Left Ventricular Unloading Using Intra-Aortic Entrainment Pumping Before Reperfusion Reduces Post-AMI Infarct Size.

BACKGROUND: Anterior myocardial infarction standard of care prioritizes swift coronary reperfusion. Recent studies show left ventricular (LV) unloading with transvalvular axial-flow pumps for 30 minutes before reperfusion (versus immediate reperfusion) reduces 28-day infarct size. Intra-aortic entrainment pumping, using hardware located away from the heart to provide support throughout the cardiac cycle, reduce effective systemic vascular resistance, and augment visceral blood flow and pressure, may reproduce this benefit with reduced risk. This study characterized hemodynamic effects of unloading before and during reperfusion using intra-aortic entrainment pumping and investigated whether unloading reduced anterior myocardial infarction (AMI) scar size. METHODS AND RESULTS: Yorkshire swine were subjected to 90 minutes of left anterior descending artery balloon occlusion and randomly assigned to immediate reperfusion (n=6) versus 30 minutes unloading before reperfusion followed by 120 minutes further unloading (n=7). Unloading was achieved using percutaneous entrainment pumping in the descending aorta. The AMI model matches that used in recent transvalvular pumping studies. Mortality before randomization was 22%. After randomization, mortality was 36% for immediate reperfusion and 0% for unloading. Unloading showed immediate hemodynamic benefit that increased through reperfusion and continued support, leading to distinct differences in cardiac function between groups after 30 minutes of reperfusion. Unloading increased stroke volume and cardiac efficiency at this timepoint relative to pre-occlusion baseline and reduced 28-day LV scar size by 37-45%. CONCLUSIONS: We present the first preclinical data showing extra-cardiac LV unloading before coronary reperfusion using intra-aortic entrainment pumping decreases 28-day infarct size. Extra-cardiac unloading to reduce LV scar size may provide an alternative to transvalvular pumping with potential advantages including reduced risk.

Estimation of the optimal VV delay by an IEGM-based method in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Determination of the optimal interventricular (VV) delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy currently relies on costly, time-consuming echocardiographic (ECHO) methods. This study evaluated the performance of a new intracardiac electrogram (IEGM)-based VV method compared to the aortic velocity time integral (AVTI) method of VV delay optimization. The study included two patient groups. Eleven patients enrolled by a single center in the Rhythm II ICD trial underwent prospective comparisons of the AVTI at the VV interval determined by the IEGM VV method versus the maximum AVTI at the echocardiographically determined optimal VV delay. In 61 patients enrolled in the RHYTHM VV trial, the same testing methods were compared retrospectively. In the prospective study, the maximum AVTI by the ECHO-based method (24.3 +/- 7.9 cm), was closely correlated with maximum AVTI by the IEGM-based method (23.9 +/- 7.9 cm; concordance correlation coefficient = 0.99; 95% confidence, lower limit of 98%. Likewise, in the retrospective analysis, the ECHO-determined maximum AVTI (22.1 +/- 8.2 cm) was similar to that determined by the IEGM-based method (20.9 +/- 8.3 cm; concordance correlation coefficient = 0.98; 95% confidence, lower limit of 97%).

Comparison of beta-blockers, amiodarone plus beta-blockers, or sotalol for prevention of shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the OPTIC Study: a randomized trial.

CONTEXT: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy is effective but is associated with high-voltage shocks that are painful. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether amiodarone plus beta-blocker or sotalol are better than beta-blocker alone for prevention of ICD shocks. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A randomized controlled trial with blinded adjudication of events of 412 patients from 39 outpatient ICD clinical centers located in Canada, Germany, United States, England, Sweden, and Austria, conducted from January 13, 2001, to September 28, 2004. Patients were eligible if they had received an ICD within 21 days for inducible or spontaneously occurring ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to treatment for 1 year with amiodarone plus beta-blocker, sotalol alone, or beta-blocker alone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Primary outcome was ICD shock for any reason. RESULTS: Shocks occurred in 41 patients (38.5%) assigned to beta-blocker alone, 26 (24.3%) assigned to sotalol, and 12 (10.3%) assigned to amiodarone plus beta-blocker. A reduction in the risk of shock was observed with use of either amiodarone plus beta-blocker or sotalol vs beta-blocker alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.68; P<.001). Amiodarone plus beta-blocker significantly reduced the risk of shock compared with beta-blocker alone (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14-0.52; P<.001) and sotalol (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22-0.85; P = .02). There was a trend for sotalol to reduce shocks compared with beta-blocker alone (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.37-1.01; P = .055). The rates of study drug discontinuation at 1 year were 18.2% for amiodarone, 23.5% for sotalol, and 5.3% for beta-blocker alone. Adverse pulmonary and thyroid events and symptomatic bradycardia were more common among patients randomized to amiodarone. CONCLUSIONS: Despite use of advanced ICD technology and treatment with a beta-blocker, shocks occur commonly in the first year after ICD implant. Amiodarone plus beta-blocker is effective for preventing these shocks and is more effective than sotalol but has an increased risk of drug-related adverse effects.Clinical Trials Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00257959.