Spontaneous spinal epidural haematoma: a retrospective study of a series of 13 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous spinal epidural haematoma (SSEH) has an estimated incidence of one per million inhabitants. It is classified as spontaneous when no identifiable cause can be linked to its onset. OBJECTIVE: To describe a sample of patients with SSEH and analyse variables related to its functional prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study carried out in patients diagnosed with SSEH between 2001 and 2013 in our hospital. RESULTS: We included 13 subjects (7 men) with a mean age of 71 years. Of the total, 62% had hypertension and 54% were treated with oral anticoagulants; of the latter, 57% had an International Normalised Ratio above 3. The most frequent manifestation was spinal column pain (85%). Nearly all subjects presented an associated neurological deficit, whether sensory-motor (70%), pure motor (15%), or pure sensory (7%). Five patients underwent surgical treatment and 8 had conservative treatment. After one year, 3 of the patients treated surgically and 4 of those on conservative treatment had a score of 2 or lower on the modified Rankin Scale. Poorer prognosis was observed in patients with anticoagulant therapy, large haematomas, location in the lumbar region, and more pronounced motor disability at onset. CONCLUSIONS: Old age, hypertension, and anticoagulant therapy are the main risk factors for SSEH. The typical presentation consists of back pain with subsequent motor deficit. In patients with established motor symptoms, surgical treatment within the first 24hours seems to be the best option.

[Effect of intensive treatment with atorvastatin versus standard doses of statins on the risk of stroke. A meta-analysis from five randomized trials including 25,709 patients]. / Efecto del tratamiento intensivo con atorvastatina frente a dosis estándar de estatinas en el riesgo de ictus de pacientes con enfermedad coronaria previa. Metaanálisis de cinco ensayos aleatorizados con 25.709 pacientes.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of intensive lipid lowering treatment with atorvastatin versus standard doses of statins (simvastatin, atorvastatin, lovastatin or pravastatin) on the risk of stroke, using meta-analytic techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The meta-analysis included 5 randomized trials that met the inclusion criteria: comparison between intensive atorvastatin treatment (atorvastatin 80 mg or target LDL < 70 mg/dL) and standard doses of statins, with a clinical follow-up of more than 12 months and stroke as clinical endpoint. TNT (n = 9,917) atorvastatin 80 mg vs. 10 mg; IDEAL (n = 8,888) atorvastatin 80 mg vs. simvastatin 20-40 mg; PROVE-IT (n = 4,162) atorvastatin 80 mg vs. pravastatin 40 mg; ALLIANCE (n = 2,442) atorvastatin 80 mg or target LDL < 70 mg/dL vs. standard treatment; and VBBS (n = 300) atorvastatin 80 mg vs. low dose lavastatin. The selected studies included secondary prevention patients (acute coronary syndrome, stable coronary disease and patients eligible for angioplasty). 25,709 patients were included (12,910 allocated to intensive atorvastatin treatment, and 12,799 to standard doses of statins). Stroke incidence, as reported from each trial, was compared between both treatments. RESULTS: Out of the 25,709 patients, 713 (2.77%) suffered a stroke during follow-up. The incidence of stroke was significantly reduced with intensive atorvastatin treatment in comparison with conventional doses of statins: 2.52% (n = 325) vs. 3.03% (n = 388); relative risk = 0.83; 95% confidence interval = 0.72-0.96; p = 0.0121. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive lipid lowering treatment with atorvastatin is associated with a 17% relative risk reduction of stroke in comparison with conventional doses of statins in secondary prevention population.

[Estimation of the prevalence, incidence, comorbidities and direct costs associated to stroke patients requiring care in an area of the Spanish population]. / Estimación de la prevalencia, incidencia, comorbilidades y costes directos asociados en pacientes que demandan atención por ictus en un ámbito poblacional español.

AIM: To determinate the prevalence, incidence, co-morbidities and therapeutic objectives and costs of stroke among Spanish population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed based on data from patients attended for stroke, aged > 30 years, from five Spanish primary care centres and two hospitals in 2006. Comparative group: patients without stroke. Main analysed variables were: age, sex, co-morbidity (cardiovascular/others), clinical parameters and direct costs (pharmacy, derivations, visits, emergencies, procurement, and hospitalisation). An ANCOVA analysis and logistic regression were used to fit the model. RESULTS: A 4.5% of 57.026 patients (n = 2.585; CI 95% = 4.3-4.7%) suffered stroke. The incidence of stroke was 220 new-cases/100.000 populations. Main differences between patients suffering stroke/control group were: age (72.5 vs. 53.5), men (58.2% vs. 44.6%), episodes/year (7,9 vs. 4,8), visits/year (15,8 vs. 8,1), p < 0,001. Stroke had an independent relation with age (OR = 1,4), male (OR = 2,3), diabetes (OR = 1,6), hypertension (OR = 1,5), smoking (OR = 1,5), alcohol (OR = 1,4), depression (OR = 1,4), dyslipidemia (OR = 1,3) and dementia (OR = 1,2). Some of the results were: systolic pressure (134.1 vs. 127.6 mmHg) and LDL-cholesterol (116.4 vs. 126.2 mg/dL), in presence/absence of stroke, p < 0,001. The average of annual costs of stroke was 2,590.36 vs. 985.26 euros, p < 0.001. After the correction of the logistic model results did not change: 1,774.33 (CI 95% = 1,720.10-1.828.55) vs. 1,021.98 euros (CI 95% = 1,010.92-1,033.03), p < 0,001. All components of costs were higher in the stroke group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients that demanded assistance for stroke had a higher number of co-morbidities and a higher total cost/patient/year. Therapeutic objectives could be improved, mainly in primary prevention of cardiovascular risk factors.