Comprehensive analysis of intramolecular G-quadruplex structures: furthering the understanding of their formalism.

G-quadruplexes (G4) are helical structures found in guanine-rich DNA or RNA sequences. Generally, their formalism is based on a few dozen structures, which can produce some inconsistencies or incompleteness. Using the website ASC-G4, we analyzed the structures of 333 intramolecular G4s, of all types, which allowed us to clarify some key concepts and present new information. To each of the eight distinguishable topologies corresponds a groove-width signature and a predominant glycosidic configuration (gc) pattern governed by the directions of the strands. The relative orientations of the stacking guanines within the strands, which we quantified and related to their vertical gc successions, determine the twist and tilt of the helices. The latter impact the minimum groove widths, which represent the space available for lateral ligand binding. The G4 four helices have similar twists, even when these twists are irregular, meaning that they have various angles along the strands. Despite its importance, the vertical gc succession has no strict one-to-one relationship with the topology, which explains the discrepancy between some topologies and their corresponding circular dichroism spectra. This study allowed us to introduce the new concept of platypus G4s, which are structures with properties corresponding to several topologies.

Computational Tool to Design Small Synthetic Inhibitors Selective for XIAP-BIR3 Domain.

X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) exercises its biological function by locking up and inhibiting essential caspase-3, -7 and -9 toward apoptosis execution. It is overexpressed in multiple human cancers, and it plays an important role in cancer cells' death skipping. Inhibition of XIAP-BIR3 domain and caspase-9 interaction was raised as a promising strategy to restore apoptosis in malignancy treatment. However, XIAP-BIR3 antagonists also inhibit cIAP1-2 BIR3 domains, leading to serious side effects. In this study, we worked on a theoretical model that allowed us to design and optimize selective synthetic XIAP-BIR3 antagonists. Firstly, we assessed various MM-PBSA strategies to predict the XIAP-BIR3 binding affinities of synthetic ligands. Molecular dynamics simulations using hydrogen mass repartition as an additional parametrization with and without entropic term computed by the interaction entropy approach produced the best correlations. These simulations were then exploited to generate 3D pharmacophores. Following an optimization with a training dataset, five features were enough to model XIAP-BIR3 synthetic ligands binding to two hydrogen bond donors, one hydrogen bond acceptor and two hydrophobic groups. The correlation between pharmacophoric features and computed MM-PBSA free energy revealed nine residues as crucial for synthetic ligand binding: Thr308, Glu314, Trp323, Leu307, Asp309, Trp310, Gly306, Gln319 and Lys297. Ultimately, and three of them seemed interesting to use to improve XIAP-BR3 versus cIAP-BIR3 selectivity: Lys297, Thr308 and Asp309.

ASC-G4, an algorithm to calculate advanced structural characteristics of G-quadruplexes.

ASC-G4 is an algorithm for the calculation of the advanced structural characteristics of G-quadruplexes (G4). It allows the unambiguous determination of the intramolecular G4 topology, based on the oriented strand numbering. It also resolves the ambiguity in the determination of the guanine glycosidic configuration. With this algorithm, we showed that the use of the C3' or C5' atoms to calculate the groove width in G4 is more appropriate than the P atoms and that the groove width does not always reflect the space available within the groove. For the latter, the minimum groove width is more appropriate. The application of ASC-G4 to 207 G4 structures guided the choices made for the calculations. A website based on ASC-G4 (http://tiny.cc/ASC-G4) was created, where the user uploads his G4 structure and gets its topology, the types of its loops and their lengths, the presence of snapbacks and bulges, the distribution of guanines in the tetrads and strands, the glycosidic configuration of these guanines, their rise, the groove widths, the minimum groove widths, the tilt and twist angles, the backbone dihedral angles, etc. It also provides a large number of atom-atom and atom-plane distances that are relevant to evaluating the quality of the structure.