RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Autonomic impairment is a hallmark of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). While there have been studies on general values for each index of heart rate variability (HRV) analysis in HFrEF, a systematic review comprehensively examining representative values in HFrEF is lacking. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to extract studies reporting representative values of HRV metrics in HFrEF. RESULTS: A total of 470 HFrEF patients from 6 studies were included in the review. In general, time and frequency domains were abnormally lower in HFrEF, portending a worse prognosis. In HFrEF, the mean or median value of the standard deviation of NN interval, root mean square successive difference, pNN50, and low-frequency power/high-frequency power were 40 to 121 msec, 19 to 62 msec, 1.3 to 14%, and 1.00 to 1.73, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this systematic review, most HRV metrics were found to be calculated from 24- hour Holter recordings and were lower in HFrEF patients with poor prognosis.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Autonomic dysregulation is observed in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Abnormal heart rate variability (HRV), a measure of such dysregulation, is associated with poor prognosis in HFrEF. It is unknown if novel HRV metrics normalize in the patients with recovered ejection fraction (HFrecEF) compared to persistent HFrEF. The aim of this study was to investigate novel HRV indexes in persistent HFrEF in comparison to HFrecEF METHODS: A standard 10-min electrocardiography measurement was performed in patients categorized in four groups: persistent HFrEF (n = 40), HFrecEF (n = 41), stage A HF (n = 73) and healthy controls (n = 40). RESULTS: All HRV indexes were significantly different between the four groups. Specifically, novel metrics, such as higher parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) index and lower sympathetic nervous system (SNS) index, were observed in the HFrecEF group compared to the persistent HFrEF group. In multiple logistic regression analysis, higher PNS index (odds ratio [OR] 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-3.49; p = 0.01) and lower SNS index (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.87; p = 0.002) were associated with HFrecEF. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the SNS index had the highest area under the curve (AUC), followed by the PNS index and mean heart rate for the HF phenotype regarding EF recovery (AUC = 0.71, 0.69 and 0.69, respectively). CONCLUSION: Myocardial functional recovery in HFrEF is associated with improved parasympathetic activity and reduced sympathetic activity, as reflected in the PNS and SNS indexes. These novel metrics can be potentially used to aid in identifying recovered versus non-recovered phenotypes in patients with HFrEF.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The interaction between the cardiovascular and respiratory systems in healthy subjects is determined by the autonomic nervous system and reflected in respiratory sinus arrhythmia. Recently, another pattern of cardio-respiratory coupling (CRC) has been proposed linking synchronization of heart and respiratory system. However, CRC has not been studied precisely in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (EF) (HFrEF) according to the myocardial recovery. METHODS: 10-min resting electrocardiography measurements were performed in persistent HFrEF patients (n=40) who had a subsequent left ventricular EF (LVEF) of ≤ 40â¯%, HF with recovered EF patients (HFrecEF) (n=41) who had a subsequent LVEF of > 40â¯% and healthy controls (n=40). Respiratory frequency, respiratory rate, CRC index, time-domain, frequency-domain and nonlinear heart rate variability indices were obtained using standardized software-Kubios™. CRC index was defined as respiratory high-frequency peak minus heart rate variability high-frequency peak. RESULTS: Respiratory rate was positively correlated with high-frequency (HF) peak (Hz) in both persistent HFrEF group (p<0.001) and HFrecEF group (p<0.001), while respiratory rate was negatively correlated with HF power (ms2) in the healthy controls (p<0.05). CRC index was lowest in the persistent HFrEF group followed by HFrecEF and was high in healthy controls (0.008 vs 0.012 vs 0.056â¯Hz, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: CRC index was lowest in patients with impaired myocardial recovery, which indicates that cardio-respiratory synchrony is stronger in persistent HFrEF. This may represent a higher HF peak (Hz)/lower HF power (ms2) and abnormal sympathovagal balance in persistent HFrEF group compared to healthy controls. Further work is underway to tests this hypothesis and determine the utility of CRC index in HF phenotypes and its utility as a potential biomarker of response with neuromodulation.
Assuntos
Eletrocardiografia , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Frequência Cardíaca , Volume Sistólico , Humanos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Idoso , Frequência Cardíaca/fisiologia , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica/fisiologia , Coração/fisiopatologia , Taxa Respiratória/fisiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Cardiotoxic chemotherapy is used to treat malignancies such as breast cancer and lymphoma. These treatments predispose patients to cardiotoxicity that can lead to cancer treatment-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD). The use of high doses of anthracyclines or in combination with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 antagonists is associated with a progressively higher risk of CTRCD. CTRCD is preceded by increased activation of the sympathetic nervous system and abnormal left ventricular mechanical deformation as measured by abnormal global longitudinal strain (GLS). Low-level tragus stimulation (LLTS) is a new, safe, noninvasive technique that offers great potential to reduce increased sympathetic activation and improve GLS. Here, we describe a study method to examine the effects of LLTS on autonomic balance and cardiac function in breast cancer or lymphoma patients treated with anthracyclines. METHODS: A first-in-human pilot, randomized, double-blind feasibility study will evaluate 104 patients (age >50 y) with breast cancer or lymphoma who receive anthracyclines with one additional CTRCD risk factor. Patients undergo 2 weeks of LLTS daily (1 h/d). Autonomic balance will be measured using heart rate variability metrics. Strain imaging using GLS will be performed pre and post-LLTS. Endothelial inflammation and oxidative stress measures will be performed using in vitro assays at baseline and after 2 weeks. CONCLUSION: We hypothesize that LLTS stabilizes sympathovagal imbalance and improves cardiac performance in anthracycline-treated patients with breast cancer or lymphoma.