Comprehensive genomic profiling reveals molecular subsets of ASXL1-mutated myeloid neoplasms.

A large-scale genomic analysis of patients with ASXL1-mutated myeloid disease has not been performed to date. We reviewed comprehensive genomic profiling results from 6043 adults to characterize clinicopathologic features and co-mutation patterns by ASXL1 mutation status. ASXL1 mutations occurred in 1414 patients (23%). Mutation co-occurrence testing revealed strong co-occurrence (p < 0.01) between mutations in ASXL1 and nine genes (SRSF2, U2AF1, RUNX1, SETBP1, EZH2, STAG2, CUX1, CSF3R, CBL). Further analysis of patients with these co-mutations yielded several novel findings. Co-mutation patterns supported that ASXL1/SF3B1 co-mutation may be biologically distinct from ASXL1/non-SF3B1 spliceosome co-mutation. In AML, ASXL1/SRSF2 co-mutated patients frequently harbored STAG2 mutations (42%), which were dependent on the presence of both ASXL1 and SRSF2 mutation (p < 0.05). STAG2 and SETBP1 mutations were also exclusive in ASXL1/SRSF2 co-mutated patients and associated with divergent chronic myeloid phenotypes. Our findings support that certain multi-mutant genotypes may be biologically relevant in ASXL1-mutated myeloid disease.

Comprehensive genomic profiling of histologic subtypes of urethral carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Carcinoma of the urethra (UrthCa) is an uncommon Genitourinary (GU) malignancy that can progress to advanced metastatic disease. METHODS: One hundred twenty-seven metastatic UrthCa underwent hybrid capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling to evaluate all classes of genomic alterations (GA). Tumor mutational burden was determined on up to 1.1 Mbp of sequenced DNA, and microsatellite instability was determined on 114 loci. PD-L1 expression was determined by IHC (Dako 22C3). RESULTS: Forty-nine (39%) urothelial (UrthUC), 31 (24%) squamous (UrthSCC), 24 (19%) adenocarcinomas NOS (UrthAC), and 12 (9%) clear cell (UrthCC) were evaluated. UrthUC and UrthSCC are more common in men; UrthAC and UrthCC are more common in women. Ages were similar in all 4 groups. GA in PIK3CA were the most frequent potentially targetable GA; mTOR pathway GA in PTEN were also identified. GA in other potentially targetable genes were also identified including ERBB2 (6% in UrthUC, 3% in UrthSCC, and 12% in UrthAC), FGFR1-3 (3% in UrthSCC), BRAF (3% in UrthAC), PTCH1 (8% in UrthCC), and MET (8% in UrthCC). Possibly reflecting their higher GA/tumor status, potential for immunotherapy benefit associated with higher tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 staining levels were seen in UrthUC and UrthSCC compared to UrthAC and UrthCC. Microsatellite instability high status was absent throughout. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive genomic profiling reveals GA that may be predictive of both targeted and immunotherapy benefit in patients with advanced UrthCa and that could potentially be used in future adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and metastatic disease trials.

A pan-cancer analysis of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry and gene amplification, tumor mutation burden and microsatellite instability in 48,782 cases.

PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) currently has the most Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals as a companion diagnostic (CDx) for immunotherapies in specific tumor types; however, multiple other immunotherapy biomarkers exist. We performed this study to examine and report the prevalence of PD-L1 expression in a wide variety of tumor types and examine its relationship to microsatellite instability (MSI), tumor mutational burden (TMB), and CD274 (PD-L1) gene amplification. We performed a retrospective analysis of all cases in which both PD-L1 IHC (using the DAKO 22C3 IHC assay with either tumor proportion score (TPS) or combined positive score (CPS); or the VENTANA SP142 assay with infiltrating immune cell score (IC)) and comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) were tested at Foundation Medicine between January 2016 and November 2019. Of note, PD-L1 positivity is defined per the CDx indication and tumor proportion score (TPS ≥ 1) for indications without a CDx claim; and TMB positivity is defined as ≥10 mutations/Mb. A total of 48,782 cases were tested for PD-L1 IHC and CGP. Immune cell expression of PD-L1 was more frequently identified than tumor cell expression of PD-L1. We saw a high correlation between PD-L1 expression and CD274 gene amplification (p < 0.0001), MSI and TMB (p < 0.0001), and PD-L1 and TMB (p < 0.0001). In addition, the combination of PD-L1 and TMB identified four unique disease subsets PD-L1-/TMB-, PD-L1+/TMB-, PD-L1-/TMB+, and PD-L1+/TMB+ with varying prevalence dependent on tumor type. Lastly, 50.3% (24527/48782) of the overall cohort was positive for at least one of the CDx or exploratory biomarkers described above. This is the largest pan-cancer analysis of relevant biomarkers associated with response to checkpoint inhibitors to date, including more than 48,000 cases. Additional clinical trials with treatment outcome data in individual tumor types are needed to determine whether the double positive PD-L1+/TMB+ disease subset would respond best to immunotherapy.