associated risk of stroke between groups. RESULTS: We identified 4,284 patients with IE, of whom 239 (5.6%) had a stroke during IE admission. We identified differentials in the associated risk of stroke during follow-up between groups (P = .006 for interaction with time). The associated risk of stroke was higher in patients with stroke during IE admission with a 1-year follow-up, HR = 3.21 (95% CI 1.66-6.20), compared with patients without stroke during IE admission. From 1 to 5 years of follow-up, we identified no difference in the associated risk of stroke between groups, HR = 0.91 (95% CI 0.33-2.50). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with nonsurgically treated IE with a stroke during IE admission were at significant higher associated risk of subsequent stroke within the first year of follow-up as compared with patients without a stroke during IE admission. This risk difference was not evident beyond 1 year of discharge. These findings underline the need for identification of causes and mechanisms of recurrent strokes after IE to develop preventive means.

Echocardiographic Predictors of Mortality in Women With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies found that global longitudinal strain is a superior predictor of mortality in male patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (EF). This does not apply to women. Our aim was to investigate sex-specific differences in cardiac function and identify echocardiographic predictors of mortality in women with heart failure with reduced EF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Echocardiographic examinations were retrieved from 968 patients with heart failure with reduced EF (26.7% women). Images were analyzed offline, and the end point was all-cause mortality. During follow-up (median: 41 months) 163 patients (16.8 %) died. Women had significantly higher left ventricular (LV) EF (27.1% versus 25.4%, P=0.004), global longitudinal strain (-9.9% versus -8.9%, P<0.001), and global circumferential strain (-10.9% versus -9.7%, P<0.001). Moreover, women displayed higher E/e' (14.4 versus 13.0, P=0.004), LV diastolic elastance (1.16 versus 0.75, P<0.001), and lower e' (6.2 cm/s versus 6.9 cm/s, P<0.001). In women, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and LV isovolumetric relaxation time were significant predictors of outcome after multivariable adjustment (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion: hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.18; P=0.003 per 1 mm decrease; isovolumetric relaxation time: hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.10; P=0.001 per 5 ms decrease). LVEF and global longitudinal strain were significant predictors in men (LVEF: hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-0.99; P=0.014 per 1% increase; global longitudinal strain: hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.38; P=0.013 per 1% decrease). CONCLUSIONS: Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and LV isovolumetric relaxation time provide prognostic information in women but not in men. Hence, in women with heart failure with reduced EF, right ventricular function, and LV diastolic function seem paramount in predicting mortality, whereas LV systolic function is more important in men.

Cardiac implantable electronic device and associated risk of infective endocarditis in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.

Aims: Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) are at increased risk of infective endocarditis (IE) as are patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). However, few data exist on the IE risk after AVR surgery in patients with a CIED. Methods and results: Using the Danish administrative registries, we identified patients undergoing AVR from January 1996 to December 2015. Patients were categorized by CIED and non-CIED and followed up till hospitalization due to IE, death, 10 years after AVR discharge, end of study period (December 2015) or emigration, whichever came first. Using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard analysis with time-varying exposure, we investigated whether CIED was associated with an increased risk of IE. We included 15 538 patients (median age 71.4 years, 25th-75th percentiles 63.7-77.1, and 65.2% male). There were 890 patients with a CIED; 531 of these received their device during the AVR hospitalization and 14 648 patients with no CIED. The crude incidence rate of IE was 149.4/10 000 person-years in the CIED group and 74.3/10 000 person-years in the non-CIED group. Overall, CIED was associated with an increased risk of IE (hazard ratio 1.66, 95% confidence interval 1.27-2.17). There was no difference in associated IE according to the timing of CIED (P for interaction = 0.21 for CIED implantation before vs. in conjunction with AVR surgery). Conclusion: Patients with a CIED who underwent surgery for AVR were associated with an increased risk of IE compared with patients without a CIED. The association was independent of the timing of CIED implantation (before or in conjunction with AVR surgery).

Whole-genome sequencing of bloodstream Staphylococcus aureus isolates does not distinguish bacteraemia from endocarditis.

Most Staphylococcus aureus isolates can cause invasive disease given the right circumstances, but it is unknown if some isolates are more likely to cause severe infections than others. S. aureus bloodstream isolates from 120 patients with definite infective endocarditis and 121 with S. aureus bacteraemia without infective endocarditis underwent whole-genome sequencing. Genome-wide association analysis was performed using a variety of bioinformatics approaches including SNP analysis, accessory genome analysis and k-mer based analysis. Core and accessory genome analyses found no association with either of the two clinical groups. In this study, the genome sequences of S. aureus bloodstream isolates did not discriminate between bacteraemia and infective endocarditis. Based on our study and the current literature, it is not convincing that a specific S. aureus genotype is clearly associated to infective endocarditis in patients with S. aureus bacteraemia.