Ex vivo venetoclax sensitivity testing predicts treatment response in acute myeloid leukemia.

The BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax has revolutionized the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in patients not benefiting from intensive chemotherapy. Nevertheless, treatment failure remains a challenge, and predictive markers are needed, particularly for relapsed or refractory AML. Ex vivo drug sensitivity testing may correlate with outcomes, but its prospective predictive value remains unexplored. Here we report the results of the first stage of the prospective phase II VenEx trial evaluating the utility and predictiveness of venetoclax sensitivity testing using different cell culture conditions and cell viability assays in patients receiving venetoclax-azacitidine. Participants with de novo AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, relapsed or refractory AML, or secondary AML were included. The primary endpoint was the treatment response in participants showing ex vivo sensitivity and the key secondary endpoints were the correlation of sensitivity with responses and survival. Venetoclax sensitivity testing was successful in 38/39 participants. Experimental conditions significantly influenced the predictive accuracy. Blast-specific venetoclax sensitivity measured in conditioned medium most accurately correlated with treatment outcomes; 88% of sensitive participants achieved a treatment response. The median survival was significantly longer for participants who were ex vivo-sensitive to venetoclax (14.6 months for venetoclax-sensitive patients vs. 3.5 for venetoclax-insensitive patients, P<0.001). This analysis illustrates the feasibility of integrating drug-response profiling into clinical practice and demonstrates excellent predictivity. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04267081.

Characterisation of healthcare utilisation and cost of haemophilia care in real-life: A 4-year follow-up study in Finland.

INTRODUCTION: Characterisation of outcomes and costs of haemophilia care in common practice settings is essential for evaluation of new treatment options and for developing clinical practices. In Finland, haemophilia care is mostly centralised to University Hospitals, but treatment practices and costs in adult patients have not been systematically evaluated. AIM: This study was designed to characterise healthcare resource utilisation and treatment costs of adult inhibitor-negative haemophilia patients managed in Finnish University Hospitals. METHODS: The study was based on a nationwide cohort, which consists of all adult haemophilia A (HA; n = 120) and B (HB; n = 35) patients treated in University Hospitals from 2012 to 2016. Patient characteristics and data on healthcare utilisation and factor replacement use were collected from medical records. Direct costs of care were evaluated based on wholesale drug prices and healthcare service utilisation with standard unit costs. RESULTS: Most of HA (79%, n = 96) and HB (84%, n = 31) patients received factor replacement therapy. The median annual bleeding rate (ABR) was low, at 0.8 for HA and 0.5 for HB, also among the patients with on-demand therapy. Over 94% (n = 149) of the patients had outpatient visits during the follow-up period. The mean total annual costs of treatment ranged from €2520 to €176,330. The highest individual cost was factor replacement therapy. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of centralising the management of care to University Hospital Treatment Centres show low ABR and lower treatment costs compared with earlier reports from other high-income European populations. Management strategies, including choosing the right therapy between prophylaxis and on-demand, has been successful in Finland.