RESUMO
Certain patient profile characteristics, such as preexisting medical conditions, can modify the risk of developing SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia among adults vaccinated and not vaccinated against pneumococcal disease. This retrospective cohort study aimed to quantify the risk of pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2 among individuals from 15 to 64 years old with and without pneumococcal vaccination in Spain during the 2020-2021 influenza season and establish a risk profile of patients more likely to develop SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Data (demographic information, patient medical history, and lifestyle habits) were gathered both directly from the patient via personal interview and by reviewing electronic medical records. In an adjusted analysis for pneumococcal vaccinated patients, visits to hospital outpatient clinics were protective while visits to primary health care services, being widowed, obese, and not using masks in outdoor open spaces were identified as risk factors. For patients who had not received a pneumococcal vaccine, visits to hospital outpatient clinics were protective, while being overweight or obese, alcohol consumption, and not using masks in outdoor open spaces were identified as risk factors. Concerning comorbidities, in the pneumococcal vaccinated group none were found to be protective but having diabetes or other respiratory diseases were identified as risk factors. In the unvaccinated group, undergoing immunosuppressive treatment and having metastatic tumors were protective factors, while cerebrovascular disease and obesity with a BMI ≥ 40 were risk factors. A similar risk profile for developing SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in pneumococcal vaccinated and non-vaccinated individuals was found. Generally, vaccinated individuals had a lower risk of developing SARS-CoV-2. The findings suggest that vaccination against S. pneumoniae could prevent and reduce SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Additionally, this study has identified individuals with other medical conditions, such as obesity, underweight, diabetes, and a history of respiratory diseases, who are at an increased risk of developing SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and could benefit from vaccination and supervision.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Serratia marcescens (SM) may cause nosocomial outbreaks in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU). We describe an outbreak of SM in a NICU and propose additional prevention and control recommendations. METHODS: Between March 2019 and January 2020, samples were taken from patients in the NICU (rectal, pharyngeal, axillary and other locations) and from 15 taps and their sinks. Control measures were implemented including thorough cleaning of incubators, health education to staff and neonates'relatives, and use of single-dose containers. PFGE was performed in 19 isolates from patients and in 5 environmental samples. RESULTS: From the first case in March 2019 to the detection of the outbreak, a month elapsed. Finally, 20 patients were infected and 5 colonized. 80% of infected neonates had conjunctivitis, 25% bacteremia, 15% pneumonia, 5% wound infection, and 5% urinary tract infection. Six neonates had two foci of infection. Among the 19 isolates studied, 18 presented the same pulsotype and only one of the isolates from the sinkhole showed a clonal relationship with those of the outbreak. Initial measures established were ineffective to control de outbreak and were implemented with exhaustive cleaning, use of individual eye drops, environmental sampling and changing sinks. CONCLUSION: This outbreak presented a high number of neonates affected due to its late detection and torpid evolution. The microorganisms isolated from the neonates were related to an environmental isolate. Additional prevention and control measures are proposed, including routine weekly microbiological sampling.
RESUMO
Bacterial resistance to antibiotics has proven difficult to control over the past few decades. The large group of multidrug-resistant bacteria includes carbapenemase-producing bacteria (CPB), for which limited therapeutic options and infection control measures are available. Furthermore, carbapenemases associate with high-risk clones that are defined by the sequence type (ST) to which each bacterium belongs. The objectives of this cross-sectional and retrospective study were to describe the CPB population isolated in a third-level hospital in Southern Spain between 2015 and 2020 and to establish the relationship between the ST and the epidemiological situation defined by the hospital. CPB were microbiologically studied in all rectal and pharyngeal swabs and clinical samples received between January 2015 and December 2020, characterizing isolates using MicroScan and mass spectrometry. Carbapenemases were detected by PCR and Sanger sequencing, and STs were assigned by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Isolates were genetically related by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis using Xbal, Spel, or Apal enzymes. The episodes in which each CPB was isolated were recorded and classified as involved or non-involved in an outbreak. There were 320 episodes with CPB during the study period: 18 with K. pneumoniae, 14 with Klebisella oxytoca, 9 with Citrobacter freundii, 11 with Escherichia coli, 46 with Enterobacter cloacae, 70 with Acinetobacter baumannii, and 52 with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The carbapenemase groups detected were OXA, VIM, KPC, and NDM with various subgroups. Synchronous relationships were notified between episodes of K. pneumoniae and outbreaks for ST15, ST258, ST307, and ST45, but not for the other CPB. There was a major increase in infections with CPB over the years, most notably during 2020, coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic. This study highlights the usefulness of gene sequencing techniques to control the spread of these microorganisms, especially in healthcare centers. These techniques offer faster results, and a reduction in their cost may make their real-time application more feasible. The combination of epidemiological data with real-time molecular sequencing techniques can provide a major advance in the transmission control of these CPB and in the management of infected patients. Real-time sequencing is essential to increase precision and thereby control outbreaks and target infection prevention measures in a more effective manner.
RESUMO
The objective of this study was to determine clinical-epidemiological characteristics of the patients and the genetic characteristics of carbapenemase KPC-3-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates belonging to sequence type ST258. The eligible study population was all patients with isolates detected between October 2015 and March 2017. Clinical-epidemiological and microbiological data were gathered on risk factors associated with infection by this clone. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using MicroScan system and diffusion in agar. Genes encoding carbapenemases were detected using PCR and Sanger sequencing. The sequence type was assigned by MLST, and the genetic relationship among clinical isolates was determined by pulsed field electrophoresis and by analysis of the genetic environment. The study included 23 individuals with isolates of KPC-3/ST258; the mean age was 77 year, and mean stay pre-isolation was 32 days; 81% received empirical antimicrobial treatment. Isolates were only susceptible to gentamicin (CIM ≤ 2 mg/L), tigecycline (CIM ≤ 1 mg/L), and colistin (CIM ≤ 2 mg/L). The isolates belonged to ST258, with five pulse types or subgroups. All isolates showed amplification of KPC, which was identified as KPC-3 variant. Gene blaKPC-3 was flanked by insertion sequences Kpn6 and Kpn7 within Tn4401 transposon isoform a. We report, for the first time in Spain, an 18-month outbreak by KPC-3-producing ST258 K. pneumoniae. Its acquisition was associated with a history of antimicrobial therapy, with three treatment options, and with high mortality. The detection of different pulse types is attributable to different introductions of the clone in our setting, supporting the need for multi-resistant isolate surveillance studies.
Assuntos
Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Surtos de Doenças , Infecções por Klebsiella/epidemiologia , Infecções por Klebsiella/microbiologia , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , beta-Lactamases/genética , Hospitais , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/classificação , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Tipagem de Sequências Multilocus , Filogenia , Filogeografia , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Fatores de Risco , Espanha/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of repeated vaccination for influenza to prevent severe cases remains unclear. We evaluated the effectiveness of influenza vaccination on preventing admissions to hospital for influenza and reducing disease severity. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study in 20 hospitals in Spain during the 2013/14 and 2014/15 influenza seasons. Community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older who were admitted to hospital for laboratory-confirmed influenza were matched with inpatient controls by sex, age, hospital and admission date. The effectiveness of vaccination in the current and 3 previous seasons in preventing influenza was estimated for inpatients with nonsevere influenza and for those with severe influenza who were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) or who died. RESULTS: We enrolled 130 inpatients with severe and 598 with nonsevere influenza who were matched to 333 and 1493 controls, respectively. Compared with patients who were unvaccinated in the current and 3 previous seasons, adjusted effectiveness of influenza vaccination in the current and any previous season was 31% (95% confidence interval [CI] 13%-46%) in preventing admission to hospital for nonsevere influenza, 74% (95% CI 42%-88%) in preventing admissions to ICU and 70% (95% CI 34%-87%) in preventing death. Vaccination in the current season only had no significant effect on cases of severe influenza. Among inpatients with influenza, vaccination in the current and any previous season reduced the risk of severe outcomes (adjusted odds ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.26-0.76). INTERPRETATION: Among older adults, repeated vaccination for influenza was twice as effective in preventing severe influenza compared with nonsevere influenza in patients who were admitted to hospital, which is attributable to the combination of the number of admissions to hospital for influenza that were prevented and reduced disease severity. These results reinforce recommendations for annual vaccination for influenza in older adults.