Unveiling the Binding between the Armadillo-Repeat Domain of Plakophilin 1 and the Intrinsically Disordered Transcriptional Repressor RYBP.

Plakophilin 1 (PKP1), a member of the p120ctn subfamily of the armadillo (ARM)-repeat-containing proteins, is an important structural component of cell-cell adhesion scaffolds although it can also be ubiquitously found in the cytoplasm and the nucleus. RYBP (RING 1A and YY1 binding protein) is a multifunctional intrinsically disordered protein (IDP) best described as a transcriptional regulator. Both proteins are involved in the development and metastasis of several types of tumors. We studied the binding of the armadillo domain of PKP1 (ARM-PKP1) with RYBP by using in cellulo methods, namely immunofluorescence (IF) and proximity ligation assay (PLA), and in vitro biophysical techniques, namely fluorescence, far-ultraviolet (far-UV) circular dichroism (CD), and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). We also characterized the binding of the two proteins by using in silico experiments. Our results showed that there was binding in tumor and non-tumoral cell lines. Binding in vitro between the two proteins was also monitored and found to occur with a dissociation constant in the low micromolar range (~10 µM). Finally, in silico experiments provided additional information on the possible structure of the binding complex, especially on the binding ARM-PKP1 hot-spot. Our findings suggest that RYBP might be a rescuer of the high expression of PKP1 in tumors, where it could decrease the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in some cancer cells.

Circular and L50-like leaderless enterocins share a common ABC-transporter immunity gene.

Microbes live within complex communities of interacting populations, either free-living in waters and soils or symbionts of animals and plants. Their interactions include the production of antimicrobial peptides (bacteriocins) to antagonize competitors, and these producers must carry their own immunity gene for self-protection. Whether other coexisting populations are sensitive or resistant to the bacteriocin producer will be key for the population dynamics within the microbial community. The immunity gene frequently consists of an ABC transporter to repel its own bacteriocin but rarely protects against a nonrelated bacteriocin. A case where this cross-resistance occurs mediated by a shared ABC transporter has been shown between enterocins MR10A/B and AS-48. The first is an L50-like leaderless enterocin, while AS-48 is a circular enterocin. In addition, L50-like enterocins such as MR10A/B have been found in E. faecalis and E. faecium, but AS-48 appears only in E. faecalis. Thus, using the ABC transporter of the enterocin MR10A/B gene cluster of Enterococcus faecalis MRR10-3 as a cross-resistance model, we aimed to unravel to what extent a particular ABC transporter can be shared across multiple bacteriocinogenic bacterial populations. To this end, we screened the MR10A/B-ABC transporters in available microbial genomes and analyzed their sequence homologies and distribution. Overall, our main findings are as follows: (i) the MR10A/B-ABC transporter is associated with multiple enterocin gene clusters; (ii) the different enterocins associated with this transporter have a saposin-like fold in common; (iii) the Mr10E component of the transporter is more conserved within its associated enterocin, while the Mr10FGH components are more conserved within the carrying species. This is the least known component of the transporter, but it has shown the greatest specificity to its corresponding enterocin. Bacteriocins are now being investigated as an alternative to antibiotics; hence, the wider or narrower distribution of the particular immunity gene should be taken into account for clinical applications to avoid the selection of resistant strains. Further research will be needed to investigate the mechanistic interactions between the Mr10E transporter component and the bacteriocin as well as the specific ecological and evolutionary mechanisms involved in the spread of the immunity transporter across multiple bacteriocins.

The armadillo-repeat domain of Plakophilin 1 binds to human enzyme PADI4.

Plakophilin 1 (PKP1), a member of the armadillo repeat family of proteins, is a key structural component of cell-cell adhesion scaffolds, although it can also be found in other cell locations, including the cytoplasm and the nucleus. PADI4 (peptidyl-arginine deiminase 4) is one of the human isoforms of a family of enzymes engaged in the conversion of arginine to citrulline, and is present in monocytes, macrophages, granulocytes, and in several types of cancer cells. It is the only family member observed both within the nucleus and the cytoplasm under ordinary conditions. We studied the binding of the armadillo domain of PKP1 (ARM-PKP1) with PADI4, by using several biophysical methods, namely fluorescence, far-ultraviolet (far-UV) circular dichroism (CD), isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), and molecular simulations; furthermore, binding was also tested by Western-blot (WB) analyses. Our results show that there was binding between the two proteins, with a dissociation constant in the low micromolar range (∼ 1 µM). Molecular modelling provided additional information on the possible structure of the binding complex, and especially on the binding hot-spot predicted for PADI4. This is the first time that the interaction between these two proteins has been described and studied. Our findings could be of importance to understand the development of tumors, where PKP1 and PADI4 are involved. Moreover, our findings pave the way to describe the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), whose construction is modulated by PADI4, and which mediate the proteolysis of cell-cell junctions where PKP1 intervenes.

PKP1 and MYC create a feedforward loop linking transcription and translation in squamous cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Plakophilin 1 (PKP1) is well-known as an important component of the desmosome, a cell structure specialized in spot-like cell-to-cell adhesion. Although desmosomes have generally been associated with tumor suppressor functions, we recently found that PKP1 is recurrently overexpressed in squamous cell lung cancer (SqCLC) to exert an oncogenic role by enhancing the translation of MYC (c-Myc), a major oncogene. In this study, we aim to further characterize the functional relationship between PKP1 and MYC. METHODS: To determine the functional relationship between PKP1 and MYC, we performed correlation analyses between PKP1 and MYC mRNA expression levels, gain/loss of function models, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and promoter mutagenesis followed by luciferase assays. RESULTS: We found a significant correlation between the mRNA levels of MYC and PKP1 in SqCLC primary tumor samples. In addition, we found that MYC is a direct transcription factor of PKP1 and binds to specific sequences within its promoter. In agreement with this, we found that MYC knockdown reduced PKP1 protein expression in different SqCLC models, which may explain the PKP1-MYC correlation that we found. Conversely, we found that PKP1 knockdown reduced MYC protein expression, while PKP1 overexpression enhanced MYC expression in these models. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, we propose a feedforward functional relationship in which PKP1 enhances MYC translation in conjunction with the translation initiation complex by binding to the 5'-UTR of MYC mRNA, whereas MYC promotes PKP1 transcription by binding to its promoter. These results suggest that PKP1 may serve as a therapeutic target for SqCLC.

The armadillo-repeat domain of plakophilin 1 binds the C-terminal sterile alpha motif (SAM) of p73.

BACKGROUND: Plakophilin 1 (PKP1) is a component of desmosomes, which are key structural components for cell-cell adhesion, and can also be found in other cell locations. The p53, p63 and p73 proteins belong to the p53 family of transcription factors, playing crucial roles in tumour suppression. The α-splice variant of p73 (p73α) has at its C terminus a sterile alpha motif (SAM); such domain, SAMp73, is involved in the interaction with other macromolecules. METHODS: We studied the binding of SAMp73 with the armadillo domain of PKP1 (ARM-PKP1) in the absence and the presence of 100 mM NaCl, by using several biophysical techniques, namely fluorescence, far-ultraviolet circular dichroism (CD), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), and molecular docking and simulations. RESULTS: Association was observed between the two proteins, with a dissociation constant of ~5 µM measured by ITC and fluorescence in the absence of NaCl. The binding region of SAMp73 involved residues of the so-called "middle-loop-end-helix" binding region (i.e., comprising the third helix, together with the C terminus of the second one, and the N-cap of the fourth), as shown by 15N, 1H- HSQC-NMR spectra. Molecular modelling provided additional information on the possible structure of the binding complex. CONCLUSIONS: This newly-observed interaction could have potential therapeutic relevance in the tumour pathways where PKP1 is involved, and under conditions when there is a possible inactivation of p53. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: The discovery of the binding between SAMp73 and ARM-PKP1 suggests a functional role for their interaction, including the possibility that SAMp73 could assist PKP1 in signalling pathways.

Intrinsically disordered protein NUPR1 binds to the armadillo-repeat domain of Plakophilin 1.

Plakophilin 1 (PKP1), a member of the armadillo repeat family of proteins, is a scaffold component of desmosomes, which are key structural components for cell-cell adhesion. However, PKP1 can be also found in the nucleus of several cells. NUPR1 is an intrinsically disordered protein (IDP) that localizes throughout the whole cell, and intervenes in the development and progression of several cancers. In this work, we studied the binding between PKP1 and NUPR1 by using several in vitro biophysical techniques and in cellulo approaches. The interaction occurred with an affinity in the low micromolar range (~10 µM), and involved the participation of at least one of the tryptophan residues of PKP1 (as shown by fluorescence and molecular docking). The binding region of NUPR1, mapped by NMR and molecular modelling, was a polypeptide patch at the 30s region of its sequence. The association between PKP1 and NUPR1 also occurred in cellulo and was localized in the nucleus, as tested by protein ligation assays (PLAs). We hypothesize that NUPR1 plays an active role in carcinogenesis modulating the function of PKP1.

Correction: Plakophilin 1 enhances MYC translation, promoting squamous cell lung cancer.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

The value of desmosomal plaque-related markers to distinguish squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Background: An antibody panel is needed to definitively differentiate between adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in order to meet more stringent requirements for the histologic classification of lung cancers. Staining of desmosomal plaque-related proteins may be useful in the diagnosis of lung SCC.Materials and methods: We compared the usefulness of six conventional (CK5/6, p40, p63, CK7, TTF1, and Napsin A) and three novel (PKP1, KRT15, and DSG3) markers to distinguish between lung SCC and AC in 85 small biopsy specimens (41 ACs and 44 SCCs). Correlations were examined between expression of the markers and patients' histologic and clinical data.Results: The specificity for SCC of membrane staining for PKP1, KRT15, and DSG3 was 97.4%, 94.6%, and 100%, respectively, and it was 100% when the markers were used together and in combination with the conventional markers (AUCs of 0.7619 for Panel 1 SCC, 0.7375 for Panel 2 SCC, 0.8552 for Panel 1 AC, and 0.8088 for Panel 2 AC). In a stepwise multivariate logistic regression model, the combination of CK5/6, p63, and PKP1 in membrane was the optimal panel to differentiate between SCC and AC, with a percentage correct classification of 96.2% overall (94.6% of ACs and 97.6% of SCCs). PKP1 and DSG3 are related to the prognosis.Conclusions: PKP1, KRT15, and DSG3 are highly specific for SCC, but they were more useful to differentiate between SCC and AC when used together and in combination with conventional markers. PKP1 and DSG3 expressions may have prognostic value.

Plakophilin 1 enhances MYC translation, promoting squamous cell lung cancer.

Plakophilin 1 (PKP1) is a member of the arm-repeat (armadillo) and plakophilin gene families and it is an essential component of the desmosomes. Although desmosomes have generally been associated with tumor suppressor functions, we have consistently observed that PKP1 is among the top overexpressed proteins in squamous cell lung cancer. To explore this paradox, we developed in vivo and in vitro functional models of PKP1 gain/loss in squamous cell lung cancer. CRISPR-Cas9 PKP1 knockout severely impaired cell proliferation, but it increased cell dissemination. In addition, PKP1 overexpression increased cell proliferation, cell survival, and in vivo xenograft engraftment. We further investigated the molecular mechanism of the mainly oncogenic function of PKP1 by combining transcriptomics, proteomics, and protein-nucleic acid interaction assays. Interestingly, we found that PKP1 enhances MYC translation in collaboration with the translation initiation complex by binding to the 5'-UTR of MYC mRNA. We propose PKP1 as an oncogene in SqCLC and a novel posttranscriptional regulator of MYC. PKP1 may be a valuable diagnostic biomarker and potential therapeutic target for SqCLC. Importantly, PKP1 inhibition may indirectly target MYC, a primary anticancer target.

Progressive changes in composition of lymphocytes in lung tissues from patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Immune cell infiltration is a common feature of many human solid tumors. Innate and adaptative immune systems contribute to tumor immunosurveillance. We investigated whether tumors evade immune surveillance by inducing states of tolerance and/or through the inability of some immune subpopulations to effectively penetrate tumor nests. Immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry analysis were used to study the composition and distribution of immune subpopulations in samples of peripheral blood, tumor tissue (TT), adjacent tumor tissue (ATT), distant non-tumor tissue (DNTT), cancer nests, cancer stroma, and invasive margin in 61 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. A significantly higher percentage of T and B cells and significantly lower percentage of NK cells were detected in TT than in DNTT. Memory T cells (CD4+CD45RO+, CD8+CD45RO+) and activated T cells (CD8+DR+) were more prevalent in TT. Alongside this immune activation, the percentage of T cells with immunosuppressive activity was higher in TT than in DNTT. B- cells were practically non-existent in tumor nests and were preferentially located in the invasive margin. The dominant NK cell phenotype in peripheral blood and DNTT was the cytotoxic phenotype (CD56+ CD16+), while the presence of these cells was significantly decreased in ATT and further decreased in TT. Finally, the immunologic response differed between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma and according to the tumor differentiation grade. These findings on the infiltration of innate and adaptative immune cells into tumors contribute to a more complete picture of the immune reaction in NSCLC.

Differential immunohistochemical localization of desmosomal plaque-related proteins in non-small-cell lung cancer.

AIMS: Immunohistochemistry is a highly valuable and widely used tool in the subtyping of lung carcinomas. The aim of this study was to identify markers for the differential diagnosis of non-small-cell carcinomas. METHODS AND RESULTS: We report on the immunohistochemical localization of plakophilin-1 (PKP1), keratin-15 (KRT15) and desmoglein-3 (DSG3) intercellular adhesion proteins in samples from 75 primary non-small-cell lung cancers in non-treated patients. The staining pattern of these proteins differed between squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas, with no membrane staining in the latter. Membrane staining for all three proteins was characteristic of squamous cell carcinomas. We observed a relationship between the presence/absence of these proteins in the membranes of squamous cell carcinomas and the differentiation grade, with more intense staining in better differentiated areas. CONCLUSIONS: Staining for these proteins marked intercellular junctions that are characteristic of stratified squamous epithelium and of neoplasias with this type of differentiation, and can be useful in the diagnosis of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. The high specificity of membrane staining for PKP1 and DSG3 and high sensitivity of cytoplasmic and membrane staining for KRT15 for the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma may be useful for the differential diagnosis of non-small-cell carcinomas.