Long term outcome of multidisciplinary management of urethro-rectal fistula after urologic surgery.

Urethro-rectal fistula (URF) is a rare but serious condition whose treatment is poorly codified. This study aims to evaluate the short and long-term results of multidisciplinary management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected the records of patients with URF operated on at the University Hospital of Tours between January 1, 2000 and January 1, 2020. Short-term and long-term results according to management are reported. RESULTS: The study included 20 patients. As an initial gesture, 11 patients underwent bladder catheterization and colostomy, seven underwent bladder catheterization alone, one underwent graciloplasty, and one, a York Mason procedure. The success rate of initial conservative management was only 5% (1/20). As a secondary or tertiary intervention, ten patients underwent a York Mason procedure and nine underwent graciloplasty. At the end of the study period, with a median follow-up of 50 months, 19 had been effectively treated for URF, 16 were able to have colostomy closure with restoration of digestive continuity while four had a permanent stoma. One patient had anal incontinence, 14% had major stress urinary incontinence. CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary care remains a cornerstone of the treatment of URF because iterative surgeries may be required, with an overall success rate of up to 95% at the end of follow-up.

[Acute renal failure of the donor in encephalic death: A real contraindication to kidney transplantation?] / L'insuffisance rénale aiguë du donneur en mort encéphalique : une réelle contre-indication à la transplantation rénale ?

INTRODUCTION: The shortage of kidney transplants encourages the expansion of the limits of eligibility criteria for donation. Many donors who are brain dead display acute renal failure at the time of death; is this a real contraindication to harvesting? The aim of this study was to assess kidney graft survival from donors after brain death with confirmed acute renal failure, with or without anuria previous donation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All of the transplants performed in two university hospitals between 2010 and 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients who underwent single kidney transplant from a brain-dead donor with acute renal failure (ARF) were included in this study. ARI was defined here by a decrease over 50 % of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) to a threshold below 45mL/min/1.73 m2 at the time of kidney procurement. Kidney graft survival, incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) and the GFR at 12 months were analyzed. Analysis of kidney transplant survival based on pre-implantation biopsies was additionally done. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty four patients were transplanted with a kidney from donor with ARF during the selected period. At the admission in ICU the average GFR was 67,7±19mL/min/1,73m2. At the time of donation, the average age of donors was 56.4±17.7 years, the GFR was 33.7±8.0mL/min/1.73 m2 16 % of donors were anuric. Cold ischemia time (CIT) was 16.8±5.0hours. The average age of recipients was 55.6±14.1 years. 81 % of the cases were primary transplants. Graft function took place within 7.8±9.4 days after transplantation. There were two non-primary functions (PNF). One hundred and fifty two patients (93 %) had a functional graft at 12 months. The mean GFR at 12 months was 46.8±20.1mL/min/1.73 m2 and 122 patients (73 %) had a GFR greater than 30mL/min/1.73 m2. Seventy-one percent of preimplantation biopsies revealed acute tubular necrosis (ATU); no cortical necrosis was observed. Survival of theses grafts was 85 %, comparable to the total population of study (P=0,21) CONCLUSION: The acute renal failure of the brain-dead donor should not alone be systematically a contraindication to harvesting and kidney transplantation.

Robot-assisted renal transplantation using the retroperitoneal approach (RART) with more than one year follow up: Description of the technique and results.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the technique and report our first experience of robotic-assisted renal transplantation (RART) with more than one year follow up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In our center the first case of RART was realized in October 2013 with a cadaveric graft. We used the combined extra- and intraperitoneal robot assisted laparoscopic route with extraperitoneal positioning of the graft and intraperitoneal transplantation. The patient was placed in the supine position with arms along the body; the robot came from the right inferior part of the patient. Access to the retroperitoneal space was obtained using an Alexis trocar that permitted the insertion of the kidney with ice without losing the pneumoperitoneum. Ports included a 12-mm camera port (placed under the ombilicus), two 8-mm robotic ports (placed 6cms laterally from the previous port) and a 12-mm assistant port (placed between the upper port and the ombilic). All the pre-, per- and postoperative data were prospectively included in a database. We report the results of the initial experience of RART, performed with more than one year follow-up. RESULTS: This technique is the first described using the retroperitoneal approach that is the routine approach for conventional open renal transplantation. This approach permitted to perform excellent arterial, veinous and ureteral anastomosis. Eight cases of RART were conducted between October 2013 and November 2015 (five men and three women). The average age was 58 years (range 39-75years). The average body mass index was 28 (range 22-38). Five patients had history of abdominal surgery and were dialyzed for 30 months on average (range 3-63months). Three left and five right cadavers kidneys were transplanted in the right iliac fossa. The mean graft size was 109mm (range 90-130). The mean length of the incision for insertion of the graft was 60 mms (40-100mms). Mean warm ischemia time was 63minutes (range 46-84). The total operative time was 200minutes (149-245). No patient was transfused during surgery and two were transfused postoperatively. Median length of hospital stay was 14 days (range 10-30 days). Only one patient needed postoperative morphine, the pain visual analogic scale 12hours postoperatively was 2 (0-5). Mean serum creatinine at seven days, at three months and at one year was 400 (98-639micromol/L), 151 (80-235micromol/L) and 129 (86-194micromol/L) respectively. At one year follow-up, no patient had a wound infection or incisional hernia. One patient was re-operated for ureteral anastomosis stricture. CONCLUSION: The retroperitoneal approach for RART permits the kidney to be cooled and a direct access to the iliac vessels and bladder. This initial series with more than a year of post-monitoring RART shows promising results despite some initial technical difficulties. The procedure can still be improved and hoped to see an improvement in the results. A comparison to the results of the conventional route is necessary before diffusing the robot-assisted technique. LEVEL OF PROOF: 3.

[Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of indeterminate renal cysts on CT]. / Évaluation de l'apport de l'échographie de contraste dans l'analyse des kystes rénaux de nature indéterminée au scanner.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the management of Bosniak type 2F and 3 renal cysts on CT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 14 patients with 15 Bosniak type 2F and 3 renal cysts on contrast enhanced CT. All patients underwent CEUS of the kidneys after injection of SonoVue(®). Using predetermined criteria, the lesions were classified as benign, malignant or indeterminate. Patients either underwent surgery or follow-up CT at one to three years. RESULTS: From the 15 indeterminate cysts on CT, 12 were either benign (n=8) or malignant (n=4) on CEUS. From the eight cysts considered benign on CEUS, seven remained stable on follow-up CT after a minimum of one year interval and one was surgically resected and confirmed to be benign. All four cysts considered malignant on CEUS were surgically resected and three were confirmed to be malignant and one was confirmed to be benign. Three cysts were indeterminate: two lesions were surgically resected and one was benign while the other was malignant and one lesion was stable at one year follow-up CT. CONCLUSION: CEUS was able to characterize indeterminate lesions as benign or malignant in 80% of cases with 92% reliability. Twenty percent of cysts remained indeterminate on CEUS. CEUS is reliable as a complement to CT in the evaluation of Bosniak type 2F and 3 renal cysts.

[T1 bladder carcinoma: prognostic value of the muscularis mucosae invasion (T1a/T1b). A multicenter study by the French Urological Association (CCAFU)]. / Tumeur urothéliale de vessie T1 : valeur pronostique du franchissement de la muscularis mucosae (T1a/T1b). Etude multicentrique du Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie (CCAFU).

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this multicenter study was to determine the prognostic value of the depth of invasion of lamina propria and more specifically the influence of the invasion of the muscularis mucosae on survival parameters in T1 bladder carcinoma. PATIENTS: Six urological centers included patients between 1994 and 2004 who had an initial T1 bladder tumor. All T1 tumors were substaged according to the muscularis mucosae (MM) invasion into T1a (no invasion beyond the MM) and T1b (invasion beyond MM but preserving the muscle). Among the 387 patients included, 269 (69.5%) were found T1a and 118 (30.5%) T1b. Mean follow-up was 45.4 months. T1a and T1b groups were comparable except for tumor grade that was higher in T1b (p<0.001). RESULTS: Survival without recurrence was not significantly different between T1a and T1b groups (p<0.3) but T1a stage was found as an independent factor for survival without progression (RR=0.49; IC 95%=[0.71-0.90]), specific survival (RR=0.33; IC 95%=[0.16-0.67]) and global survival (RR=0.52; IC 95%=[0.32-0.85]). CONCLUSION: This study, the largest on the subject to our knowledge, have shown that muscularis mucosae invasion was a prognostic factor for survival without progression, specific survival, and global survival. We support that routine pathological assessment of the level of MM invasion in patients with stage T1 bladder cancer should be included in the histopathological report.

[Results of an investigation by questionnaire into interest in neuro-urology of urology residents]. / Résultat d'une enquête par questionnaire sur l'intérêt porté à la neuro-urologie par les urologues en formation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the interest borne towards neuro-urology within the community of the urology residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January and May 2009, all urology residents received an anonymous questionnaire by e-mail estimating their interest for neuro-urology. The analyzed data were: epidemiologic data; participation in theoretical learning and training courses practices; interest and investment in the speciality; opinion on the current formation. The qualitative variables were compared by the chi-2 test. P values <0,05 were considered significant. RESULTS: The rate of answer was 45,3 %. The middle age was 28,7+/-2,3 years. Ninety-two (70,7 %) of the 130 urologist residents questioned wished to exert full-time or divided in a hospital structure. They were 40 % to have a multidisciplinary neuro-urology staff, and 80 % were in a service which dealt with suffering patients of neurological bladder. The percentage of urologist residents interested by neuro-urology was 69,2 %, and 61,5 % of them wished to practice this activity in their future exercise. This wish was significantly higher for those resulting from the ENC (p<0,05), for those wishing to exert at the hospital (p<0,01) and for those who practice urology at a level of expertise in neuro-urology (p<0,01). The theoretical and practical teaching of neuro-urology were considered as being insufficient for respectively 73,9 % and 64,2 % of the urologist residents. In contrast, the average note allotted to the neuro-urology module of the ECU was of 7,47 out of 10. CONCLUSION: Neuro-urology seems to be particularly attractive for the urologist residents, and many wished to integrate it in their future exercise. The motivation was more important for those who wished to carry out a career in hospital. Even if the quality of the teaching was very noted, their modalities were considered to be insufficient by most of them.