Academic Half Day Improves Resident Perception of Education Without Compromising Patient Safety.

BACKGROUND: Residency programs are required to offer a didactic curriculum and protect resident time for education. Our institution implemented an academic half day (AHD) in the 2021-2022 academic year to address issues related to the standard noon conference series. OBJECTIVE: Determine the impact of AHD implementation on education, patient safety, and workflow. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-site educational intervention study. Pre- and post-implementation surveys and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) surveys assessed changes in trainee and faculty attitudes and behaviors. Patient safety and workflow were evaluated by comparing the number of safety event reports, rapid response team activations, time to admission from the ED, and time of discharge on AHD days compared to other weekdays. RESULTS: Survey response rates were: residents 68%/48%, fellows 42%/35%, and faculty 59%/29%. AHD was associated with a significant, positive change in resident attitudes and experiences and on ACGME survey items. On AHDs compared with other weekdays, there were no significant differences in safety event report rates (P = .98), nor in rapid response team activation rates (P = .99). There was not a clinically meaningful difference in median admission time from the ED on AHD weekdays (125 minutes) compared to other weekdays (130 minutes, P = .04). There was no significant difference in median discharge time on AHD vs other weekdays (P = .13). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that there is no significant difference in patient safety or workflow with the implementation of AHD. This study supports prior studies that residents strongly prefer AHD. AHD may be a useful framework for resident education without compromising patient care.

Caregiver Perspectives on Social Needs Screening and Interventions in an Urban Children's Hospital.

OBJECTIVES: Caregiver opinions of inpatient social needs screening and ways of addressing positive screens are not well understood. We aimed to explore caregiver perspectives and goals surrounding inpatient screening and determine how helpful provided resources are at meeting these goals. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with caregivers of pediatric patients admitted to an urban tertiary care children's hospital from April to August 2021. English- and Spanish-speaking caregivers who screened positive for at least 1 social need on a standardized 10-item questionnaire were invited to participate in an interview 2 to 4 months after discharge. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by 2 independent coders using rapid qualitative methods. RESULTS: We completed 20 interviews, with 14 English-speaking and 6 Spanish-speaking caregivers. Four themes emerged: (1) All caregivers expressed support for inpatient social needs screening. (2) Many caregivers cited it as an effective means to support families and help providers better understand their social situation. (3) Caregivers who recalled receiving a resource packet found it useful and at times even shared the resources with others. (4) The majority of caregivers expressed interest in longitudinal support, such as contact after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers are in support of inpatient screening as a means for providers to optimize comprehensive care that explores how unmet social needs influence health. Although inpatient social work and resource packets may be helpful, longitudinal support after discharge may improve the effectiveness of social needs interventions, patient outcomes, and caregiver satisfaction.

Factors Associated With Hospitalization in Children and Adolescents With SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

In this retrospective study of 319 children with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, we assessed whether age, asthma, obesity, diabetes, and socioeconomic status were associated with hospitalization for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed using univariate statistics, excluding incidental or unrelated positives. There was a bimodal distribution of age among hospitalized children. Obesity (P < .001) and a past medical history of diabetes (P = .001) were significantly more prevalent in hospitalized children, including cases of new-onset diabetes and diabetic ketoacidosis. Neither a past medical history of asthma nor lower socioeconomic status was associated with hospitalization. Although limited to a single center, the findings in this study may have important clinical implications. Targeted, proactive health outreach to children with obesity and diabetes, with prioritization of preventative efforts such as vaccination, may be important in preventing worse SARS-CoV-2 infection in this vulnerable group.

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Clinical Syndromes and Predictors of Disease Severity in Hospitalized Children and Youth.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the demographic and clinical features of pediatric severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) syndromes and identify admission variables predictive of disease severity. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, and prospective study of pediatric patients hospitalized with acute SARS-CoV-2 infections and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) at 8 sites in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut. RESULTS: We identified 281 hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections and divided them into 3 groups based on clinical features. Overall, 143 (51%) had respiratory disease, 69 (25%) had MIS-C, and 69 (25%) had other manifestations including gastrointestinal illness or fever. Patients with MIS-C were more likely to identify as non-Hispanic black compared with patients with respiratory disease (35% vs 18%, P = .02). Seven patients (2%) died and 114 (41%) were admitted to the intensive care unit. In multivariable analyses, obesity (OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.26-9.10, P = .02) and hypoxia on admission (OR 4.01; 95% CI 1.14-14.15; P = .03) were predictive of severe respiratory disease. Lower absolute lymphocyte count (OR 8.33 per unit decrease in 109 cells/L, 95% CI 2.32-33.33, P = .001) and greater C-reactive protein (OR 1.06 per unit increase in mg/dL, 95% CI 1.01-1.12, P = .017) were predictive of severe MIS-C. Race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status were not predictive of disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: We identified variables at the time of hospitalization that may help predict the development of severe SARS-CoV-2 disease manifestations in children and youth. These variables may have implications for future prognostic tools that inform hospital admission and clinical management.

The Impact of Parental Presence on Trainee Education During PICU Rounds: A Brief Report.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of parental presence on the number and types of educational questions asked of and by medical trainees during PICU rounds. METHODS: An investigator joined bedside rounds in a 14-bed medical-surgical PICU on 20 weekdays between December 2016 and June 2017. For each patient, the investigator recorded the time devoted to education. Educational questions were recorded verbatim. Questions were categorized as "teaching" (senior team member to a trainee) or "learning" (trainee to a more senior team member) and by content (eg, physiology, imaging, prognosis). Two blinded investigators independently assigned codes to each educational question; discrepancies were resolved to the satisfaction of both. RESULTS: Data include 151 patient-specific rounding events, involving 92 patients. At least 1 parent attended the entirety of 59/151 rounding events (39%). There were no significant differences between the duration of education or the number of educational questions asked when parents were present (1 minute; 2 questions) versus absent (2 minutes; 2 questions). When parents were present, 20% questions were learning versus 25% when parents were absent. Zero percent of rounding events included ≥1 question about prognosis when parents were present versus 9% when absent (P = .02). There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of questions related to complications of management or social factors. CONCLUSIONS: Parent participation in rounds did not impact the quantity of education during rounds but did impact the type of educational questions asked, specifically restricting the discussion of patient prognosis.

Pediatric Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in New York City: An Autopsy Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and severity of nonalcoholic liver disease (NAFLD) in children in a diverse population sample in New York City. STUDY DESIGN: Liver specimens were examined from children 2-19 years old who died of unexpected causes within 48 hours of medical presentation and underwent autopsy in New York City from 2005 to 2010. Records were reviewed for age, sex, weight, height, and race. Two hepatopathologists evaluated each liver specimen to determine pathologic diagnosis. RESULTS: The final study cohort (n = 582) was 50% black, 33% Hispanic, 12% white, 3% Asian, and 2% other; 36% had a body mass index >85%. There were 26 cases of NAFLD (4.5%) of which 10 had nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (1.7%). There were no cases with severe fibrosis or cirrhosis. One percent (3/290) of black children had NAFLD and none had nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. White and Hispanic children had the highest percentages of NAFLD at 8.3% and 7.9%, respectively. In multiple logistic regression models, we observed that body mass index z-score (P < .001) was associated with NAFLD, and that white (P = .003) and Hispanic (P = .005) children had higher odds of having NAFLD compared with black children. CONCLUSIONS: This review of liver tissue demonstrates a lower prevalence and severity of NAFLD in black children compared with the general obese pediatric population. Hispanic children did not have a significantly increased rate of NAFLD compared with white children, most likely related to the large proportion of Caribbean Hispanic children in New York City.

Parental opinions regarding an opt-out consent process for inpatient pediatric prospective observational research in the US.

OBJECTIVE: To explore parental opinions regarding opt-out consent for inpatient pediatric prospective observational research in the US. STUDY DESIGN: A series of handouts describing hypothetical observational research studies with opt-out consent were reviewed by parents of hospitalized children. A verbal survey explored parental opinions about the proposed consent process. RESULTS: A total of 166 parents reviewed the handout and completed the survey. Only 2/166 parents (1.2%) objected to the study described and another 10 (6.0%) cited concern about the privacy of their child's medical information. A total of 157 parents were asked "Is it okay to tell you about this kind of research using this handout?" - 116 (74%) responded positively, 19 (12%) responded negatively, and 21 (13%) made an indeterminate or neutral response. When parents were asked to recommend a specific consent approach for observational research, 86 (52%) chose an opt-in approach, 54 (33%) chose opt-out, and 25 (15%) chose "no consent needed". There were no significant associations between parental preferences and whether the child was admitted to the intensive care unit vs. pediatric ward, and no significant difference found based on type of handout reviewed (generic vs. study-specific). CONCLUSION: Few parents voiced objection to a hypothetical opt-out consent process for inpatient pediatric prospective observational research. When asked to recommend a specific consent approach, though, approximately half chose an opt-in approach. These data suggest that an opt-out consent process for observational inpatient research is likely to be acceptable to parents, but assessment of an opt-out consent process in a real-world setting is needed.