Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis: Brazilian Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Unplanned peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an important option for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients requiring kidney replacement therapy urgently as it offers the convenience of home-based therapy. The objective of this study was to assess the Brazilian urgent-start PD program in three different dialysis centers where there is shortage of hemodialysis (HD) beds. METHODS: This prospective, multicentric cohort study included incident patients with stage 5 CKD and no permanent vascular access established who started urgent PD between July 2014 and July 2020 in three different hospitals. Urgent-start PD was defined as initiation of treatment up to 72 h after catheter placement. Patients were followed up from catheter insertion and assessed according to mechanical and infectious complications related to PD, patients, and technique survival. RESULTS: Over 6 years, 370 patients were included in all three study centers. Mean patient age was 57.8 ± 16.32 years. Diabetic kidney disease was the main underlying condition (35.1%) and uremia was the main cause for dialysis indication (81.1%). Concerning complications related to PD, 24.3% had mechanical complications, 27.3% had peritonitis, 28.01% had technique failure, and 17.8% died. On logistic regression, hospitalization (p = 0.003) and exit site infection (p = 0.002) were identified as predictors of peritonitis, while mechanical complications (p = 0.004) and peritonitis (p < 0.001) were identified as predictors of technique failure and switching to HD. Age (p < 0.001), hospitalization (p = 0.012), and bacteremia (p = 0.021) were observed to predict death. The number of patients on PD increased at least 140% in all three participating centers. CONCLUSION: PD is a feasible option for patients starting dialysis in an unplanned manner and may be a useful tool for reducing shortage of HD beds.

Increase in peritoneal dialysis-related hospitalization rates after telemedicine implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To minimize our peritoneal dialysis (PD) population exposure to coronavirus disease (COVID-19), in April 2020 we developed and implemented a telemedicine program. In this investigation, we aimed to compare the hospitalization rates and metabolic disorders in patients undergoing PD 6 months before and after the COVID-19 pandemic and telemedicine implementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective analysis included all active prevalent patients undergoing PD from April 2020. Dialysis records were reviewed to obtain clinical, demographic, laboratory, appointment, and hospitalization data. We compared hospitalization rates (total, non-PD-related, and PD-related), hospitalization-associated factors, and metabolic disorders (hemoglobin, serum potassium, and serum phosphate) 6 months before and after the pandemic. RESULTS: Our sample comprised 103 participants. During the pre-pandemic and post-pandemic periods, there were 13 and 27 hospital admissions, respectively. The total hospitalization incident rate ratio (IRR) was 2.48 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-4.75). PD-related hospitalizations increased from 3 to 15 episodes (IRR=7.25 [95% CI, 2.11-24.78]). In the pre-pandemic period, the educational level was lower in participants hospitalised due to PD-related issues than in participants not hospitalised. In the post-pandemic period, only sex distribution differed between patients not hospitalised and those hospitalised due to non-PD-related issues. Only serum potassium levels changed significantly in the post-pandemic period (4.79±0.48 vs. 4.93±0.54mg/dL; P<0.01). CONCLUSION: This study showed a significant increase in hospitalization rates after the COVID-19 pandemic period and telemedicine implementation, mainly due to PD-related infectious causes. Strategies to improve distance monitoring assistance are needed for the PD population.

Increase in peritoneal dialysis-related hospitalization rates after telemedicine implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction and objectives: To minimize our peritoneal dialysis (PD) population exposure to coronavirus disease (COVID-19), in April 2020 we developed and implemented a telemedicine program. In this investigation, we aimed to compare the hospitalization rates and metabolic disorders in patients undergoing PD 6 months before and after the COVID-19 pandemic and telemedicine implementation. Materials and methods: This single-center retrospective analysis included all active prevalent patients undergoing PD from April 2020. Dialysis records were reviewed to obtain clinical, demographic, laboratory, appointment, and hospitalization data. We compared hospitalization rates (total, non-PD-related, and PD-related), hospitalization-associated factors, and metabolic disorders (hemoglobin, serum potassium, and serum phosphate) 6 months before and after the pandemic. Results: Our sample comprised 103 participants. During the pre-pandemic and post-pandemic periods, there were 13 and 27 hospital admissions, respectively. The total hospitalization incident rate ratio (IRR) was 2.48 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-4.75). PD-related hospitalizations increased from 3 to 15 episodes (IRR = 7.25 [95% CI, 2.11-24.78]). In the pre-pandemic period, the educational level was lower in participants hospitalised due to PD-related issues than in participants not hospitalised. In the post-pandemic period, only sex distribution differed between patients not hospitalised and those hospitalised due to non-PD-related issues. Only serum potassium levels changed significantly in the post-pandemic period (4.79 ± 0.48 vs. 4.93 ± 0.54 mg/dL; P < 0.01). Conclusion: This study showed a significant increase in hospitalization rates after the COVID-19 pandemic period and telemedicine implementation, mainly due to PD-related infectious causes. Strategies to improve distance monitoring assistance are needed for the PD population.

Introducción y objetivos: Para minimizar la exposición de nuestra población de diálisis peritoneal (DP) a la enfermedad por coronavirus (COVID-19), en abril del 2020 desarrollamos e implementamos un programa de telemedicina. En esta investigación, nuestro objetivo fue comparar las tasas de hospitalización y los trastornos metabólicos en pacientes sometidos a DP 6 meses antes y después de la pandemia de COVID-19 y la implementación de la telemedicina. Materiales y métodos: Este análisis retrospectivo de un solo centro incluyó a todos los pacientes prevalentes activos sometidos a DP desde abril del 2020. Se revisaron los registros de diálisis para obtener datos clínicos, demográficos, de laboratorio, de citas y de hospitalización. Comparamos las tasas de hospitalización (total, no relacionada con la DP y relacionada con la DP), los factores asociados a la hospitalización y los trastornos metabólicos (hemoglobina, potasio sérico y fosfato sérico) 6 meses antes y después de la pandemia. Resultados: Nuestra muestra fue compuesta por 103 participantes. Durante los períodos prepandémico y pospandémico, hubo 13 y 27 ingresos hospitalarios, respectivamente. La razón de la tasa de incidentes de hospitalización (TIR) total fue de 2,48 (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%, 1,29-4,75). Las hospitalizaciones relacionadas con la DP aumentaron de 3 a 15 episodios (TIR = 7,25 [IC del 95%, 2,11-24,78]). En el período prepandémico, el nivel educativo fue más bajo en los participantes hospitalizados debido a problemas relacionados con la DP que en los participantes no hospitalizados. En el período posterior a la pandemia, solo la distribución por sexo difirió entre los pacientes no hospitalizados y los hospitalizados debido a problemas no relacionados con la DP. Solo los niveles de potasio sérico cambiaron significativamente en el período pospandémico (4.79 ± 0.48 frente a 4.93 ± 0.54 mg/dL; P < 0.01). Conclusión: Este estudio mostró un aumento significativo en las tasas de hospitalización después del período pandémico de COVID-19 y la implementación de la telemedicina, principalmente debido a causas infecciosas relacionadas con la DP. Se necesitan estrategias para mejorar la asistencia de monitoreo a distancia para la población con DP.

Urgent vs. planned peritoneal dialysis initiation: complications and outcomes in the first year of therapy / Diálise peritoneal de início urgente versus planejado: complicações e desfechos no primeiro ano de terapia

Abstract Introduction: Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (US-PD) has been proposed as a safe modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with an indication for emergency dialysis initiation. We aimed to compare the characteristics, 30-day complications, and clinical outcomes of US-PD and planned peritoneal dialysis (Plan-PD) patients over the first year of therapy. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study that included incident adult patients followed for up to one year. US-PD was considered when incident patients started therapy within 7 days after Tenckhoff catheter implantation. Plan-PD group consisted of patients who started therapy after the breaking period (15 days). Mechanical and infectious complications were compared 30 days from PD initiation. Hospitalization and technique failure during the first 12 months on PD were assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and the determinants were calculated by Cox regression models. Results: All patients starting PD between October/2016 and November/2019 who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were analyzed. We evaluated 137 patients (70 in the US-PD x 67 Plan-PD). The main complications in the first 30 days were catheter tip migration (7.5% Plan-PD x 4.3% US-PD - p= 0.49) and leakage (4.5% Plan-PD x 5.7% US-PD - p=0.74). Most catheters were placed using the Seldinger technique. The main cause of dropout was death in US-PD patients (15.7%) and transfer to HD in Plan-PD patients (13.4%). The occurrence of complications in the first 30 days was the only risk factor for dropout (OR = 2.9; 95% CI 1.1-7.5, p = 0.03). Hospitalization rates and technique survival were similar in both groups. Conclusion: The lack of significant differences in patients' outcomes between groups reinforces that PD is a safe and applicable dialysis method in patients who need immediate dialysis.

Resumo Introdução: A diálise peritoneal de início urgente (US-PD) foi proposta como modalidade segura de terapia renal substitutiva (TRS) para pacientes com doença renal em estágio 5 (DRC-5) com indicação de início de diálise de emergência. Buscamos comparar características, complicações em 30 dias e desfechos clínicos de pacientes em US-PD e diálise peritoneal planejada (DP-plan) no primeiro ano de terapia. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo de centro único, que incluiu pacientes adultos incidentes em DP acompanhados por até um ano. Considerou-se US-PD quando os pacientes iniciaram terapia até 7 dias após implante do cateter Tenckhoff. O grupo DP-plan consistiu de pacientes iniciando terapia após período break-in (15 dias). Compararam-se complicações mecânicas e infecciosas 30 dias após o início da DP. Hospitalização e falha da técnica durante os primeiros 12 meses em terapia foram avaliados por curvas Kaplan-Meier e os seus determinantes foram analisados por modelos de regressão de Cox. Resultados: Analisaram-se todos os pacientes iniciando DP entre Outubro/2016-Novembro/2019 que preencheram os critérios de inclusão. Avaliamos 137 pacientes (70 US-PD x 67 DP-plan). As principais complicações nos primeiros 30 dias foram migração da ponta do cateter (7,5% DP-plan x 4,3% US-PD - p= 0,49) e extravasamento (4,5% DP-plan x 5,7% US-PD - p=0,74). A maioria dos cateteres foi implantada pela técnica de Seldinger. A principal causa de saída da terapia foi óbito em pacientes em US-PD (15,7%) e transferência para HD em pacientes em DP-plan (13,4%). A ocorrência de complicações nos primeiros 30 dias foi o único fator de risco para saída da terapia (OR = 2,9; IC 95% 1,1-7,5, p = 0,03). Taxas de hospitalização e sobrevida da técnica foram similares em ambos os grupos. Conclusão: A ausência de diferenças significativas nos desfechos dos pacientes entre os grupos reforça que DP é um método de diálise seguro e aplicável em pacientes que necessitam diálise imediata.

Urgent vs. planned peritoneal dialysis initiation: complications and outcomes in the first year of therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (US-PD) has been proposed as a safe modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with an indication for emergency dialysis initiation. We aimed to compare the characteristics, 30-day complications, and clinical outcomes of US-PD and planned peritoneal dialysis (Plan-PD) patients over the first year of therapy. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study that included incident adult patients followed for up to one year. US-PD was considered when incident patients started therapy within 7 days after Tenckhoff catheter implantation. Plan-PD group consisted of patients who started therapy after the breaking period (15 days). Mechanical and infectious complications were compared 30 days from PD initiation. Hospitalization and technique failure during the first 12 months on PD were assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and the determinants were calculated by Cox regression models. RESULTS: All patients starting PD between October/2016 and November/2019 who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were analyzed. We evaluated 137 patients (70 in the US-PD x 67 Plan-PD). The main complications in the first 30 days were catheter tip migration (7.5% Plan-PD x 4.3% US-PD - p= 0.49) and leakage (4.5% Plan-PD x 5.7% US-PD - p=0.74). Most catheters were placed using the Seldinger technique. The main cause of dropout was death in US-PD patients (15.7%) and transfer to HD in Plan-PD patients (13.4%). The occurrence of complications in the first 30 days was the only risk factor for dropout (OR = 2.9; 95% CI 1.1-7.5, p = 0.03). Hospitalization rates and technique survival were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: The lack of significant differences in patients' outcomes between groups reinforces that PD is a safe and applicable dialysis method in patients who need immediate dialysis.

Assessment of patients referred to urgent start peritoneal dialysis: when does the nurse contraindicate? / Avaliação de pacientes indicados para diálise peritoneal urgent start: quando o enfermeiro contraindica?

Abstract Introduction: Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (US-PD) has been used worldwide with very positive results. The prior assessment of candidates for this therapy by a nurse can favor the success of the therapy. Objectives: To identify the profile of patients who are candidates for US-PD, the causes of contraindication of the method by the nurse and their permanence in the method after 30 days, as well as the growth of the service after implementing the program. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the forms used to assess candidates for US-PD applied by nurses between May 2017 and August 2019 in a clinic in Santa Catarina. We analyzed information on demographic profile, reasons for contraindication and permanence in the method after 30 days, as well as service growth after the program was implemented. Results: Of the 215 patients indicated for US-PD, 51% were male, 55% were under 60 years old, 51% had diabetes mellitus and 89% were hypertensive. Of these, 173 (80%) patients had the nurse's approval for PD. The only cause contraindicated was the inability to self-care associated with the lack of family support. In the first 30 days after the assessment, 89% of the patients who started PD remained on it. During the study period, the PD service grew by 91%. Conclusion: During the study period, a fifth of patients referred to US-PD received contraindication by nursing due to self-care inability associated with the lack of family support. After 30 days, 89% of the patients remained on it.

Resumo Introdução: A diálise peritoneal (DP) de início urgente ou urgent start (DP-US) vem sendo utilizada mundialmente e apresenta resultados bastante positivos. A avaliação prévia dos candidatos a essa terapia por um enfermeiro pode favorecer o sucesso do tratamento. Objetivos: Identificar o perfil dos pacientes candidatos à DP-US, as causas de contraindicação do método pelo enfermeiro e sua permanência após 30 dias, bem como o crescimento do serviço com a implementação do programa. Métodos: Foram analisados retrospectivamente formulários de avaliação dos candidatos à DP-US aplicados pelos enfermeiros entre maio de 2017 a agosto de 2019 em uma clínica de diálise localizada na região sul brasileira. Foram analisadas informações referentes a perfil demográfico, motivos para contraindicação e permanência no método após 30 dias, bem como crescimento do serviço após implementação do programa. Resultados: Dos 215 pacientes indicados para DP-US, 51% eram do sexo masculino, 55% tinham menos de 60 anos, 51% apresentavam diabetes mellitus, 89% eram hipertensos. Desses, 173 (80%) pacientes obtiveram parecer positivo do enfermeiro para DP. A única causa para contraindicação foi a incapacidade para autocuidado associado à falta de apoio familiar. Nos primeiros 30 dias após a avaliação, 89% dos pacientes que iniciaram a DP-US permaneceram na técnica. No período do estudo, o serviço de DP teve um crescimento de 91%. Conclusão: Um quinto dos pacientes indicados à DP-US recebeu contraindicação pela enfermagem devido à incapacidade de autocuidado associado à falta de apoio familiar. Após 30 dias, 89% dos pacientes haviam permanecido na técnica.

Assessment of patients referred to urgent start peritoneal dialysis: when does the nurse contraindicate?

INTRODUCTION: Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (US-PD) has been used worldwide with very positive results. The prior assessment of candidates for this therapy by a nurse can favor the success of the therapy. OBJECTIVES: To identify the profile of patients who are candidates for US-PD, the causes of contraindication of the method by the nurse and their permanence in the method after 30 days, as well as the growth of the service after implementing the program. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the forms used to assess candidates for US-PD applied by nurses between May 2017 and August 2019 in a clinic in Santa Catarina. We analyzed information on demographic profile, reasons for contraindication and permanence in the method after 30 days, as well as service growth after the program was implemented. RESULTS: Of the 215 patients indicated for US-PD, 51% were male, 55% were under 60 years old, 51% had diabetes mellitus and 89% were hypertensive. Of these, 173 (80%) patients had the nurse's approval for PD. The only cause contraindicated was the inability to self-care associated with the lack of family support. In the first 30 days after the assessment, 89% of the patients who started PD remained on it. During the study period, the PD service grew by 91%. CONCLUSION: During the study period, a fifth of patients referred to US-PD received contraindication by nursing due to self-care inability associated with the lack of family support. After 30 days, 89% of the patients remained on it.