Systemic treatment in advanced phyllodes tumor of the breast: a multi-institutional European retrospective case-series analyses.

BACKGROUND: We aimed at investigating outcome of systemic treatments in advanced breast PT. METHODS: All cases of advanced breast PT treated with systemic treatments from 1999 to 2019, in one of the referral sarcoma centers involved in the study, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: 56 female patients were identified. Median age was 52 (range of 25-76) years. Patients received a median number of 2 systemic treatments (range of 1-4). Best responses according to RECIST were 1 (3.7%) CR, 11 (40.7%) PR, 6 (22.2%) SD, 9 (33.3%) PD with anthracyclines plus ifosfamide (AI); 2 (16.7%) PR, 4 (33.3%) SD, 6 (50.0%) PD with anthracycline alone; 3 (18.8%) PR, 4 (25.0%) SD, 9 (56.3%) PD with high-dose ifosfamide given as a continuous infusion (HD-IFX); 3 (20.0%) SD, 12 (80.0%) PD with a gemcitabine-based regimen (with 2 patients not evaluable); 1 (8.3%) PR, 2 (16.7%) SD, 9 (75.0%) PD with trabectedin (with 1 patient not evaluable); 1 (16.7%) PR, 1 (16.7%) SD, 4 (66.7%) PD with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI). The median PFS were 5.7 (IQR 2.5-9.1) months with AI; 3.2 (IQR 2.2-5.0) months with anthracycline alone; 3.4 (IQR 1.4-6.7) months with HD-IFX; 2.1 (IQR 1.4-5.2) months with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy; 1.8 (IQR 0.7-6.6) months with trabectedin; 3.4 (IQR 3.1-3.8) months with TKI. With a median follow-up of 35.3 (IQR 17.6-66.9) months, OS from the start of first-line systemic treatment was 15.2 (IQR 7.6-39.6) months. CONCLUSION: In this series of advanced PT (to our knowledge, the largest reported so far), AI was associated with a high rate of responses, however, with a median PFS of 5.7 months. Other systemic treatments were poorly active.

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, an ultra-rare cancer: a consensus paper from the community of experts.

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an ultra-rare, translocated, vascular sarcoma. EHE clinical behavior is variable, ranging from that of a low-grade malignancy to that of a high-grade sarcoma and it is marked by a high propensity for systemic involvement. No active systemic agents are currently approved specifically for EHE, which is typically refractory to the antitumor drugs used in sarcomas. The degree of uncertainty in selecting the most appropriate therapy for EHE patients and the lack of guidelines on the clinical management of the disease make the adoption of new treatments inconsistent across the world, resulting in suboptimal outcomes for many EHE patients. To address the shortcoming, a global consensus meeting was organized in December 2020 under the umbrella of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) involving >80 experts from several disciplines from Europe, North America and Asia, together with a patient representative from the EHE Group, a global, disease-specific patient advocacy group, and Sarcoma Patient EuroNet (SPAEN). The meeting was aimed at defining, by consensus, evidence-based best practices for the optimal approach to primary and metastatic EHE. The consensus achieved during that meeting is the subject of the present publication.

Dabrafenib plus trametinib versus dabrafenib monotherapy in patients with metastatic BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma: long-term survival and safety analysis of a phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Previous analysis of COMBI-d (NCT01584648) demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with combination dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib monotherapy in BRAF V600E/K-mutant metastatic melanoma. This study was continued to assess 3-year landmark efficacy and safety after ≥36-month follow-up for all living patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This double-blind, phase 3 study enrolled previously untreated patients with BRAF V600E/K-mutant unresectable stage IIIC or stage IV melanoma. Patients were randomized to receive dabrafenib (150 mg twice daily) plus trametinib (2 mg once daily) or dabrafenib plus placebo. The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints were OS, overall response, duration of response, safety, and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Between 4 May and 30 November 2012, a total of 423 of 947 screened patients were randomly assigned to receive dabrafenib plus trametinib (n = 211) or dabrafenib monotherapy (n = 212). At data cut-off (15 February 2016), outcomes remained superior with the combination: 3-year PFS was 22% with dabrafenib plus trametinib versus 12% with monotherapy, and 3-year OS was 44% versus 32%, respectively. Twenty-five patients receiving monotherapy crossed over to combination therapy, with continued follow-up under the monotherapy arm (per intent-to-treat principle). Of combination-arm patients alive at 3 years, 58% remained on dabrafenib plus trametinib. Three-year OS with the combination reached 62% in the most favourable subgroup (normal lactate dehydrogenase and <3 organ sites with metastasis) versus only 25% in the unfavourable subgroup (elevated lactate dehydrogenase). The dabrafenib plus trametinib safety profile was consistent with previous clinical trial observations, and no new safety signals were detected with long-term use. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that durable (≥3 years) survival is achievable with dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma and support long-term first-line use of the combination in this setting.

153Samarium-EDTMP administration followed by hematopoietic stem cell support for bone metastases in osteosarcoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Bone metastatic patients with osteosarcoma have a very poor prognosis. Targeted radiation therapy has been pursued as a valid alternative. The primary end point of this study was progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two osteosarcoma patients were treated with Samarium-153 ethylenediaminetetramethylene phosphonic acid (153Sm-EDTMP) at various dosages. Administered activities ranged from 150 (3 mCi/kg) to 1140 MBq/kg (30 mCi/kg). Autologous hematopoietic stem cell infusion was carried out on day 14 after the (153)Sm-EDTMP infusion. RESULTS: The median PFS was 61 days (18-436 days) and the median overall survival (OS) was 189 days (31-1175 days). PFS and OS for the entire patient population were 32% [95% confidence interval (CI) 16-50] and 76% (95% CI 52-89) at 4 months, respectively. No statistical differences emerged according to 153Sm-EDTMP administered or 24-h retained activity. One-month pain palliation was only observed in a minority of subjects and in none at 4 months. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our series, the PFS is dramatically short even when higher activity of (153)Sm-EDTMP is administered. This would mean that, even at high level, 153Sm-EDTMP is itself ineffective against relapsed osteosarcoma or the residual activity is too low to be active on these particular subsets of patients.

A greenstick osteoporotic tibial fracture while on chemotherapy in a 12-year-old girl with osteosarcoma of the knee: does a preventive role exist for agents that reduce iatrogenic bone loss and skeletal-related events?

In patients with osteosarcoma several causative factors are implicated in the occurrence of osteoporosis, such as no weight-bearing, pre- and post-surgical immobilization, and neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Nevertheless, osteoporotic fractures are a rare complication in young patients. We report the case of a spontaneous greenstick fracture of the distal tibia occurring during adjuvant chemotherapy in a 12-year-old Caucasian girl. Among the various drugs, the main role of methotrexate was investigated. A review of the literature is also presented along with a discussion about the role of preventive agents able to reduce the occurrence of osteopenia and/or osteoporosis following cancer treatment.

Antiepileptics in brain metastases: safety, efficacy and impact on life expectancy.

The aim of the study was to evaluate efficacy, safety and impact on life expectancy of levetiracetam (LEV), oxcarbazepine (OXC) and topiramate (TPM) monotherapy in patients with seizures related to brain metastases. We conducted a prospective observational study on 70 patients with brain metastases. Thirteen patients were excluded because they were in prophylactic therapy with antiepileptics, nine patients did not return to our Center. A total of 48 patients with epilepsy related to brain metastases were enrolled. Patients were treated with LEV, OXC and TPM in monotherapy and followed until their death. Eighteen patients dropped out. Therefore, we followed 30 patients. Mean duration of follow-up was 6.1 months. Upon visiting the patients prior to their death (i.e. last visit preceding the death of the patients), we observed a significant reduction (P < 0.001) in the mean monthly seizure frequency; with 19 patients (63.3%) obtaining complete seizure control in the whole population. A significant improvement of seizure frequency was also observed considering each antiepileptic treatment group separately. Median survival time was similar among the three groups of patients and was similar to Class I of prognostic factors of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Logistic regression showed that systemic treatments did not influence the antiepileptics' efficacy on seizure control (P = 0.614). In conclusion, regarding the use of newer antiepileptics in patients with seizures related to brain metastases, our data indicate that LEV, OXC and TPM significantly reduce seizure frequency (independently of systemic treatment), produce few side effects and appear not to affect life expectancy.

Hyperthermic isolated perfusion with tumor necrosis factor-alpha and doxorubicin for the treatment of limb-threatening soft tissue sarcoma: the experience of the Italian Society of Integrated Locoregional Treatment in Oncology (SITILO).

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha)-based hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) is routinely carried out at most oncological institutions in the treatment of locally advanced soft tissue limb sarcoma (STS), employing high TNFalpha dosages. After a phase I-II study, the SITILO (Italian Society of Integrated Locoregional Therapies in Oncology) centers began to employ the lower dose of 1 mg of TNFalpha. The aim of this paper is to report on the results obtained in 75 patients with limb-threatening STS treated with a low TNFalpha dose and doxorubicin (Dx). PATIENTS AND METHODS: HILP with TNFalpha (at a dosage of either 1 mg) and Dx was administered to 75 patients with limb-threatening STS: 37 males and 38 females; median age 50 years; tumor in the lower and upper limbs in 58 and 17 patients, respectively; primary and recurrent tumors in 45 and 30 patients, respectively. Most tumors (77%) were high grade. Tumor resection was carried out 6 to 8 weeks after HILP. RESULTS: The grade of limb toxicity was mild to moderate in the vast majority of patients (76%). Grades IV and V were observed, but only when high muscle temperatures were recorded and high TNFalpha dosages were employed. Systemic toxicity was also mild to moderate and there were no postoperative deaths. Complete and partial tumor responses were 34% and 48%, respectively, with an overall response of 82% . Limb sparing surgery was carried out in 85.3% of patients. At a median follow-up of 28 months, 16 recurrences (21.3%) were recorded, with a 5-year locoregional disease-free survival of 63% . The 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 36.7% and 61.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: HILP with 1 mg of TNFalpha is an effective neoadjuvant therapy resulting in a high rate of limb sparing in limb-threatening STS, with acceptable local reactions and negligible systemic toxicity.

Prognostic factors influencing tumor response, locoregional control and survival, in melanoma patients with multiple limb in-transit metastases treated with TNFalpha-based isolated limb perfusion.

BACKGROUND: In isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) and interferon (IFN)-gamma, pioneered by Lienard and Lejenne in 1988, TNFalpha was empirically employed at a dosage (3-4 mg) ten times higher than the systemic maximum tolerable dose (MTD). We previously conducted a phase I/II study in 20 patients with in-transit melanoma metastases, using a combination of melphalan and TNFalpha at dosages ranging from 0.5 to 3.3 mg. The dose of 1 mg of TNFalpha was identified as optimal in terms of both efficacy and toxicity. The aim of the present study was to describe our experience with 113 stage IIIA/IIIAB melanoma patients treated with a TNFalpha-based ILP and identify prognostic factors for response, locoregional control and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients at stage IIIA-IIIAB (presence of in-transit metastases and/or regional node involvement) were considered eligible. The disease was bulky (>or=10 nodules3 cm) in 42.5% of the patients and unresectable in 33% . Forty patients were treated with a TNFalpha dosage of >1 mg and 73 with 1 mg. Patients with tumors in the upper and lower limbs were submitted to ILP via axillary and iliac vessels, respectively. TNFalpha was injected in the arterial line of an extracorporeal circuit at the pre-established dose, followed by melphalan (13 and 10 mg/l of limb volume for the upper and lower limbs, respectively) 30 minutes later. RESULTS: Complete responses (CR) and partial responses (PR) were 63% and 24.5%, respectively, with an objective response (OR) of 87.5%. No change (NC) was observed in only 12.5% of the patients. Upon multivariate analysis, only bulky disease maintained its independent value for tumor response with an odds ratio of 4.07 and a p-value of 0.02. The 5-year locoregional disease-free survival was 42.7%. Upon multivariate analysis, the only prognostic factors were stage, age and bulky disease. The 5-year overall survival was 49%. Multivariate analysis showed that only sex, stage and CR maintained their independent values. CONCLUSION: TNFalpha-based ILP was proven to be an effective treatment for melanoma patients with in-transit metastases. The TNFalpha dosage of 1 mg was as effective as 3-4 mg, with lower toxicity and cost. We propose that TNFalpha and melphalan-based ILP should be employed for bulky tumors or after failure of melphalan-based ILP.

Activity and toxicity of oxaliplatin and bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin in pretreated colorectal cancer patients: a phase II study.

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of a combination of oxaliplatin with bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients pretreated for advanced disease with various schedules including continuous fluorouracil infusion. Thirty consecutive patients with pretreated advanced CRC received oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 by 2-h infusion dl, leucovorin 100 mg/m2 by 1-h infusion followed by fluorouracil 425 mg/m2 i.v. bolus from day 1 to 3 every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles. The best overall response rate in an intent-to-treat analysis was 13% (2 complete responses and 2 partial responses) (95% CI, 1.2-25.5%) and 37% of patients obtained stable disease with a tumor growth control rate of 50% (95% CI, 32.1-67.9%). The median progression-free survival was 4.0 months (95% CI, 1.4-6.5 months) and median overall survival was 12.0 months (95% CI, 9.9-14.1 months). The independent prognostic factors for improved overall survival were a good performance status and a response/stabilization of disease to chemotherapy. Severe neutropenia was quite common (43.3% of patients and 14.4% of cycles), although complicated by fever only in one case (3.3% of patients). There was one toxic death. In conclusion, the study combination showed an interesting rate of tumor growth control in a cohort of patients previously treated for advanced disease with various schedules including continuous fluorouracil infusion.

Single-agent vinorelbine in pretreated breast cancer patients: comparison of two different schedules.

This retrospective study compared toxicity and activity of vinorelbine according to two schedules with different projected dose intensities in heavily pretreated breast cancer patients. Forty patients were assessable for toxicity and activity in each group; group A received vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 week + lenograstim (150 microg/m2 s.c. on day 3); group B received 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. The projected dose intensity was 25 mg/m2/week and 16.6 mg/m2/week, and delivered dose intensity 95.2% and 94.5% in group A and B, respectively. Grade 3-4 afebrile neutropenia was recorded in 25% and 37.5% of patients in A and B, respectively. Overall response rate, 52.5% and 35%; no change, 35% and 40%; progression of disease, 12.5% and 25% in A and B, respectively. Median duration of the response was 10 months for group A and 7 months for B. Median time to progression: 9.0 months and 4.0 months for A and B, respectively. At a median follow-up of 45 months for group A and 19 months for group B, median overall survival was 19 months and 16, respectively. In conclusion the results of the study showed that dose intensity of vinorelbine could have an improvement in terms of time to progression in pretreated advanced breast cancer.

The combination of carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel: a safe and active regimen in advanced non small-cell lung cancer patients. A phase I-II study.

The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel given every three weeks is a tolerated and reasonably active regimen in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study was designed to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a fixed dose of carboplatin with an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 and escalating doses of weekly paclitaxel with an initial dose of 50 mg/m2 with 10 mg/m2 increments at each level in untreated NSCLC patients (phase I study). The study continued with a phase II study. Thirty patients entered the phase I study. The MTD was: carboplatin AUC = 6 on days 1 and 28 plus paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 (1 hour) on days 1, 8,15, 28. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was severe neutropenia and cardiological toxicity. Subsequently, 42 patients entered the phase II study with the same treatment schedule. The 2-drug combination was globally well tolerated. The overall response rate (RR) was 42% [CI 95%: 26.3-57.7], stable disease (SD) 29% and progression (PD) 29%. The median duration of response was 8.0 mos (range: 1.0-19.0). The median time to progression was 8.0 mos (range: 7.0-19.0) and the median survival was 14.0 months (range: 9.0-19.0). The association of carboplatin AUC = 6 and weekly paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 proved to be manageable, active and extremely safe even in elderly patients (one third of all patients in our cohort). The survival results were interesting: the median survival time was 14 months (9-19 months) and the 1- and 2-year survival was 59% and 16%, respectively.