Laparoscopic versus open liver resections for colorectal cancer liver metastases: short term results.

INTRODUCTION: Analysis and comparison of short-term results of laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) and open liver resections (OLR) for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients operated for CRCLM in the time period from May 2007 to May 2019 (12 years) at the department of surgery, University Hospital Hradec Králové and University Hospital Královské Vinohrady. RESULTS: 206 liver resections were performed; 167 (81.1%) OLR and 39 (18.9%) LLR procedures. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in 6 cases (15.4%). LLR was associated with a longer operation time (194±107 min) vs (129±58 min) for OLR. The ICU stay, 3.5±4.3 days for OLR and 4.1±8.1 days for LLR, and the hospital stay, 11.9±8.3 days (OLR) vs 12.1±11.3 days (LLR), were comparable. Perioperative blood loss was lower in the LLR group, 189±166 ml vs 360±410 ml. Total transfusion rate was similar, 10.8% (OLR) vs 12.8% (LLR). Oncologic radicality was also comparable in both groups; negative resection margin was achieved in 78% (OLR) and 80% (LLR). Postoperative morbidity and mortality was comparable in both groups; morbidity was 33% (OLR) vs 31% (LLR), while mortality was 1.8% (OLR) vs 2.6% (LLR). CONCLUSION: LLR for CRCLM provided comparable short-term results compared to OLR in our group of patients even in the learning curve period. However, it should be noted that the study group is a highly selected group of patients.

[An uncommon case of purulent mesenteric lymphadenitis]. / Neobvyklý prípad mezenteriální abscedující lymfadenitidy.

The authors present a case of a middle-aged female with large isolated mesenteric lymphadenitis. Abdominal ultrasonography undertaken as a preventive assessment revealed a solid tumour mass in the left mesogastrium, sized 70x55x55 mm. A solid abdominal tumour such as a GIST or sarcoma was considered and the patient underwent elective laparoscopic surgery. The tumour was completely removed. Histopathological examination confirmed an unexpected result of nonspecific purulent mesenteric lymphadenitis. The authors discuss potential causes of mesenteric lymphadenitis.Key words: abdominal tumour mesenteric lymphadenopathy purulent lymphadenitis - solitary lymphadenopathy.

[Technical background of data collection for parametric observation of total mesorectal excision (TME) in rectal cancer]. / Technické zajistení sberu dat pro parametrické sledování totální mezorektální excize (TME) pro karcinom rekta.

INTRODUCTION: Improvement in any human activity is preconditioned by inspection of results and providing feedback used for modification of the processes applied. Comparison of experts experience in the given field is another indispensable part leading to optimisation and improvement of processes, and optimally to implementation of standards. For the purpose of objective comparison and assessment of the processes, it is always necessary to describe the processes in a parametric way, to obtain representative data, to assess the achieved results, and to provide unquestionable and data-driven feedback based on such analysis. This may lead to a consensus on the definition of standards in the given area of health care. METHOD: Total mesorectal excision (TME) is a standard procedure of rectal cancer (C20) surgical treatment. However, the quality of performed procedures varies in different health care facilities, which is given, among others, by internal processes and surgeons experience. Assessment of surgical treatment results is therefore of key importance. A pathologist who assesses the resected tissue can provide valuable feedback in this respect. RESULTS: An information system for the parametric assessment of TME performance is described in our article, including technical background in the form of a multicentre clinical registry and the structure of observed parameters. CONCLUSION: We consider the proposed system of TME parametric assessment as significant for improvement of TME performance, aimed at reducing local recurrences and at improving the overall prognosis of patients. KEY WORDS: rectal cancer total mesorectal excision parametric data clinical registries TME registry.

[Parametric monitoring of the quality of total mesorectal excision and surgical treatment of rectal carcinoma results of a multicenter study]. / Parametrické sledování kvality totální mezorektální excize a chirurgické lécby karcinomu rekta výsledky multicentrické studie.

INTRODUCTION: Tumour size and the quality of its complete surgical removal are the main prognostic factors in rectal cancer treatment. The number of postoperative local recurrences depends on whether the mesorectum has been completely removed - total mesorectal excision (TME) - and whether tumour-free resection margins have been achieved. The surgery itself and its quality depend on the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis and detection of risk areas in the rectum and mesorectum, on the surgeons skills, and finally on pathological assessment evaluating whether complete tumour excision has been accomplished including circumferential margins of the tumour, and whether mesorectal excision is complete. The aim of our study was to implement and standardize a new method of evaluation of the quality of the surgical procedure - TME - in rectal cancer treatment using an assessment of its circumferential margins (CRO) and completeness of the excision. METHODS: The study consisted of two parts. The first, multi-centre retrospective phase with 288 patients analysed individual partial parameters of the diagnosis, operations and histological examinations of the rectal cancer. Critical points were identified and a unified follow-up protocol was prepared. In the second, prospective part of this study 600 patients were monitored parametrically focusing on the quality of the TME and its effect on the oncological treatment results. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with restaging following neoadjuvant therapy increased from 60.0% to 81.7% based on preoperative diagnosis. The number of specimens missing an assessment of the mesorectal excision quality decreased from 52.9% in the retrospective part of to the study to 22.8% in the prospective part. The proportion of actually complete TMEs rose from 22.6% to 26.0%, and that of nearly complete TMEs from 10.1% to 24.0%. CONCLUSION: The introduction of parametric monitoring into routine clinical practice improved the quality of pre-treatment and preoperative diagnosis, examination of the tissue specimen, and consequently improved quality of the surgical procedure was achieved. KEY WORDS: rectal cancer TME - parametric monitoring - quality control.

Endovascular Management of Acute Embolic Occlusion of the Superior Mesenteric Artery: A 12-Year Single-Centre Experience.

PURPOSE: Retrospective evaluation of 12-year experience with endovascular management of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) due to embolic occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2003 to 2014, we analysed the in-hospital mortality of 37 patients with acute mesenteric embolism who underwent primary endovascular therapy with subsequent on-demand laparotomy. Transcatheter embolus aspiration was used in all 37 patients (19 women, 18 men, median age 76 years) with embolic occlusion of the SMA. Adjunctive local thrombolysis (n = 2) and stenting (n = 2) were also utilised. RESULTS: We achieved complete recanalization of the SMA stem in 91.9 %. One patient was successfully treated by surgical embolectomy due to a failed endovascular approach. Subsequent exploratory laparotomy was performed in 73.0 % (n = 27), and necrotic bowel resection in 40.5 %. The total in-hospital mortality was 27.0 %. CONCLUSION: Primary endovascular therapy for acute embolic SMA occlusion with on-demand laparotomy is a recommended algorithm used in our centre to treat SMA occlusion. This combined approach for the treatment of AMI is associated with in-hospital mortality rate of 27.0 %.

[Current status in the treatment of rectal cancer in the Czech Republic regarding the rate of complete pathological response after neoadjuvant therapy--PATOD C20 study 2011-2012]. / Soucasný stav strategie lécby karcinomu rekta v Ceské republice s ohledem na výskyt kompletní patologické odpovedi pri neoadjuvantní lécbe--studie PATOD C20 2011-2012.

INTRODUCTION: Deciding on the strategy in rectal cancer´s treatment requires a complex and multidisciplinary approach. The primary rectal resection is indicated in early stages, while locally advanced tumors should be pretreated by one of the modes of neoadjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy. The main goal of this study was to explore the therapeutic strategy in patients with rectal cancer in the Czech Republic. The second aim was to determine the incidence of the pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter clinical study, which includes data from all patients with rectal cancer who were treated at participating centers in the period from 01/01/2011 to 31/12/2012. The required data has been passed into the online registry PATOD C20.Three issues have been set up: 1. Characteristics of the center and cooperation with the oncological department; 2. Characteristics of the treatment of patients with rectal cancer; and 3. Detailed analysis of the group of patients with complete pathological response. The analysis was performed with regard to the nature of individual departments, i.e. departments of surgery in university hospitals with complex oncological centres, departments of surgery within complex oncologic centers, and departments of surgery outside complex oncologic centers. RESULTS: In total, 21 departments of surgery in the Czech Republic provided data about 1860 patients with rectal cancer for the study. The treatment strategy for rectal cancer was determined at multidisciplinary seminars at 19 centers (90.5%). Statistically significant differences between the centers were found in the indication for neoadjuvant treatment (p<0.001), rectal resection with anastomosis (p=0.048), and resection without anastomosis (p=0.022). Complete pathological response was found in 61 (8.7%) patients. Positivity of mesorectal lymph nodes (ypN+) was found in the case of ypT0 stage in 7 (9.7%) patients. CONCLUSION: PATOD study showed that therapy of rectal cancer is highly heterogeneous in the Czech Republic. Despite the best conditions provided, university hospitals and large departments within complex oncologic centers do not fully utilize this benefit.

Small carcinomas involving less than one-quarter of the rectal circumference: local excision is still associated with a high risk of nodal positivity.

AIM: A study was carried out to determine the relationship between mesorectal lymph nodal involvement and T stage in a group of patients with a rectal cancer involving less than one-quarter of the rectal circumference, such as might be selected for local excision. METHOD: The data of patients having rectal resection between 2010 and 2014 were prospectively entered in a rectal carcinoma registry. A model for describing tumours involving less than one quadrant of the rectal circumference was created to facilitate the evaluation process. RESULTS: In all, 304 patients were included in the study. In 68 (22.4%) a small tumour (< 1 quadrant involved) was found. Of these, 26.5% had positive mesorectal lymph nodes (N+). In lesions of Stage ypT0 cancer 12.5% patients were node positive, in Stage Tis and T1 tumours there was no case of node positivity, but in Stage T2 and Stage T3 cancers the incidence of node positivity was 27.5% and 64%. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that, even for small tumours involving only one rectal quadrant, the risk of lymph nodal involvement was about 25%. Had the patients undergone local excision the treatment would have been incomplete.

[Predicting pN positivity in T3 rectal cancer]. / Moznosti predikce pN pozitivity u T3 nádoru rekta.

INTRODUCTION: Stage pN+ is a factor which determines the strategy for treatment of T3 rectal cancer. The sensitivity of preoperative imaging examinations revealing N+ is not entirely satisfactory. Risk factors that are associated with pT3pN+ stage and that are detectable by preoperative examination have not been reliably identified. The aim of the study is to analyze the predictive factors determining lymph node involvement in T3 rectal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with rectal resection for (y)pT3 rectal cancer were analysed. All of the surgical interventions were performed at the Department of Surgery, University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, from 1 January 2011 to 28 February 2014. Data were prospectively collected and saved in the Rectal Cancer Oncologic Register. The parameters studied were age, gender, tumour localisation and its circumferential topography, preoperative chemoradiotherapy, absolute number of harvested lymph nodes and the number of positive lymph nodes in each specimen, tumour grading, presence of lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion, and the depth of tumour penetration. RESULTS: After selection, 89 patients with T3 rectal cancer were included into the study. Resection for cancer of the upper rectum was performed in 22 (24.7%) patients, middle rectum in 37 (41.6 %) and lower rectum in 30 (33.7%) patients. 38 (42.7%) patients underwent primary operation, 41 (46.1%) patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and radiation therapy was administered to only 10 (11.2%) patients. Stage pN+ was found in 51 (57.3%) patients. Statistical analysis was used to identify the risk factors for pN+: lymphovascular invasion (p0.001), angioinvasion (p=0.030) and perineural invasion (p=0.010). On the border of statistical significance for pN+, low grading of the tumour (p=0.084) was found. The depth of penetration of the tumour into the mesorectum was not statistically significant (p=0.230). CONCLUSION: Our study has shown that pN positivity is associated with lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion and low grading of the tumour. Accurate identification of these factors before treatment, however, remains very difficult.

[Complicated mesenteric ischaemia]. / Komplikovaná mezenteriální ischemie.

Acute mesenteric ischaemia is a serious condition associated with high morbidity and mortality. Atherosclerosis is one of the most frequent etiologic factors. This case report presents a patient suffering from acute mesenteric ischaemia complicated by acute lower limb ischaemia and post-ischaemic stenosis of the ileum. Such a patient requires a multidisciplinary, comprehensive, and, in some cases, phased approach to solve complications brought about especially by generalized atherosclerosis.

[Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome]. / Entrapment syndrom podkolenní tepny.

Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome is a rare cause of lower limb ischaemia. It is caused by an abnormal relationship between popliteal artery and its surrounding musculotendineous structures (anatomic entrapment). Functional popliteal entrapment is characterized by normal anatomic relationships within popliteal fossa. The true incidence is unknown, it usually affects young patients, typically men, and is clinically presented with symptoms of calf claudication, calf cramping, coldness and paresthesia. CT angiography and MR angiography have become an imaging technique of choice. The mainstay surgical procedure is popliteal artery release. In cases of popliteal artery damage autologous saphenous vein bypass grafting offers the best long-term results. Authors on the basis of two case reports describe the clinical course, diagnosis and surgical technique used in the treatment of patients with advanced popliteal artery entrapmentsyndrome.

[Pilonidal sinus - possibilities surgical treatment]. / Pilonidální sinus - moznosti operacního resení

INTRODUCTION: Pilonidal sinus is a skin disease affecting the sacrococcygeal region caused by chronic irritation of the skin by ingrowing hairs that get pushed into skin sinuses and follicles. The acute form of the disease which is presented by subcutaneous abscesses very often develops into chronic suppurative subcutaneous fistula. The incidence of pilonidal sinus is approximately 26/100,000 people. Radical surgical excision using skin flaps is essential for successful treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The results of surgical treatment were analysed retrospectively. All surgical procedures evaluated were performed at the Department of Surgery, University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, from January 2010 to June 2014. The parameters analysed were gender, age, method used to close the defect, length of hospital stay, overall morbidity including pilonidal sinuses recurrence. RESULTS: 141 patients undergoing radical excision for pilonidal sinus were analysed. Primary suture was used in 101 (71.6%) patients. Limberg flap reconstruction was performed in 16 (11.3%) patients and Karydakis procedure was used in 24 (17.0%) patients. The length of hospital stay was 4.2 days. 19 operations were performed for recurrent pilonidal sinus. Norecurrence occurred after Karydakis procedure, there were 3 cases of recurrence after Limberg flap reconstruction, and 8 patients experienced recurrence after primary suture. The overall incidence of recurrence was 7.8%. Surgical site complications were recorded mostly after primary suture (37 patients, 26.2%). Conversely, surgical site complications appeared in the Limberg flap group in 2 patients (12.5%) and in theKarydakis procedure group in 1 patient (4.2%). CONCLUSION: Limberg flap reconstruction and Karydakis procedure lead to better results in pilonidal sinus surgery, especially as regards lower recurrence rates and overall morbidity. Both of these procedures are relatively easy to perform and technically undemanding.

[The role of drains in pancreatic surgery]. / Význam drénu v pankreatické chirurgii.

Pancreatic fistula is a significant complication following pancreatic resection. Several methods aimed at lowering the postoperative pancreatic fistula rate were studied in the past. These methods mainly include pharmacological prophylaxis and technical modifications of pancreatic remnant management. Another method which can influence postoperative pancreatic fistula rate is the use of and the manipulation with intra-abdominal drains following pancreatic resection. Recent studies have shown that the use of the drains, the type of drain and manipulation with the drains can influence the outcomes. The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge about the use of drains in pancreatic surgery. There are three questions to ask when studying the use of drains in pancreatic surgery: 1) Whether to use the drains at all 2) When to remove the drains? 3) Which type of the drain is more appropriate? Ad 1) Despite the growing number of studies showing comparable or even better results in patients without intra-abdominal drains following pancreatic resection, the latest randomized study proved that avoiding the use of drains is associated with more clinically significant postoperative complications and higher postoperative mortality. It is also important to consider the risk factors of pancreatic fistula development, especially pancreatic texture and the main pancreatic duct diameter. Currently, pancreatic resection without intra-abdominal drains cannot be routinely recommended. Ad 2) Two studies addressed the question when to remove the drains after pancreatic resection, and both studies clearly showed that early removal brings better results. Ad 3) No study has specifically addressed the question whether the type of drain can influence the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula and of other complications. Gravity drains and closed-suction drains are most commonly used nowadays. The closed-suction drains are more effective due to the active suction. On the other hand, active suction can cause leak of the amylase-rich fluid through the pancreatic anastomosis or suture line and thus promote the development of pancreatic fistula or even worsen its clinical significance. There are no data in the literature so far regarding the type of drain. Therefore, we have commenced a randomized control trial which aims to compare closed-suction drains and closed gravity drains.

[Influence of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on changes of epidermal growth factor receptor expression in patients treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy for local advanced rectal carcinoma]. / Vliv predoperacní chemoradioterapie na zmenu exprese receptoru pro epidermální rustový faktor u pacientu lécených predoperacní chemoradioterapií pro lokálne pokrocilý karcinom rekta.

AIM: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the prognostic impact of expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) changes during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and three patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma of stage II and III were evaluated. All patients were administered the total dose of 44 --  50.4 Gy. Concomitantly, the patients received capecitabine in the dose 825 mg/ m² in two daily oral administrations or 5- fluorouracil in the dose 200 mg/ m² in continuous infusion. Surgery was indicated at intervals of 4-8 weeks from chemoradiotherapy completion. EGFR expression in the pretreatment biopsies and in resected specimens was assessed with immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: All of 103 patients received radiotherapy without interruption up to the total planned dose. Downstaging was described in 64 patients. Six patients had complete pathologic remission. Recurrence occurred in 49 patients. Local recurrence was found in 22 patients, generalization of disease was reported in 27 patients. A total of 51 patients died. Increased EGFR expression was found in 26 patients. The statistically significantly shorter overall survival (p < 0.001) and disease-free survival (p < 0.001) was found in patients with increased expression of EGFR compared with patients where no increase in the expression of EGFR was observed during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The overexpression of EGFR during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma is associated with significant shorter overall survival and disease-free survival.

[Basic principles of diagnosis and treatment of secondary peritonitis - recommendations of experts with the support of SIS]. / Základní principy diagnostiky a lécby sekundární peritonitidy - doporucení odborníku s podporou SIS.

Secondary peritonitis is the most common cause of inflammatory acute abdomen treated at general surgery departments. Only early and correct diagnosis may improve the prognosis of these patients. The authors compiled an interdisciplinary review of the basic principles of diagnosis and treatment of secondary peritonitis, which reflects current findings supported by evidence-based medicine. The work is based on published international literature but also shares opinions and experiences of the selected specialists. The presented work in its extent is not meant to substitute an in-depth study of the issue, but to allow a basic and quick review of the topic.

Solid pseudopapillary tumour of the pancreas: diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Solid pseudopapillary tumour (SPT) of the pancreas is a relatively rare entity which most commonly occurs in young women. In this paper we report our clinical experience together with the current knowledge on the diagnostics, treatment and prognosis of this rare tumour. METHODS: We reviewed hospital records of patients diagnosed with a solid pseudopapillary tumour of the pancreas between January 2002 and December 2011 at the Department of Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. Clinical, operative, pathological data were obtained on all the patients. RESULTS: Over the 10-year period of the study we performed 181 planned pancreatic resections in our department. Overall, the 30-day postoperative mortality rate in this series of patients was 2.2%. SPT was diagnosed in 4 cases. All the patients were women and the average age was 34 years. Preoperative endosonography with biopsy sample was performed in all the patients and the diagnosis of SPT was known in all the patients before the surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The current knowledge of SPT is based only on case reports and small series. It typically occurs in young women and therefore the presence of a large pancreatic mass in a young woman may suggest a diagnosis of SPT. SPT has a low malignant potential and the prognosis is excellent following complete surgical resection in the majority of the cases.

[Evaluation of safe resection margins in rectal carcinoma]. / Problematika stanovení bezpecných resekcních okraju u karcinomu rekta.

The fact that surgically well performed total mesorectal excision with negative circumferential resection margin represents one of the most important prognostic factors in colorectal carcinoma is already well known. These parameters significantly affect the incidence of local tumour recurrence as well as distant metastasis, and are thus related to the duration of patient survival. The surgeons task is to perform mesorectal excision as completely as possible, i.e., to remove the rectum with an intact cylinder of mesorectal fat. The approach of the pathologist to evaluation of total mesorectal excision specimens differs greatly from that of resection specimens from other parts of the large bowel. Besides evaluation of the usual parameters for colon cancer staging, it is essential to assess certain additional factors specific to rectal carcinomas, namely tumour distance from circumferential (radial) resection margins and the quality of the mesorectal excision. In order to accurately evaluate these parameters, knowledge of a wide range of clinical data is indispensable (results of preoperative imaging, intraoperative findings). For objective evaluation of these parameters it is necessary to introduce standardized procedures for resection specimen processing and macro and microscopic examination. This approach is based mainly on standardized macroscopic photo-documentation of the integrity of the mesorectal surface. Parallel transverse sections of the resection specimens are made with targeted tissue sampling for histological examination. It is essential to have close cooperation between surgeons and pathologists within a multidisciplinary team enabling mutual feedback.

[The radicality of surgical resection in rectal cancer. Analysis of factors associated with incomplete mesorectal excision]. / Radikalita resekcní lécby pro karcinom rekta Analýza prediktivních faktoru spojených s nekompletní mezorektální excizí

INTRODUCTION: Circumferential resection margin (pCRM) and the completeness of mesorectal excision (ME) are two independent prognostic factors significantly associated with the radicality of surgical treatment. Positive pCRM and incomplete mesorectal excision are associated with a significantly higher incidence of local recurrence and worse patient prognosis. The aim of this article is to analyze the risk factors associated with incomplete mesorectal excision. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients operated on at the Department of Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove between January 2011 and February 2013 were included in the study. The patients data were prospectively collected and entered in the Dg C20 registry. The following factors were analyzed: sex, age, BMI, cN, pT, clinical stage, the involved segment of the rectum, neoadjuvant therapy, circumferential tumour location, the type of surgical approach and the type of surgery. RESULTS: 168 patients were operated on during the above period. 9 (5.3%) palliative stomas and 159 (94.6%) resection procedures were performed in this group of 168 patients. 7 (4.4%) patients were excluded because the quality of excision was not assessed in them. 114 (75%) resections, including 5 intersphincteric resections, were performed in the group of the remaining 152 patients. 10 (7%) were Hartmanns procedures a 28 (18%) were amputation procedures. Out of 152 procedures, 69 (45%) were performed laparoscopically. Positive (y)pCRO was recorded in 26 (17%) patients, predominantly after abdominoperineal resection (APR) - 11 out of 27 (41%), and Hartmanns operation - 6 out of 10 (60%). Incomplete ME was observed in 45 patients (30%), complete ME in 81 patients (53%) and partially complete in 26 patients (17%). Univariate analysis confirmed statistically significant factors associated with incomplete mesorectal excision: (y)pT (P = 0.00027), type of surgery (P = 0.00001) and tumour location (P = 0.00001). Multivariate analysis then confirmed two independent prognostic factors associated with incomplete mesorectal excision. It was the location of the tumour in the distal third of the rectum and the (y)pT stage of the tumour. CONCLUSION: Distal rectum tumor location and higher (y)pT are associated with a higher risk of incomplete mesorectal excision with worse patient prognosis.

[Rectal cancer within 10 cm. Comparison of the radicality of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques with regard to the circumferential resection margin and the completeness of mesorectal excision]. / Karcinom rekta do 10 cm Srovnání radikality laparoskopické a otevrené operacní techniky s ohledem na cirkumferentní resekcní okraj a na kompletnost mezorektální excize.

INTRODUCTION: The issue of achieving radical circumferential margin in laparoscopic rectal surgery has not yet been satisfactorily clarified. In this paper we have focused on circumferential margin assessment and the quality of the mesorectal excision, comparing laparoscopic and open resection for cancer of the middle and lower rectum. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The results of surgical procedures for middle and low rectal cancer were analysed. All the interventions were performed at the Department of Surgery, Teaching Hospital in Hradec Kralove, during the period from January 2011 to December 2012. The data were prospectively collected and entered in the Rectal Cancer Registry. Age, gender, BMI, tumour localisation and topography, the clinical stage, preoperative chemoradiotherapy and response to it, the type of surgery, distal and circumferential margin characteristics, mesorectal excision quality, pT and pN were compared for laparoscopic and open surgery. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients were operated on for rectal cancer during the abovementioned period. 94 patients were included in the trial following selection. Laparoscopy was used in 40 patients and open surgery in 54 patients. Laparoscopic approach was performed in 33 (82.5%) low anterior resections (including four intersphincteric resections), 6 (15%) abdominoperineal amputations and 1 (2.5%) Hartmanns procedure. Open surgery was used for 26 (48.1%) low anterior resections, 21 (38.9%) APR and 7 (13%) Hartmanns procedures. Complete mesorectal excision was achieved in 45% of the laparoscopic resections vs. 46.3% of open resections. Nearly complete excision was performed in 22.5% and 11.1%, respectively. Finally, incomplete excision was described in 30% vs. 38.9%. No available data for TME was detected in three patients. The differences in TME were not statistically significant. Positive circumferential margin was found in 5 (12.5%) patients in the laparoscopy group; on the contrary, in the group undergoing open surgery, pCRO+ was found in 15 (27.8%) patients. Here, too, the results were not statistically significant. When patients without preoperative chemoradiotherapy were excluded, the relationship between ypCRM in the laparoscopy and open surgery group was on the border of statistical significance (Fischer=0.0556). CONCLUSION: As has been shown in our trial, the outcomes of laparoscopic and open approach in rectal cancer treatment are very similar. Particularly, mesorectal excision quality and negative CRM results have proven that the laparoscopic technique is safe and comparable to open surgery in rectal cancer treatment.