Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 125(1): 34-9, 2006 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16482989

RESUMO

Faced with expectations to improve patient safety and contain costs, the US health care system is under increasing pressure to comprehensively and objectively account for nosocomial infections. Widely accepted nosocomial infection surveillance methods, however, are limited in scope, not sensitive, and applied inconsistently. In 907 inpatient admissions to Evanston Northwestern Healthcare hospitals (Evanston, IL), nosocomial infection identification by the Nosocomial Infection Marker (MedMined, Birmingham, AL), an electronic, laboratory-based marker, was compared with hospital-wide nosocomial infection detection by medical records review and established nosocomial infection detection methods. The sensitivity and specificity of marker analysis were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI 95], 0.76-0.96) and 0.984 (CI 95, 0.976, 0.992). Marker analysis also identified 11 intensive care unit-associated nosocomial infections (sensitivity, 1.0; specificity, 0.986). Nosocomial Infection Marker analysis had a comparable sensitivity (P > .3) to and lower specificity (P < .001) than medical records review. It is important to note that marker analysis statistically outperformed widely accepted surveillance methods, including hospital-wide detection by Study on the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control chart review and intensive care unit detection by National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance techniques.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Laboratórios Hospitalares , Sistemas Computadorizados de Registros Médicos , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Notificação de Doenças/normas , Humanos , Illinois/epidemiologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 27(2): 139-45, 2006 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16465630

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In 2002, the Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH; Chicago, Illinois) convened the Chicago-Area Neonatal MRSA Working Group (CANMWG) to discuss and compare approaches aimed at control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). To better understand these issues on a regional level, the CDPH and the Evanston Department of Health and Human Services (EDHHS; Evanston, Illinois) began an investigation. DESIGN: Survey to collect demographic, clinical, microbiologic, and epidemiologic data on individual cases and clusters of MRSA infection; an additional survey collected data on infection control practices. SETTING: Level III NICUs at Chicago-area hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Neonates and healthcare workers associated with the level III NICUs. METHODS: From June 2001 through September 2002, the participating hospitals reported all clusters of MRSA infection in their respective level III NICUs to the CDPH and the EDHHS. RESULTS: Thirteen clusters of MRSA infection were detected in level III NICUs, and 149 MRSA-positive infants were reported. Infection control surveys showed that hospitals took different approaches for controlling MRSA colonization and infection in NICUs. CONCLUSION: The CANMWG developed recommendations for the prevention and control of MRSA colonization and infection in the NICU and agreed that recommendations should expand to include future data generated by further studies. Continuing partnerships between hospital infection control personnel and public health professionals will be crucial in honing appropriate guidelines for effective approaches to the management and control of MRSA colonization and infection in NICUs.


Assuntos
Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Resistência a Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Chicago/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/transmissão , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos
3.
J Mol Diagn ; 6(3): 191-6, 2004 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15269294

RESUMO

Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus is considered a source of subsequent infection in health care settings. Utilization of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of S. aureus has the potential to dramatically affect infection control practice by rapidly identifying S. aureus-colonized patients. We developed and validated the use of real-time PCR for detection of S. aureus colonization in two patient populations. Paired nasal swabs were collected from 299 neonates and from 151 adult patients at Evanston Hospital. One swab was used for culture and the other placed into a bacterial lysis solution containing achromopeptidase. The DNA liberated was used as the template for real-time PCR with primers for the femA gene. SYBR Green was used for amplicon detection. In the neonatal population the sensitivity, specificity, predictive value positive and predictive value negative for culture and PCR was 92% versus 96%, 100% versus 100%, 100% versus 100%, and 98% versus 99%, respectively. In the adults the results were 90% versus 100%, 100% versus 98%, 100% versus 96%, and 95% versus 100%, respectively. Real-time PCR was able to detect S. aureus in 2 hours compared to 1 to 4 days for culture and provided sensitivity equal to or greater than culture.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Nariz/microbiologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Primers do DNA/genética , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Staphylococcus aureus/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA