Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pract Lab Med ; 39: e00357, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38404528

RESUMO

Objective: To compare the laboratory tests conducted in real-life settings for patients with anemia with the expected prescriptions derived from an optimal checkup. Methods: A panel of experts formulated an "optimal laboratory test assessment" specific to each anemia profile. A retrospective analysis was done of the laboratory tests conducted according to the type of anemia (microcytic, normocytic or macrocytic). Using an algorithmic system, the laboratory tests performed in real-life practice were compared with the recommendations suggested in the "optimal laboratory test assessment" and with seemingly "unnecessary" laboratory tests. Results: In the analysis of the "optimal laboratory test assessment", of the 1179 patients with microcytic anemia, 269 (22.8%) had had one of the three tests recommended by the expert system, and only 33 (2.8%) had all three tests. For normocytic anemia, 1054 of 2313 patients (45.6%) had one of the eleven recommended tests, and none had all eleven. Of the 384 patients with macrocytic anemia, 196 (51%) had one of the four recommended tests, and none had all four. In the analysis of "unnecessary laboratory tests", one lab test was unnecessarily done in 727/3876 patients (18.8%), i.e. 339 of 1179 (28.8%) microcytic, 171 of 2313 (7.4%) normocytic, and 217 of 384 (56.5 %) macrocytic anemias. Conclusion: Laboratory investigations of anemia remain imperfect as more than half of the cases did not receive the expected tests. Analyzing other diagnostic domains, the authors are currently developing an artificial intelligence system to assist physicians in enhancing the efficiency of their laboratory test prescriptions.

2.
Implant Dent ; 14(3): 281-8, 2005 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16160575

RESUMO

The purpose of this study is to evaluate urinary biomarkers of bone formation and resorption as predictive factors for oral implant failure, and to contribute to the knowledge of factors related to oral implant failure. A total of 93 patients between 18 and 85 years old, with an indication of oral implant, were eligible in this 2-year prospective, open, and nonrandomized study. Patients who had bone graft before implantation or presented with prosthetic difficulties (implant-to-crown ratio < 1, and/or unfavorable intermaxillary space) were excluded. All patients received either Frialit-2 (Friadent, Mannheim, Germany), cylinder, or screwed implants or IMZ Twin Plus (Friadent), cylinder implants, with FRIOS (Friadent) titanium coating. Serum osteocalcin, and urinary pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline were measured, together with bone density at implant location. The primary endpoint (implant failure) was the implant removal (radiographic evidence of peri-implant bone loss and/or pockets). Factors related to implant failure were analyzed using multilevel logistic regression models to consider within-patient effects. Of the 93 patients included, 61% were female, and 16% were current smokers. A total of 266 oral implants were placed and analyzed, with a mean number of 3.1 implants by patient. Eleven and 15% of bone locations scored at D1 and D4, respectively, for the Misch bone density scoring. The majority of implants (72%) were placed more than 3 months after tooth extraction, using a Frialit-2 system in 73% of cases. The mean of osteocalcin was 17.3 (+/-9.4) ng/L; those of pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline were 33.2 (+/-15.8) and 10.2 (+/-11.9) mmol per creatinine mmol, respectively. At one-year, 95.5% (95% confidence interval 92.5-97.5) of implants have not been removed. One year later, no further implant failed. In both univariate and multivariate analysis, osteocalcin, pyridinoline, and deoxypyridinoline were not significant predictive factors of oral implant failure. In multilevel logistic regression analysis, only tobacco consumption and single-tooth replacement or removable prosthesis were independent and significant predictive factors of oral implant failure. Serum osteocalcin, and urinary pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline were not predictive of oral implant failure in this study. These results suggest that oral implants are more likely to fail for posterior single-tooth replacements and removable prostheses rather than for complete edentulous fixed bridgeworks or overdentures. Tobacco smoking has been identified as a major risk factor of oral implant failure.


Assuntos
Reabsorção Óssea/urina , Implantes Dentários , Falha de Restauração Dentária , Osteogênese/fisiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Perda do Osso Alveolar/etiologia , Aminoácidos/urina , Biomarcadores/urina , Densidade Óssea/fisiologia , Creatinina/urina , Planejamento de Prótese Dentária , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteocalcina/urina , Bolsa Periodontal/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fumar
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA