RESUMO
Genetic workup is becoming increasingly common in the clinical assessment of neurological disorders. We evaluated its yield among middle-aged and elderly neurological patients, in a real-world context. This retrospective study included 368 consecutive Israeli patients aged 50 years and older (202 [54.9%] males), who were referred to a single neurogenetics clinic between 2017 and mid-2023. All had neurological disorders, without a previous molecular diagnosis. Demographic, clinical and genetic data were collected from medical records. The mean age at first genetic counseling at the clinic was 62.3 ± 7.8 years (range 50-85 years), and the main indications for referral were neuromuscular, movement and cerebrovascular disorders, as well as cognitive impairment and dementia. Out of the 368 patients, 245 (66.6%) underwent genetic testing that included exome sequencing (ES), analysis of nucleotide repeat expansions, detection of specific mutations, targeted gene panel sequencing or chromosomal microarray analysis. Overall, 80 patients (21.7%) received a molecular diagnosis due to 36 conditions, accounting for 32.7% of the patients who performed genetic testing. The diagnostic rates were highest for neuromuscular (58/186 patients [31.2%] in this group, 39.2% of 148 tested individuals) and movement disorders (14/79 [17.7%] patients, 29.2% of 48 tested), but lower for other disorders. Testing of nucleotide repeat expansions and ES provided a diagnosis to 28/73 (38.4%) and 19/132 (14.4%) individuals, respectively. Based on our findings, genetic workup and testing are useful in the diagnostic process of neurological patients aged ≥50 years, in particular for those with neuromuscular and movement disorders.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Autosomal dominant Hyper IgE syndrome (AD-HIES) is a rare and complex primary immunodeficiency that affects multiple systems. Mutations in signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) gene cause AD-HIES. These mutations have a dominant-negative effect and the presence of such mutations is associated with a clinical phenotype. We aim to describe genetic and clinical characteristics of patients with AD-HIES in our clinic and to highlight the variability of clinical patterns in the same family. METHODS: We describe six patients, four individuals of the same family and two unrelated patients. All patients were given a clinical score based on disease phenotype according to the National Institute of Health (NIH) score. Mutation analysis of STAT3 was done by PCR amplification of all coding exons followed by bidirectional sequencing using the BigDye kit v1.1 and an ABI3700 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems). RESULTS: All six patients had DNA binding region point mutations: a proband and his three children with p.Phe384Leu mutation, a patient with p.Arg382Trp substitution and a patient with p.Arg382Gln mutation. All of these mutations were previously reported. Patients differed in infectious, immunologic and somatic features. We observed an extreme variability in disease phenotype within the reported family with one genetically affected patient displaying an 'unaffected' phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Although the genetic cause of AD-HIES is known, more studies are required to better understand the possible additional factors that may affect disease expressivity within families and the clinical diversity of the disease.