Pain prevalence and pain relief in end-of-life care - a national registry study.

BACKGROUND: Despite pain control being a top priority in end-of-life care, pain continues to be a troublesome symptom and comprehensive data on pain prevalence and pain relief in patients with different diagnoses are scarce. METHODS: The Swedish Register of Palliative Care (SRPC) was used to retrieve data from 2011 to 2022 about pain during the last week of life. Data were collected regarding occurrence of pain, whether pain was relieved and occurrence of severe pain, to examine if pain differed between patients with cancer, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and dementia. Binary logistic regression models adjusted for sex and age were used. RESULTS: A total of 315 000 patients were included in the study. Pain during the last week of life was more commonly seen in cancer (81%) than in dementia (69%), heart failure (68%) or COPD (57%), also when controlled for age and sex, p < 0.001. Severe forms of pain were registered in 35% in patients with cancer, and in 17-21% in non-cancer patients. Complete pain relief (regardless of pain intensity) was achieved in 73-87% of those who experienced pain, depending on diagnosis. The proportion of patients with complete or partial pain relief was 99.8% for the whole group. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of pain, including severe pain, was less common in patients with heart failure, COPD or dementia, compared to patients with cancer. Compared with cancer, pain was more often fully relieved for patients with dementia, but less often in heart failure and COPD. As severe pain was seen in about a third of the cancer patients, the study still underlines the need for better pain management in the imminently dying. TRIAL REGISTRATION: No trial registration was made as all patients were deceased and all data were retrieved from The Swedish Register of Palliative Care database.

Specialized Palliative Care for Patients with Chronic Heart Failure at End of Life: Transfers, Emergency Department Visits, and Hospital Deaths.

Objective: Specialized palliative care (SPC) may contribute to improved quality of life in patients with life-limiting chronic heart failure (CHF). This study examined SPC and possible differences in the care process regarding emergency department (ED) visits, transfers, and place of death for severely ill patients with CHF. Materials and Methods: This retrospective observational registry study used the health care consumption data from the Stockholm Regional Council. Logistic regression analyses of age, sex, palliative care, comorbidities, and socioeconomic status were performed. Results: Of the 4322 individuals who died of heart failure between 2015 and 2019 and did not reside in a nursing home, 24% received SPC. Receiving SPC was associated with a lower odds ratio (OR) of ED visits (OR 0.24, p < 0.0001), unplanned transfers (OR 0.39, p < 0.0001), and emergency hospital as a place of death (OR 0.10, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, a better socioeconomic situation, younger age, and fewer comorbidities were associated with a lower OR of ED visits and transfers (p < 0.0001 to p = 0.013 in different comparisons). Multiple comorbidities (p < 0.0002) and younger age (p < 0.0001) were associated with a higher OR of emergency hospitals as a place of death. Conclusion: Approximately one-quarter of patients who died of heart failure received SPC. Receipt of SPC was associated with a significantly reduced number of ED visits, transfers between health care services, and risk of dying in emergency hospitals.

The Use of Low-Dose Methadone as Add-On to Ongoing Opioid Treatment in Palliative Cancer Care-An Underrated Treatment?

The aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge of low-dose methadone treatment in palliative cancer care. In Sweden, methadone is quite common in specialized palliative care, where almost a tenth of patients are prescribed this drug. Negative attitudes towards methadone do not seem to prevent it from being used for pain management, and by starting with low doses and then increasing slowly and gradually, methadone can apparently be introduced safely. It is still uncertain whether methadone has a better analgesic effect than other opioids. However, for pain relief in cancer patients with severe and complex cancer-related pain, NMDA receptor inhibition with methadone may, in selected cases, be an attractive alternative, especially in the form of low-dose supplements to other ongoing opioids. Due to long half-life and complex metabolism, the use of methadone requires an experienced physician and solid follow-up. Continuous administration of opioids, including low-dose methadone, has been proven effective and safe in reducing pain in dying patients without increasing the risk of confusion, regardless of age.

Advanced cancer and concomitant dementia: access to specialized palliative care, emergency room, hospital care, and place of death.

BACKGROUND: Dementia and advanced cancer are complex, life-limiting conditions that benefit from specialized palliative care (SPC) interventions at the end of life. The objective was to study possible differences in care for patients with concomitant advanced cancer and dementia (CA-DEM) or cancer only (CA) regarding access to SPC, acute hospital care, and place of death. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational registry study on health care consumption data from the Stockholm Regional Council involving logistic regression analyses of age, sex, living arrangements, comorbidities, dementia diagnosis, and socio-economic status. RESULTS: Of the 12,667 persons aged ≥65 years who died from advanced cancer between 2015 and 2019, 605 had concomitant dementia. Of these, 76% of patients with CA and 42% of patients with CA-DEM had access to SPC (p<.0001). There were more admissions to palliative care for persons not living in nursing homes (p<.0001), women (p<.0001), socioeconomically privileged patients (p<.05), those with fewer comorbidities (p<.0001), and younger patients (<85 years) (p<.0001). Access to SPC reduced ER visits, hospitalizations, and acute hospital deaths for CA, whereas access to SPC only reduced hospital deaths in the CA-DEM group. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of being admitted to SPC was lower in cancer patients with known dementia. Access to SPC reduced emergency room visits and acute admissions to hospitals for the whole group, and hospital deaths both for CA and CA-DEM.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer: access to palliative care, emergency room visits and hospital deaths.

BACKGROUND: Despite the severe symptoms experienced by dying COPD patients, specialized palliative care (SPC) services focus mainly on cancer patients. We aimed to study the access to SPC that COPD and lung cancer (LC) patients receive and how that access affects the need for acute hospital care. METHODS: A descriptive regional registry study using data acquired through VAL, the Stockholm Regional Council's central data warehouse, which covers nearly all healthcare use in the county of Stockholm. All the patients who died of COPD or LC from 2015 to 2019 were included. T-tests, chi-2 tests, and univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed on the accumulated data. RESULTS: In total, 6479 patients, (2917 with COPD and 3562 with LC) were studied. The patients with LC had more access to SPC during the last three months of life than did those with COPD (77% vs. 18%, respectively; p < .0001), whereas patients with COPD were more likely to be residents of nursing homes than those with LC (32% vs. 9%, respectively; p < .0001). Higher socioeconomic status (SES) (p < .01) and patient age < 80 years (p < .001) were associated with increased access to SPC for LC patients. Access to SPC correlated with fewer emergency room visits (p < .0001 for both COPD and LC patients) and fewer admissions to acute hospitals during the last month of life (p < .0001 for both groups). More COPD patients died in acute hospitals than lung cancer patients, (39% vs. 20%; χ2 = 287, p < .0001), with significantly lower figures for those who had access to SPC (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to dying COPD patients, LC patients have more access to SPC. Access to SPC reduces the need for emergency room visits and admissions to acute hospitals.

Continuous subcutaneous infusion for pain control in dying patients: experiences from a tertiary palliative care center.

BACKGROUND: Continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI) via ambulatory infusion pump (AIP) is a valuable method of pain control in palliative care. When using CSCI, low-dose methadone as add-on to other opioids might be an option in complex pain situations. This study aimed to investigate the effects, and adverse effects, of CSCI for pain control in dying patients, with particular interest in methadone use. METHODS: This was an observational cohort study. Imminently dying patients with pain, admitted to specialized palliative inpatient wards and introduced on CSCI, were monitored daily by staff for symptoms (Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale - IPOS), sedation (Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale - RASS), performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group - ECOG) and delirium (Confusion Assessment Method - CAM). RESULTS: Ninety-three patients with a median survival of 4 days were included. Of the 47 patients who survived ≥3 days, the proportion of patients with severe/overwhelming pain decreased from 45 to 19% (p < 0.001) after starting CSCI, with only a moderate increase in morphine equivalent daily dose of opioids (MEDD). Alertness was marginally decreased (1 point on the 10-point RASS scale, p = 0.001), whereas performance status and prevalence of delirium, regardless of age, remained unchanged. Both patients with methadone as add-on (MET, n = 13) and patients with only other opioids (NMET, n = 34), improved in pain control (p < 0.05 and 0.001, respectively), despite that MET patients had higher pain scores at baseline (p < 0.05) and were on a higher MEDD (240 mg vs.133 mg). No serious adverse effects demanding treatment stop were reported. CONCLUSIONS: CSCI via AIP is an effective way to reduce pain in dying patients without increased adverse effects. Add-on methadone may be beneficial in patients with severe complex pain.

Excess deaths from COVID-19 correlate with age and socio-economic status. A database study in the Stockholm region.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the entire health care system, internationally as well as in Sweden. We aimed to study excess deaths (all death causes, but also COVID-19-related deaths) during the COVID-19 pandemic regarding age, socio-economic status, the situation in nursing homes, and place of death for nursing home residents. DESIGN: We performed a descriptive regional registry data study using VAL, the Stockholm Regional Council's central data warehouse, which covers almost all health care use in the county of Stockholm. T tests and chi-square tests were used for comparisons. RESULTS: Compared with 2016-2019, there were excess deaths in March-May 2020 (p < 0.0001), mainly explained by COVID-19, but in April there were also unexplained excess deaths. Individuals dying from COVID-19 were older than patients dying from other causes (p < 0.0001). There were more patient deaths among people residing in less advantaged socio-economic areas (p < 0.0001). Nursing home residents dying from COVID-19 were more often admitted to acute hospitals than residents dying from other causes (p < 0.0001). Also, the proportion of admissions of nursing home residents dying from other causes increased from April to May 2020 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Dying from COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, nursing home residents, and persons from less advantaged socio-economic groups. The pandemic has resulted in an increase in acute admissions of dying nursing home residents to acute hospitals.

Methadone in Swedish specialized palliative care-Is it the magic bullet in complex cancer-related pain?

CONTEXT: Despite being associated with dependence and social stigma, methadone is a potential end-of-life option in complex cancer pain. OBJECTIVES: To explore attitudes and opinions about methadone and its potential role and current use in complex end-of-life pain. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews (n = 30) with physicians in specialized palliative care, transcribed and analyzed with conventional qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: According to the physicians, patients and relatives expressed unexpectedly few negative attitudes, not affecting methadone's use as an analgesic. Complex pain in bone-metastatic cancer of the prostate, breast and kidney, as well as pancreatic cancer and sarcomas were recurrent suggestions of appropriate indications. Most of the informants stated that they applied a mechanism-based treatment and mainly prescribed low-dose methadone as an add-on to an existing opioid therapy to benefit from methadone´s proposed NMDA-receptor inhibiting properties, e.g. in cases with reduced opioid sensitivity. Despite its complex pharmacokinetics with a long half-life, most informants expressed defined strategies to avoid side-effects such as respiratory depression, especially when initiating treatment in the home-care setting. While many palliative care physicians expressed an overly enthusiastic attitude, others stressed the risks of overconfidence, low precision in use, and overlooked treatment options. Besides the obvious physical pain-relieving effects, they stated that effective pain relief could result in a reduced workload and emotional empowerment, both for physicians and staff. CONCLUSION: Methadone, especially in the form of low-dose add-on to other opioids is widely advocated in Swedish specialized palliative care as a practical and safe method with rapid onset in complex pain situations at the end of life.

The Use of Low-Dose Methadone as Add-On to Regular Opioid Therapy in Cancer-Related Pain at End of Life: A National Swedish Survey in Specialized Palliative Care.

Background: Low-dose methadone in addition to another ongoing opioid therapy is a promising approach for managing complex cancer-related pain and is, despite limited evidence, used in clinical practice. Objective: To investigate the use of low-dose methadone in specialized palliative care in Sweden. Design: Specialized palliative care services in Sweden answered a survey regarding methadone use in individual patients over 12 months. Setting/Subjects: The survey was an add-on to the Swedish Register of Palliative Care's (SRPC) mandatory end-of-life questionnaire (ELQ). Results: Sixty of 133 invited units (45%) participated in the study. A total of 4780 ELQs were registered. Four hundred ten of these patients received methadone (9%). In 96% of these patients, methadone was prescribed as an add-on to ongoing opioid therapy, mostly because of poor pain control due to mixed nociceptive and neuropathic pain (70%). Methadone was used for a median of 21 days, in 86% of cases until death. Mean daily methadone doses increased from 7 mg at start to 21 mg (p < 0.005) during the last 24 hours. Corresponding morphine equivalent daily doses of other opioids were 184 and 199 mg (p < 0.05), respectively. A pain-relieving effect was reported in 94% of the patients. Adverse effects were seen in 20% of the patients; none of these was severe. Conclusion: The addition of low-dose methadone to an ongoing opioid therapy in patients with complex cancer-related pain is well established in Swedish specialized palliative care. It appears to have good pain-relieving effects and to be safe.

Improved Pain Control in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients by Introducing Low-Dose Oral Methadone in Addition to Ongoing Opioid Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Cancer pain is often not well controlled and there is a need for improved treatment strategies. Methadone exhibits unique properties among opioids and recent reports show promising results from adding a low dose of methadone to regular opioid therapy. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of oral low-dose methadone added to regular scheduled opioids in terminally ill patients with complex cancer-related pain. DESIGN: This was a retrospective chart review. SETTING/SUBJECTS: All patients with advanced cancer treated in a specialized palliative care unit who had received oral methadone in addition to another regular opioid were identified. MEASUREMENTS: Intensity of pain, opioid doses, and occurrence of sedation, delirium, and respiratory depression were obtained from the patients' medical records for a period of one week after initiation of methadone. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included. The median daily methadone dose was 10 mg during the treatment period. Eighty percent of the patients had improved pain control (p < 0.001). There was an increased risk for sedation and delirium, most pronounced in patients living 14 days or less after the start of methadone. No patient experienced respiratory depression. CONCLUSION: Addition of low-dose oral methadone to regular high-dose opioid treatment in cancer patients with complex pain close to death improves pain control, but also increases the risk for sedation and delirium.