2- to 20-year myelomeningocele follow-up outcomes from a referral center in Southern Iran: the Shiraz experience.

BACKGROUND: The current convention for treatment of children with myelomeningocele (MMC) is timely surgical intervention combined with long-term follow-up by a multidisciplinary specialized team. This study aims to investigate the outcomes of MMC patients treated at Namazi Hospital. METHODS: All children presenting to Namazi Hospital with myelomeningocele between May 2001 and August 2020 were eligible for this study. For those with a documented telephone number, follow-up phone surveys with the patient's caregivers, on top of the review of the medical documents were carried out to assess mortality, morbidities, and the functional outcome of the care provided to them. RESULTS: A total of 125 patients were studied (62 females). All of the patients were followed up for a mean duration of 6.28 years (range 1-23 years). The majority were located in the lumbosacral area. All of the patients underwent postnatal surgical intervention for MMC in Namazi Hospital. Mean age at surgery was 9.51 days. There were statistically significant differences between urinary and bowel incontinence and presence of scoliosis, MMT grading of the lower limbs, school attendance, number of readmissions, and requirement of laminectomy at the initial surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to characterize the long-term outcomes of MMC patients in Iran. This study illustrates that there is a great need for improved access to and coordination of care in antenatal, perioperative, and long-term stages to improve morbidity and mortality.

Surgical outcomes of myelomeningocele repair: A 20-year experience from a single center in a middle-income country.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spina bifida is the second major cause of congenital disorders and the most common central nervous system congenital malformation compatible with life primarily. Herein, we describe the short-term outcome of post-natal Myelomeningocele (MMC) surgical management and predictors of its postoperative complications and mortality. METHODS: This retrospective chart review studies the children who underwent post-natal surgical management for MMC in Namazi hospital, a tertiary referral center, in southern Iran from May 2001 to September 2020. RESULTS: 248 patients were included in this study. The mean age at the operation was 8.47 ± 8.69 days. The most common site of involvement of MMC was Lumbosacral (86%, n = 204). At the evaluation conducted prior to the operation, cerebrospinal fluid leak was observed in 7% (n=16) of the patients. Postoperatively, 5.7% of the patients expired in the 30-day follow-up after the operation (n = 14), while 24% needed readmission (n = 47). The most common complications leading to readmission were wound dehiscence (n = 10, 42%) and wound purulence (n = 6, 25%). Only the site of the lesion (p-value = 0.035) was associated with postoperative complication. After controlling for potential confounders, the site of the lesion (adjusted odds ratio = 0.146, 95% confidence interval = 0.035-0.610, p-value = 0.008) and age at surgery (adjusted odds ratio = 1.048, 95% confidence interval = 1.002-1.096, p-value = 0.041) were significantly associated with mortality CONCLUSIONS: The age of the patients at the surgery and the site of the lesion are the two factors that were associated with mortality. However, further investigations into preoperative interventions and risk factors to mitigate the risk of complications and mortality are highly encouraged.

Development of a Novel Neurological Score Combining GCS and FOUR Scales for Assessment of Neurosurgical Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: GCS-FOUR Scale.

BACKGROUND: Consciousness assessment is crucial for patients with traumatic brain injury. In this study, we developed a novel scoring system combining the Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and the full outline of unresponsiveness (FOUR) and evaluated its association with the intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, mortality, and functional outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data from patients with traumatic brain injury admitted to the neurosurgical ICU of our institution during a 2-year period. The eye and motor components of the GCS and the brainstem reflex component of the FOUR were used to compute the GCS-FOUR. We performed statistical analysis to demonstrate the association between the GCS, FOUR, and GCS-FOUR and the ICU length of stay, mortality, the development of a persistent vegetative state, and desirable recovery. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients were included. The mean age was 30.6 years, and 89.3% were male. All 3 scores were associated with the ICU length of stay, mortality, a persistent vegetative state, and good recovery. In terms of predicting mortality, the GCS score exhibited a slight superiority compared with the other indexes, and the GCS-FOUR score showed a slight superiority over the other indexes in predicting for good recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The GCS-FOUR is a novel scoring system comparable to the GCS and FOUR regarding its association with functional status after injury, ICU length of stay, and mortality. The GCS-FOUR score provides greater neurological detail than the GCS due to the inclusion of brainstem reflexes, in addition to using the experience of healthcare providers with the GCS score compared with the FOUR in most settings.

COVID-19-associated acute pancreatitis: a systematic review of case reports.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mainly involves the respiratory system but can also affect the digestive system and cause several gastrointestinal manifestations. Acute pancreatitis has been reported as one of the rare presentations of COVID-19. This study aimed to systematically review case reports on COVID-19-associated acute pancreatitis. METHODS: Publications were retrieved through a comprehensive search in four databases on October 1, 2021. Eligible ones that demonstrated the potential association of acute pancreatitis and COVID-19 were included for data extraction. RESULTS: After screening 855 citations, 82 articles containing 95 cases were included, and their data were extracted. The most common presentation was abdominal pain (88/95, 92.6%), followed by nausea/vomiting (61/95, 64.2%). Mortality was reported in 10.5% of cases. The initial presentation was acute pancreatitis, COVID-19, and concomitant in 32.6% (31/95), 48.4% (46/95), and 18.9% (18/95) of cases, respectively. Among the included cases, acute pancreatitis severity was associated with ICU admission, COVID-19 severity, and the outcome. Also, the initial presentation was associated with COVID-19 severity (P values ˂0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence indicates that acute pancreatitis can present before, after, or concomitant with COVID-19. Appropriate investigations should be performed in cases with suspicious clinical presentations. Longitudinal studies should address whether or not, there is a causative relationship between COVID-19 and acute pancreatitis.

A novel scoring system for early assessment of the risk of the COVID-19-associated mortality in hospitalized patients: COVID-19 BURDEN.

BACKGROUND: Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) presentations range from those similar to the common flu to severe pneumonia resulting in hospitalization with significant morbidity and/or mortality. In this study, we made an attempt to develop a predictive scoring model to improve the early detection of high risk COVID-19 patients by analyzing the clinical features and laboratory data available on admission. METHODS: We retrospectively included 480 consecutive adult patients, aged 21-95, who were admitted to Faghihi Teaching Hospital. Clinical and laboratory features were collected from the medical records and analyzed using multiple logistic regression analysis. The final data analysis was utilized to develop a simple scoring model for the early prediction of mortality in COVID-19 patients. The score given to each associated factor was based on the coefficients of the regression analyses. RESULTS: A novel mortality risk score (COVID-19 BURDEN) was derived, incorporating risk factors identified in this cohort. CRP (> 73.1 mg/L), O2 saturation variation (greater than 90%, 84-90%, and less than 84%), increased PT (> 16.2 s), diastolic blood pressure (≤ 75 mmHg), BUN (> 23 mg/dL), and raised LDH (> 731 U/L) were the features constituting the scoring system. The patients are triaged to the groups of low- (score < 4) and high-risk (score ≥ 4) groups. The area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity for predicting mortality in patients with a score of ≥ 4 were 0.831, 78.12%, and 70.95%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Using this scoring system in COVID-19 patients, the patients with a higher risk of mortality can be identified which will help to reduce hospital care costs and improve its quality and outcome.