Sustained virological response in patients with HCV treated with daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin: a large, field-practice study.

BACKGROUND: The once-daily oral combination of daclatasvir (DCV) and sofosbuvir (SOF), with or without ribavirin (RBV), is effective and well tolerated in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV). However, further field-practice studies are necessary to investigate the effectiveness and safety of the DCV+SOF combination in diverse subpopulations of patients with HCV, including those who are more challenging to treat such as patients with a genotype 3 (G3) infection. The aim of this retrospective, multicenter, field-practice study was to investigate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of the oral combination of DCV and SOF, with or without RBV (DCV+SOF±RBV), in a large unselected cohort of patients with chronic HCV infection (CHC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients received DCV+SOF±RBV for 12 or 24 weeks. The efficacy endpoint was sustained virological response at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). Safety factors were also considered. RESULTS: A total of 620 patients were included in this study; the predominant genotype was G3 (55.3%). Of the total sample, 248 (40%) patients were treated with DCV+SOF+RBV and 372 (60%) did not receive RBV. The majority of patients assessed at week 12 (98%, 596/608) achieved SVR12. Among G3 patients, 98.8% (335/339) achieved SVR12. The most common adverse event was elevated bilirubin (30.6%), recorded in 4.9% of cases as a grade 3-4 adverse event. CONCLUSION: This study shows the high pan-genotypic effectiveness and safety of the DCV+SOF±RBV combination in a large, unselected sample of CHC patients with G1-4, including a wide proportion of G3 CHC patients.

Boceprevir or telaprevir in hepatitis C virus chronic infection: The Italian real life experience.

AIM: To check the safety and efficacy of boceprevir/telaprevir with peginterferon/ribavirin for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 in the real-world settings. METHODS: This study was a non-randomized, observational, prospective, multicenter. This study involved 47 centers in Italy. A database was prepared for the homogenous collection of the data, was used by all of the centers for data collection, and was updated continuously. All of the patients enrolled in this study were older than 18 years of age and were diagnosed with chronic infection due to HCV genotype 1. The HCV RNA testing was performed using COBAS-TaqMan2.0 (Roche, LLQ 25 IU/mL). RESULTS: All consecutively treated patients were included. Forty-seven centers enrolled 834 patients as follows: Male 64%; median age 57 (range 18-78), of whom 18.3% were over 65; mean body mass index 25.6 (range 16-39); genotype 1b (79.4%); diagnosis of cirrhosis (38.2%); and fibrosis F3/4 (71.2%). The following drugs were used: Telaprevir (66.2%) and PEG-IFN-alpha2a (67.6%). Patients were naïve (24.4%), relapsers (30.5%), partial responders (14.8%) and null responders (30.3%). Overall, adverse events (AEs) occurred in 617 patients (73.9%) during the treatment. Anemia was the most frequent AE (52.9% of cases), especially in cirrhotic. The therapy was stopped for 14.6% of the patients because of adverse events or virological failure (15%). Sustained virological response was achieved in 62.7% of the cases, but was 43.8% in cirrhotic patients over 65 years of age. CONCLUSION: In everyday practice, triple therapy is safe but has moderate efficacy, especially for patients over 65 years of age, with advanced fibrosis, non-responders to peginterferon + ribavirin.

The use of terlipressin in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites and normal renal function: a multicentric study.

UNLABELLED: Ascites is a common complication of liver cirrhosis, occurring in more than 50-60% of the patients within 10 years of the diagnosis. In 5-10% of patients, ascites cannot be mobilized, or its early recurrence cannot be prevented by medical treatment. This condition is known as "refractory ascites". The use of terlipressin in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites and normal renal function has not been evaluated. This prospective study was aimed at evaluating whether terlipressin in addition to standard therapy (diuretics plus albumin) might improve the outcome of refractory ascites in cirrhotic patients without HRS. PATIENTS: 26 cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites were prospectively enrolled in this study. All the patients had tense (grade 3) ascites, and 10/26 showed also massive peripheral edema. Patients received maximum diuretic treatment plus albumin and terlipressin. RESULTS: Complete response was seen in 16/26 patients. The higher response to therapy was seen during the 2nd week of treatment. 6 patients showed a decrease of at least two points in the ascites score. No differences in clinical response to treatment were seen according to the etiology of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our study shows a synergistic effect of terlipressin vs treatment with albumin plus diuretics in patients with refractory ascites. One could speculate that albumin might enhance the vasoconstrictive response to terlipressin, thus contributing to counterbalance the negative effects of systemic vasodilation, which characterizes the hyperdynamic circulation of cirrhotic patients.