Combined Liver-Kidney Transplantation in High Immunologic Risk Recipients: Kidney Graft Evolution.

BACKGROUND: Candidates for combined liver-kidney transplant frequently present pretransplant HLA sensitization in most cases related to elevated prior transfusion requirements. The urgency criterion and the evidence of the protective effect at the immunologic level of the liver graft open the possibility of carrying out the combined transplant in patients with an incompatible crossmatch. The single-center experience presented here describes the patient profile and kidney graft evolution observed in this highly sensitized group. METHODS: Descriptive study of a series of 4 cases of patients with positive crossmatch results who received a simultaneous liver-kidney transplant at our center. Demographic characteristics and clinical information were collected and detailed. RESULTS: Before the transplant, 2 patients presented HLA class I antibodies and the other 2 showed both class I and II. The post-transplant crossmatch result was negative in 2 of the 4 patients. All received induction with Thymoglobulin. In the 2 patients in whom the crossmatch remained positive, treatment with plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulins and rituximab was initiated, after which the crossmatch resulted negative. During follow-up, anti-HLA antibodies were monitored, with the presence of mainly class I antibodies with variable mean fluorescence intensity being detected in all but 1 patient. Renal graft function remained stable throughout the tracing without objectifying histologic signs of rejection during the first 6 months of evolution. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, combined liver-kidney transplant in sensitized patients with an incompatible crossmatching test has presented satisfactory outcomes. Close clinical and analytical monitoring is essential.

Early outcomes of kidney transplantation from elderly donors after circulatory death (GEODAS study).

BACKGROUND: Spain has dramatically increased the number of controlled circulatory death donors (cDCD). The initial selection criteria for considering cDCD for kidney transplantation (KT) have been expanded progressively, with practically no limits in donor age during the last years. We aimed to analyze the early clinical outcomes using expanded (> 65 years) cDCD in comparison with standard ones. METHODS: Observational multicenter study including 19 transplant centers in Spain. We performed a systematic inclusion in a central database of every KT from expanded cDCD at each participant unit from January-2012 to January-2017. Surgical procedures and immunosuppressive protocols were based on local practices. Data was analyzed in the central office using logistic and Cox regression or competitive-risk models for multivariate analysis. Median time of follow-up was 18.1 months. RESULTS: 561 KT were performed with kidneys from cDCD, 135 from donors older than 65 years. As expected, recipients from older cDCD were also older (65.8 (SD 8.8) vs 53.7 (SD 11.4) years; p < 0.001) and with higher comorbidity. At 1 year, no differences were found amongst older and younger cDCD KT recipients in terms of serum creatinine (1.6 (SD 0.7) vs 1.5 (SD 0.8) mg/dl; p = 0.29). Non-death censored graft survival was inferior, but death-censored graft survival was not different (95.5 vs 98.2% respectively; p = 0.481). They also presented a trend towards higher delayed graft function (55.4 vs 46.7%; p = 0.09) but a similar rate of primary non-function (3.7 vs 3.1%; p = 0.71), and acute rejection (3.0 vs 6.3%; p = 0.135). In the multivariate analysis, in short follow-up, donor age was not related with worse survival or poor kidney function (eGFR < 30 ml/min). CONCLUSIONS: The use of kidneys from expanded cDCD is increasing for older and comorbid patients. Short-term graft outcomes are similar for expanded and standard cDCD, so they constitute a good-enough source of kidneys to improve the options of KT wait-listed patients.

Kidney transplant from controlled donors following circulatory death: Results from the GEODAS-3 multicentre study. / Trasplante renal con órganos procedentes de donación tras parada circulatoria controlada: resultados del estudio multicéntrico GEODAS-3.

INTRODUCTION: Many European countries have transplant programmes with controlled donors after cardiac death (cDCD). Twenty-two centres are part of GEODAS group. We analysed clinical results from a nephrological perspective. METHODS: Observational, retrospective and multicentre study with systematic inclusion of all kidney transplant recipients from cDCD, following local protocols regarding extraction and immunosuppression. RESULTS: A total of 335 cDCD donors (mean age 57.2 years) whose deaths were mainly due to cardiovascular events were included. Finally, 566 recipients (mean age 56.5 years; 91.9% first kidney transplant) were analysed with a median of follow-up of 1.9 years. Induction therapy was almost universal (thymoglobulin 67.4%; simulect 32.8%) with maintenance with prednisone-MMF-tacrolimus (91.3%) or combinations with mTOR (6.5%). Mean cold ischaemia time (CIT) was 12.3h. Approximately 3.4% (n=19) of recipients experienced primary non-function, essentially associated with CIT (only CIT ≥ 14 h was associated with primary non-function). Delayed graft function (DGF) was 48.8%. DGF risk factors were CIT ≥ 14 h OR 1.6, previous haemodialysis (vs. peritoneal dialysis) OR 2.1 and donor age OR 1.01 (per year). Twenty-one patients (3.7%) died with a functioning graft, with a recipient and death-censored graft survival at 2-years of 95% and 95.1%, respectively. The estimated glomerular filtration rate at one year of follow-up was 60.9 ml/min. CONCLUSIONS: CIT is a modifiable factor for improving the incidence of primary non-function in kidney transplant arising from cDCD. cDCD kidney transplant recipients have higher delayed graft function rate, but the same patient and graft survival compared to brain-dead donation in historical references. These results are convincing enough to continue fostering this type of donation.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders after solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are a rare complication after both solid organ (SOT) and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). In this single center retrospective study, we compared clinical, biological, and histological features, and outcomes of PTLD after both types of transplant. We identified 82 PTLD (61 after SOT and 21 after allo-HSCT). The presence of B symptoms, Waldeyer ring, spleen, central nervous system, and liver involvement, and advanced Ann-Arbor stage were more frequent in allo-HSCT recipients. PTLD had an earlier onset in allo-HSCT than in SOT cohort (4 vs. 64 months, p < .0001). PTLD was EBV-positive in 100% of allo-HSCT, in contrast to 47% of SOT (p = .0002). Four years after PTLD diagnosis, median overall survival was 32% (95% CI, 22-48) and 10% (95% CI, 2-49) in SOT and allo-HSCT recipients, respectively (p = .002). In conclusion, the clinical presentation and the outcome of PTLD varies greatly depending on the type of transplant.

Practice guidelines for the emergency treatment of thrombotic microangiopathy. / Guía práctica de tratamiento urgente de la microangiopatía trombótica.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The term thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) involves a heterogeneous group of diseases that can be overwhelming or invalidating, with an acute development, characterised by microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia and thrombocytopaenia. Its management during its initial hours is essential to improving the prognostic of these patients. The aim of this review is to give recommendations about the optimisation of TMA initial treatment and to accelerate the aetiological diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We provide a practice guideline based on four steps for the initial management of TMA: diagnosis of suspicion, syndromic confirmation, emergent treatment and complementary tests. RESULTS: The detection of microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia (characterised by elevated reticulocytes, LDH and indirect bilirubin, negative direct Coombs test and schistocytes in peripheral blood), and thrombocytopaenia not explained by other secondary aetiologies confirm the syndromic diagnosis of microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia and thrombocytopaenia (MAHAT). These patients require admission to an Intensive Care Unit to initiate plasma exchange therapy as soon as possible, ideally within the first 4-8hours. Prior to this, samples for ADAMTS13 and complement study should be obtained. Finally, it is important to request the complementary tests necessary to have a correct aetiological diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to the agreed recommendations in this guideline will improve therapeutic results by facilitating cooperation between different specialists involved in TMA management.