Dopamine receptors D1 and D2 show prognostic significance and potential therapeutic applications for endometrial cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: Catecholaminergic signaling has been a target for therapy in different type of cancers. In this work, we characterized the ADRß2, DRD1 and DRD2 expression in healthy tissue and endometrial tumors to evaluate their prognostic significance in endometrial cancer (EC), unraveling their possible application as an antitumor therapy. METHODS: 109 EC patients were included. The expression of the ADRß2, DRD1 and DRD2 proteins was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and univariate and multivariate analysis to assess their association with clinic-pathological and outcome variables. Finally, HEC1A and AN3CA EC cell lines were exposed to different concentrations of selective dopaminergic agents alone or in combination to study their effects on cellular viability. RESULTS: ADRß2 protein expression was not associated with clinico-pathological parameters or prognosis. DRD1 protein expression was reduced in tumors samples but showed a significant inverse association with tumor size and stage. DRD2 protein expression was significantly associated with non-endometrioid EC, high grade tumors, tumor size, worse disease-free survival (HR = 3.47 (95%CI:1.35-8.88)) and overall survival (HR = 2.98 (95%CI:1.40-6.34)). The DRD1 agonist fenoldopam showed a reduction of cellular viability in HEC1A and AN3CA cells. The exposure to domperidone, a DRD2 antagonist, significantly reduced cell viability compared to the control. Finally, DRD1 agonism and DRD2 antagonism combination induced a significant reduction in cell viability of the AN3CA cells compared to monotherapy, close to being an additive response than a synergistic effect (CI of 1.1 at 0.5% Fa). CONCLUSION: DRD1 and DRD2 expression levels showed a significant association with clinico-pathological parameters. Both the combined activation of DRD1 and blockage of DRD2 may form an innovative strategy to inhibit tumor growth in EC.

Surgical treatment in older patients with endometrial cancer: A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Older patients (OP) diagnosed with endometrial cancer (EC) are less likely to receive an optimal surgical treatment compared with non-older patients (NOP). This undertreatment along with the presence of more aggressive tumours at diagnosis can explain the worse prognosis of EC in OP. There is limited evidence comparing perioperative outcomes between OP and NOP, and the benefit of applying complex procedures to OP is still controversial. The primary objective of the study was to compare intraoperative and postoperative complications between NOP and OP with EC that underwent primary surgery. Secondary objectives were to compare surgical management and survival rates. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-centre observational study including women undergoing surgery for EC between 2010 and 2019. Patients were classified according to age as NOP (younger than 75 years) or OP (75 years or older). Basal characteristics and surgical outcomes of groups were compared using Chi-square, Fisher's exact tests, student T-tests or Mann Whitney tests. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to evaluate survival. RESULTS: In total 281 patients underwent primary surgery for EC between 2010 and 2019 in our centre. At diagnosis, 184 patients were younger than 75 years while 97 were 75 and older. No differences were found in disease characteristics. Most of our patients (83,3%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. Pelvic (58,2% vs. 37,1%, p = 0,001) and para-aortic (46,7% vs. 23,7%, p < 0,001) lymphadenectomies were performed more frequently in NOP compared with OP. Rates of intra-operative (6,5% vs. 12,4%, p = 0,116) and post-operative (13,0% vs. 20,6%, p = 0,120) complications were not statistically different between NOP and OP, and neither was the rate of severe complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification (5,4% vs. 8,2% of complications grade III-V respectively, p = 0,387). The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate tended to be lower in the OP than in the NOP (74,8% vs. 82,5%, p = 0,071). Considering only patients in whom complete surgical staging was performed, OP presented similar DSS to NOP, with comparable complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: OP do not present a significantly higher rate of perioperative complications compared to NOP. However, they underwent fewer lymphadenectomies and tended to present poorer DSS. Further studies are needed to standardize the surgical management of these patients.

Nano-Based Approved Pharmaceuticals for Cancer Treatment: Present and Future Challenges.

Cancer is one of the main causes of death worldwide. To date, and despite the advances in conventional treatment options, therapy in cancer is still far from optimal due to the non-specific systemic biodistribution of antitumor agents. The inadequate drug concentrations at the tumor site led to an increased incidence of multiple drug resistance and the appearance of many severe undesirable side effects. Nanotechnology, through the development of nanoscale-based pharmaceuticals, has emerged to provide new and innovative drugs to overcome these limitations. In this review, we provide an overview of the approved nanomedicine for cancer treatment and the rationale behind their designs and applications. We also highlight the new approaches that are currently under investigation and the perspectives and challenges for nanopharmaceuticals, focusing on the tumor microenvironment and tumor disseminate cells as the most attractive and effective strategies for cancer treatments.

Neural plasticity of the uterus: New targets for endometrial cancer?

Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecological malignancy in Western countries and is expected to increase in the following years because of the high index of obesity in the population. Recently, neural signaling has been recognized as part of the tumor microenvironment, playing an active role in tumor progression and invasion of different solid tumor types. The uterus stands out for the physiological plasticity of its peripheral nerves due to cyclic remodeling brought on by estrogen and progesterone hormones throughout the reproductive cycle. Therefore, a precise understanding of nerve-cancer crosstalk and the contribution of the organ-intrinsic neuroplasticity, mediated by estrogen and progesterone, of the uterine is urgently needed. The development of new and innovative medicines for patients with endometrial cancer would increase their quality of life and health. This review compiles information on the architecture and function of autonomous uterine neural innervations and the influence of hormone-dependent nerves in normal uterus and tumor progression. It also explores new therapeutic possibilities for endometrial cancer using these endocrine and neural advantages.

Ulipristal acetate for the management of acute heavy menstrual bleeding without fibroids.

Heavy menstrual bleeding is a common condition among women of childbearing age. Although hysterectomy was the usual approach in acute cases in the past, other minimally invasive therapies or pharmacological alternatives, such as the levonorgestrel intrauterine device have shown to be highly effective. This case report presents the case of a pluripathological patient with acute heavy menstrual bleeding and severe anemia, who was successfully managed with ulipristal acetate, a selective progesterone receptor modulator. Bleeding control was achieved in 6 d without side effects, avoiding the need for surgery. This report suggests that ulipristal acetate could be useful in the treatment of acute uterine bleeding even in a structurally normal uterus without fibroids.

Laparoscopy during pregnancy: Case report and key points to improve laparoscopic management.

CASE REPORT: A 34-year-old woman in her 19th week of gestation was admitted to the Emergency Department of our hospital for acute abdominal pain. The patient was diagnosed with haemoperitoneum. Laparoscopy was performed and revealed acute bleeding from a crumbly superficial uterine vascular network. Haemostasis was achieved and both mother and foetus recovered well after surgery. A caesarean section was performed at 38 weeks, delivering a healthy newborn and revealing that the pregnancy had developed in a rudimentary hemiuterus. Laparoscopy during pregnancy is safe and feasible and can be performed in any trimestre of pregnancy with no differences in perinatal outcomes but, as intervention complexity increases with gestational age, laparoscopy during pregnancy should be performed by experienced surgeons To minimise surgical risk several recommendations should be taken into account: gravid patients should be positioned in a left-tilted supine position, trocar placement should be adjusted to uterine size and gas insuflattion of 10-15mmHg can be used.