Simple trapeziectomy for thumb basal joint arthrosis. Forty-four thumbs re-reviewed after 7.5 years.

Background: Due to favorable results in the literature we changed our standard procedure in 2010 from trapeziectomy with LRTI to simple trapeziectomy for thumb basal joint arthrosis. A review of 49 operated hands after two years showed good results, similar to those we had obtained after LRTI. Objective: We have now re-reviewed these patients to see if the good results persist over time. Methods: All patients from the earlier study were contacted and 40 patients with 44 operated thumbs were re-reviewed after a mean of 7.5 years. Results: The mean pain score (0-100) was 14 (SD:22) compared to 18 (25) at the earlier review. There was no significant change in ability to perform ADL activities between reviews. Mean VAS (0-100) for clumsiness fell significantly between early and late review (67 (SD:18) versus 45(27); p â€‹< â€‹0.019), although clumsiness was reported by an increased number of patients. VAS for general satisfaction had improved from 23 (SD:28) to 13 (22) between reviews (p â€‹< â€‹0.01). The mean QuickDASH and PRWHE scores were practically unchanged. There was significantly improved thumb abduction and ulnar/radial deviation at the wrist. There was a significant reduction in power grip and key pinch in both the operated and the contralateral un-operated hands compared to the earlier review. Radiographs showed a slightly reduced mean distance between the first metacarpal and the scaphoid. Conclusion: We conclude that the good results after simple trapeziectomy persist.

Coccygectomy in the Treatment of Chronic Coccydynia.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article was to evaluate the results of patients operated for chronic coccydynia, and determine any factors that could affect outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with coccydynia who do not respond to conservative treatment will often profit from coccygectomy. Studies of results and complications vary considerably and often report on a limited number of patients. Methods. A total of 184 patients were operated with coccygectomy in our department and followed-up with questionnaires after a minimum of 1 year post-operatively. Treatment results were compared to their preoperative state, and any complications or reoperations were recorded and analyzed. Results. A total of 171 patients (93%) responded to final follow-up. The overall success rate was 71%, defined by patients being either completely well or much better at final follow-up. Furthermore, 89% off all patients would have consented to the operation if they had known the outcome in advance. The rate of post-operative infections was reduced from 10% to 2% by increasing the duration of prophylactic postoperative antibiotics from 24 to 48 hours (P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Coccygectomy, for patients where conservative measures have failed, seems to give acceptable levels of success and high levels of patient satisfaction. The main complication after this procedure is infection, and the risk can be somewhat reduced by using antibiotic prophylaxis for 48 hours after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Corticosteroid injection for coccydynia: a review of 241 patients.

AIMS: We aimed to establish the short- and long-term efficacy of corticosteroid injection for coccydynia, and to determine if betamethasone or triamcinolone has the best effect. METHODS: During 2009 to 2016, we treated 277 patients with chronic coccydynia with either one 6 mg betamethasone or one 20 mg triamcinolone cortisone injection. A susequent injection was given to 62 (26%) of the patients. All were reviewed three to four months after injection, and 241 replied to a questionnaire a mean of 36 months (12 to 88) after the last injection. No pain at the early review was considered early success. When the patient had not been subsequently operated on, and indicated on the questionnaire that they were either well or much better, it was considered a long-term success. RESULTS: At the three- to four-month review, 22 (9%) reported that they had no pain. The long-term success of one injection was 15% and rose to 29% after a second injection. Logistic regression tests showed that both early success (odds ratio (OR) 5.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1 to 14.4; p = 0.001) and late success (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.7 to 8.3; p = 0.001) was greater with triamcinolone than with betamethasone. Late success was greater for patients with symptoms for less than 12 months (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.4 to 6.7; p = 0.006). We saw no complications of the injections. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the effect of corticosteroid injection for coccygodynia is moderate, possibly because we used modest doses of the drugs. Even so, they seem worthwhile as they are easily and quickly performed, and complications are rare. If the choice is between injections of betamethasone or triamcinolone, the latter should be selected.Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-11:709-714.

The effect of injection therapy and operation of coccydynia on the schooling and physical activity of adolescent patients.

Pain while sitting is the most common complaint among patients with Coccydynia. In young patients this may seriously affect their schooling which usually involves long periods of sitting. We studied if this improved after either injection therapy or surgery. During a seven-year period 32 adolescents with a mean age of 15 (range: 11-17) years were treated in our department because of coccydynia. They were followed up with mailed questionnaires at a minimum of 12 months after treatment and 28 (88%) responded. Three were no longer attending school and were excluded. Of the remainder, 12 received only injection therapy while 13 were operated upon. Mean follow-up time was 36 (14-66) months. Eight reported absence from school during the month before treatment, but only one during the week before review (pÃ0.01). There was significant improvement in sitting during class and physical exercise at school and when engaging in general sports (pÃ0.01). We can not exclude that improvements would have occurred spontaneously, but this seems unlikely as symptoms had persisted for more than two years before treatment. We conclude that in juveniles, an additional benefit of treating coccydynia with corticosteroid injection or operative resection is that their ability to attend school and take part in sports improves significantly.

Resection of the coccyx as an outpatient procedure.

We wished to determine if coccygectomy as an outpatient procedure is a safe alternative to inpatient treatment. 68 patients were treated at our institution with coccygectomy as an outpatient procedure during a seven-year period. Out of these 61 (90%) responded to final follow-up questionnaires after a minimum of one year. We recorded satisfaction with the outpatient modality, and compared postoperative complications and long-term satisfaction with patients who had been operated as inpatients during the same period. Out of the 61 patients who responded to final follow up, 39 (64%) were satisfied with having the operation as an outpatient procedure. The patients who would have preferred overnight hospitalization generally felt that traveling home the same day was painful. There was significantly less pain on the journey home if the procedure had been performed under spinal anaesthesia. In terms of complications, there were 10% reoperations due to deep infection in the outpatient group, and 12% superficial wound infections treated with oral antibiotics. The corresponding numbers for the in-patient group were 8% and 14%. The long-term success rate was similar for both groups. 87% of outpatients and 89% of inpatients reported that they would have consented to the operation if they had known the result in advance. Coccygectomy as an outpatient procedure gives similar results to inpatient treatment and can be regarded as an acceptable alternative. Spinal anaesthesia reduces postoperative pain on the journey home.

The treatment of coccydynia in adolescents: A case-control study.

AIMS: To determine if the results of treatment of adolescents with coccydynia are similar to those found in adults. Adult patients with coccydynia may benefit from injection therapy or operative treatment. There is little data evaluating treatment results in adolescents. We have treated adolescent patients similarly to adults and compared the outcomes. METHODS: Overall, 32 adolescents with coccydynia were treated at our institution during a seven-year period; 28 responded to final follow-up questionnaires after a minimum of one year, 14 had been treated with only injection therapy, and 14 had been operated with coccygectomy. We collected data with regards to pain while sitting, leaning forward, rising from a sitting position, during defecation, while walking or jogging, and while travelling in trains, planes, or automobiles. Pain at follow-up was registered on a numeric pain scale. Each adolescent was then matched to adult patients, and results compared in a case control fashion. The treatment was considered successful if respondents were either completely well or much better at final follow-up after one to seven years. RESULTS: Out of the 28 treated adolescents, 14 were regarded as successfully treated. Seven were somewhat better, and the remaining seven were unchanged. In the adult control group the corresponding number was 15 successfully treated, eight patients were somewhat better, and five were unchanged. Six of the 14 successfully treated adolescents had been operated. There were no significant differences between the groups in the various registered domains, or on numeric pain scale. CONCLUSION: Treatment results in adolescent patients seem similar to those in adults. The long-term success rate of injection therapy is low. In case of injection treatment failure, operation may be considered, also in adolescents.

Normal Preoperative Images Do Not Indicate a Poor Outcome of Surgery for Coccydynia.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term outcomes after surgery for refractory coccygodynia in patients with normal imaging studies compared with patients where imaging shows an anomaly. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with coccydynia who do not respond to conservative treatment will often profit from coccygectomy. Most surgeons employ plain radiographs or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in their preoperative work-up. These will often show anomalies, but in some cases they do not. We investigated whether these patients do less well than those with abnormal images. METHODS: We operated on 184 patients with coccydynia during a 7-year period and 171 (93%) responded to follow-up questionnaires after 37 (range: 12-85) months. Images of 33 patients were normal and 138 showed some coccygeal pathology. Surgery was considered to have been unsuccessful when respondents stated at review that they were somewhat better, unchanged, or worse. RESULTS: There were no clinically or statistically significant differences in outcome between the groups. Surgery was unsuccessful in 24% of patients with normal images and in 32% among those with abnormal images. The median pain scores (0-10) during the week before review were two (interquartile range [IQR]: 0-3) and one (IQR: 1-5) in the two groups respectively. Similar proportions in the two groups stated that they would not have consented to surgery if they had known the outcome in advance. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe coccydynia who have not responded to conservative treatment should not be denied surgery only because their radiographs or MRI studies look normal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

The Reliability of Remembered Pretreatment Visual Analog Scale Scores among Hand-Surgery Patients.

Background In clinical audits in which preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores were not recorded, it would be useful if such scores could be re-created at the time of review. Patients and Methods We recorded VAS score for pain during the past week before surgery for 245 consecutive hand-surgery patients scheduled for planned surgery during a 6-month period. A total of 30 patients who refused to participate or were unable to respond were excluded. The remaining 215 patients were contacted after 21 months and asked to furnish a new VAS score of the pain they remembered to have had during the last week before surgery. Responses were analyzed with a Bland-Altman plot. Results One hundred and thirty-one (61%) of the patients responded. The mean remembered preoperative score was higher than the mean real preoperative score in all diagnosis groups. The mean difference was 10 mm (standard deviation: 22 mm; standard error of the mean: 2 mm). The lower and upper limits of 95% agreement for individual scores were -33 and 53 mm, whereas the lower and upper limits of the 95% confidence interval of the mean were 6 and 14 mm. Conclusion It may be possible to predict the mean real preoperative VAS score in groups of patients with accuracy using the remembered preoperative score. In individual patients, remembered preoperative VAS scores are far too inaccurate to be of value. However, real preoperative scores should be used whenever possible.

The value of remembered pre-operative quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) scores.

It would be useful if it were possible for the patients to recreate their pre-operative QuickDASH scores in audits where this score had not been recorded before surgery. We assessed the accuracy of remembered pre-operative QuickDASH scores among 229 consecutive patients and the value of a previously developed algorithm for correcting these scores. Real pre-operative scores and remembered pre-operative scores were compared after a mean of 21 months. Furthermore, the scores of a subgroup of 79 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, subacromial impingement, thumb basal joint arthrosis or Dupuytren's contracture were corrected using an algorithm. The mean difference between remembered and real pre-operative scores for all patients showed heteroscedacity in the Bland-Altman plot. The scores of the 79 sub-analysis patients were homoscedastic. The mean difference between remembered and real pre-operative scores was 9 (SD 16, SEM 1.85). Correcting the scores of the sub-group patients using our algorithm decreased the variation only moderately. The remembered pre-operative score is too inaccurate to be useful in individual patients, also when using our algorithm. However, subtracting nine from the mean remembered pre-operative score in a group of patients with any of the above diagnoses gives the real pre-operative score within the 95% confidence interval of four above and four below the real score.

The reliability of remembered pre-operative patient-rated wrist and hand evaluation (PRWHE) scores.

In clinical audits where pre-operative patient-rated wrist and hand evaluation (PRWHE) scores were not recorded, it would be useful if such scores could be recreated at the time of review. We recorded a PRWHE score during the last week before surgery for 143 patients. They were contacted after 21 months and asked to furnish a new PRWHE of the state they were in during the last week before surgery. 80 (56%) of the patients responded. The mean difference was 10 (SD: 20; SEM: 2) higher remembered pre-operative score. The limits of 95% agreement for individual scores were -29 and 50, while the 95% confidence interval of the mean was 6-15. If 10 is subtracted from the mean remembered preoperative score of a group of patients, the real pre-operative score will with 95% confidence be this score plus/minus 4. Remembered pre-operative PRWHE scores are far too inaccurate to be of value in individual patients. It may be possible to predict the mean real pre-operative PRWHE score in groups of patients with useful accuracy using the remembered pre-operative score.

Wide Awake Hand Surgery.

BACKGROUND: "Wide awake hand surgery", where surgery is performed in local anaesthesia with adrenaline, without sedation or a tourniquet, has become widespread in some countries. It has a number of potential advantages and we wished to evaluate it among our patients. METHODS: All 122 patients treated by this method during one year were evaluated by the surgeons and the patients on a numerical scale from 0 (best/least) to 10 (worst/most). Theatre time was compared to that recorded for a year when regional or general anaesthesia had been used. RESULTS: The patients' mean score for the general care they had received was 0.1 (SD 0.6), for pain during lidocaine injection 2.4 (SD 2.2), for pain during surgery 0.9 (SD 1.5), and for other discomfort during surgery 0.5 (SD 1.4). Eight reported that they would want general anaesthesia if they were to be operated again. The surgeons' mean evaluation of bleeding during surgery was 1.6 (SD 1.8), oedema during surgery 0.4 (SD 1.1), general disadvantages with the method 1.0 (SD 1.6) and general advantages 6.5 (SD 4.3). The estimation of advantages was 9.9 (DS 0.5) for tendon suture. 28 patients needed intra-operative additional anaesthesia. The proportion was lower among trained hand surgeons and fell significantly during the study period. Non-surgical theatre time was 46 (SD 15) minutes during the study period and 55 (SD 22) minutes during the regional/general period (p < 0.001). This gain was cancelled out by a longer surgery time during the wide awake period. CONCLUSIONS: Wide awake surgery is fully acceptable to most patients. It has a number of advantages over general or regional anaesthesia, but we feel it is unlikely to improve the efficiency of the operating theatre.

Reduced pain when injecting lidocaine. / Mindre smerte ved lokalbedøvelse.

Pain on injection of lidocaine is often considered a necessary evil, but it can be reduced by simple means.

The influence of Lidocaine temperature on pain during subcutaneous injection.

BACKGROUND: Injection of local anaesthetics is an uncomfortable procedure. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of lidocaine temperature on pain during subcutaneous injection. METHODS: A randomised, double blind trial with 36 healthy volunteers was performed. Each subject received three injections of 4.5 ml 1% lidocaine subcutaneously on the abdomen; refrigerated (8 °C), at room temperature (21 °C), and warmed to body temperature (37 °C). By giving every subject injections of all three temperatures they served as their own controls. The participants were asked to evaluate the pain felt during the injection by placing a pencil mark on a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale without intermediate markings immediately after every injection. They were told that the scale ranged from no pain to worst imaginable pain (0 = best; 100 = worst). Retrospectively the participants did a verbal assessment of the most and least painful injection. RESULTS: The median VAS score for the heated lidocaine was 16 (range =11-28), lidocaine at room temperature 25 (13-40) and for the cold 24 (11-35). The VAS scores for the heated lidocaine was significantly lower than for lidocaine at room temperature (p = 0.004). Also, the verbal assessment of heated lidocaine being less painful than the injection at room temperature was statistically significant (p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Injection with lidocaine heated to around body temperature was less painful than injection with lidocaine at room temperature. There was no statistically significant difference in verbal assessment or VAS scores between the cold lidocaine and that at room temperature.

The Influence of Injected Volume on Discomfort During Administration of Digital Block.

BACKGROUND: Digital nerve block is associated with pain. In a search for methods to reduce the discomfort, we investigated how the volume of anaesthetic fluid influences pain during subcutaneous digital nerve block, and how it affects the success of the anaesthesia. METHODS: A randomized blinded prospective study was performed on 36 healthy volunteers. The single injection subcutaneous digital block technique was used to anaesthetize the participants´ 4th digit on both hands. The same amount of lidocaine was used, but in two different volumes; 1 ml 2% lidocaine and 2ml 1% lidocaine. After each injection the participant was asked to estimate pain intensity on a visual analogue scale (VAS). The distribution of anaesthesia was then measured by using a Semmes-Weinstein 4.56 monofilament. Finally, participants gave a verbal assessment of which injection was least painful. RESULTS: In total, 72 blocks were performed. There were no statistically significant differences in pain intensity or preference between the two groups. Furthermore, the 1 ml injection gave poorer anaesthesia and had longer time to onset. Neither injection anaesthetized the dorsal aspect of the proximal phalanx. CONCLUSIONS: The two volumes cause the same degree of discomfort. Greater volume gives a greater area of distribution and more rapid onset of anaesthesia. It seems unreasonable to use a smaller volume of more concentrated anaesthetic when performing the subcutaneous technique.

Dupuytren's Contracture. The Safety and Efficacy of Collagenase Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Our main goal was to see if treatment with collagenase injection is safe and effective and to assess patient satisfaction with this new treatment. METHODS: We prospectively followed 77 consecutive patients, treated for contracture in 91 fingers and 142 joints that received total of 109 collagenase injections. The patients were reviewed on the first and second day and at 4 and 12 months. A contracture reduced to five degrees or less at 12 months after the last injection, was considered to be a successful outcome. RESULTS: A mean of 1.2 injections were used per patient and 0.8 injections per joint. There was a significant improvement in mean passive extension deficit. Out of the 142 joints treated, 84 (59%) met our criterion for a successful outcome; 56 (80%) out of 70 MCP joints and 28 (39%) out of 72 PIP joints. There were also significant improvements in both hand function and pain. No serious adverse events were observed. The mean patient satisfaction with the treatment at the 12-month follow up was a VAS score of 78 (0 = none; 100 = complete) and only 11% stated that they would not have consented to the treatment if they had known the outcome in advance. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of Dupuytren's disease with collagenase injection is both safe and effective. It is now our primary treatment for Dupuytren's disease.

Abductor pollicis longus tendon interposition for arthrosis of the first carpo-metacarpal joint. Long-term results.

BACKGROUND: We performed an interposition arthroplasty using the abductor pollicis longus tendon for arthrosis in the basal joint of the thumb that needed surgery from 1995 to 2010. In 2001 47 patients (55 thumbs) were reviewed after 3.5 (1-5) years. The pain relief was excellent in 32 thumbs, and 25 patients improved their ability to perform daily tasks. Mobility was well preserved. Key pinch and grip strengths averaged 78% and 89%, respectively, of those in unaffected hands. We have now re-examined all 33 available patients (36 thumbs) 11-14 years after surgery. METHODS: Fourty one of the originally examined patients were still alive. Seven were too ill to attend a follow-up and one refused. The remainder were examined in a fashion as similar as possible to that at the original review. The patients' subjective estimations of pain during the last week and satisfaction with the cosmetic and general results were recorded on visual analogue scales. The patients' ability to perform various activities of daily living were recorded and they completed the Disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire. The mobility of the wrist and abduction of the thumb of the operated hands were recorded with a goniometer. Grip and pinch strength were measured and new radiographs were obtained. RESULTS: Key pinch strength had increased significantly over the last 10 years. The mobility was still good, except for thumb abduction, which had decreased with time. The median DASH score had fallen from 28 to 20 between the two reviews. There was insignificant further median loss of distance between the scaphoid and the metacarpal since the earlier review. CONCLUSIONS: The good results of this procedure found soon after surgery are maintained long-term.

The importance of needle gauge for pain during injection of lidocaine.

BACKGROUND: Local anaesthetics such as lidocaine are used both in minor and major surgical procedures, and can be painful. Different methods have been investigated to reduce the discomfort of the injections. This study investigated if different needle gauges can influence the pain experienced during injection of lidocaine. METHODS: A randomised study was performed on 36 healthy volunteers. Each participant received three injections of 3 ml 1% lidocaine subcutaneously on the abdomen using needles of different gauges. Following each injection, the participants evaluated the pain experienced on a visual analogue scale (VAS). After the session, they were asked to evaluate verbally which injection they found least and most painful. The VAS and verbal reports were used and compared to evaluate the difference between the two types of clinically reported pain scales. RESULTS: Twenty-one participants verbally reported the thinnest needle (27 gauge (G)) as least painful, compared to the intermediate (23 gauge; p = 0.013) and the thickest needle (21 gauge, p = 0.004). The mean VAS scores were 19 (SD = 13) for the 21 gauge, 18 (SD = 13) for the 23 gauge, and 16 (SD = 14) for the 27 gauge needles. CONCLUSION: A significant preponderance of respondents stated that there had been less pain using the thinnest needle. Mean VAS responses showed the same trend, but the differences between them were not statistically significant.

The influence of injection speed on pain during injection of local anaesthetic.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of injection speed on pain during injection of local anaesthetics. METHODS: In a blinded randomised study with 36 healthy volunteers, each volunteer received three injections of 4.5 ml lidocaine subcutaneously on the abdomen. The injections were given during 15 seconds (0.3 ml/s), 30 seconds (0.15 ml/s), and 45 seconds (0.1 ml/s). The needle tip remained beneath the skin for 45 seconds during all three injections. Participants rated the pain experienced on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) immediately after each injection. After the last injection, they were asked which injections were the least and most painful. RESULTS: The mean VAS pain score for the 15 seconds injections was 26 (SD = 19), for the 30 seconds injections 24 (SD = 19), and for the 45 seconds injections also 24 (SD = 18) (ns). Eight subjects preferred the 15 seconds injection, 15 preferred the 30 seconds injection, and 10 preferred the 45 seconds injection (ns). CONCLUSION: It is concluded that varying the injection speed between 0.3 ml/s and 0.1 ml/s has no influence on the pain experienced during subcutaneous injection of 4.5 ml lidocaine.

Simple Trapeziectomy for Arthrosis of the Basal Joint of the Thumb: 49 Thumbs Reviewed After Two Years.

BACKGROUND: Many different surgical strategies for arthrosis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb are described in the literature. In 2010 we changed our routine procedure from an interposition arthroplasty using the abductor pollicis longus (APL) tendon to simple trapeziectomy without suspension or interposition. The purpose of this study was to review the clinical outcome after trapeziectomy and to compare it to those we had achieved with the APL procedure. METHODS: We examined 49 hands operated with simple trapeziectomy during 2011-2012. Time between operation and review was 26 (15-26) months. Subjective estimation of pain before and after surgery and satisfaction with the general results were evaluated with visual analogue scales. The ability to participate in various activities of daily living before and after the operation were noted and patients completed the Quick-DASH and the PRWHE questionnaires. The mobility of the thumb and wrist were recorded and grip and key pinch strength were measured. The distance between the base of the first metacarpal and the scaphoid was noted on radiographs. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the present results and those we had achieved with the APL procedure regarding subjective estimation of pain and satisfaction, activities of daily living, mobility, strength and radiographic carpometacarpal distance. For many outcome parameters there was a non-significant trend for better results among the trapeziectomy patients, but increased clumsiness was reported by 20 of them. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that our results with simple trapeziectomy are at least as good as with the APL procedure. However, the considerable number of patients complaining of clumsiness is worrying.