Impact of Baricitinib on Patients' Quality of Life after One Year of Treatment for Atopic Dermatitis in Real-World Practice: Results of the Observatory of Chronic Inflammatory Skin Diseases Registry.

The efficacy and safety of baricitinib for treatment of atopic dermatitis have been demonstrated in clinical trials; however, very few real-life studies have been published to date. The Observatory of Chronic Inflammatory Skin Diseases (OMCCI) registry was initiated to prospectively determine the long-term impairment caused by chronic inflammatory dermatoses on patients' lives. The study included 88 patients starting baricitinib for treatment of atopic dermatitis. Clinical evaluation and patient-reported outcomes were recorded at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. After 6 months and 1 year of follow-up, 65 and 47 patients, respectively, were still being treated with baricitinib. Treatment failure was the main reason for discontinuation. Only 1 patient stopped baricitinib because of a side-effect. After 1 year of follow-up, the mean Eczema Area and Severity Index score decreased significantly from 20.7 to 6.4; the percentage of patients with severe atopic dermatitis decreased from 42.9% to 6.5% and a significant improvement in most patient-reported outcomes was noted. There was no difference in terms of efficacy whether or not patients were previously treated with dupilumab. The results remained stable after 6 and 12 months of treatment, which suggests a sustained efficacy of the treatment in patients who initially responded well.

Disseminated Herpes Zoster During COVID-19.

During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, a variety of dermatological conditions were reported by physicians. Given the context, these lesions have been labeled as secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection. We report the case of a recurrence of herpes zoster in a patient hospitalized with an SARS-CoV-2 infection. The rash occurred on the 15th day of hospitalization while the patient was recovering from a severe form. Local swab showed the presence of varicella-zoster virus within the vesicles. Dermatological symptoms secondary to COVID-19 have been frequently described. This is the first case that demonstrates the recurrence of herpes zoster during a SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Sézary syndrome without erythroderma.

BACKGROUND: Sézary syndrome is a cutaneous T-cell lymphoma characterized by erythroderma and leukemic involvement. OBJECTIVE: We sought to define the clinical, biologic, and histopathologic features of Sézary syndrome without erythroderma. METHODS: Features of patients with Sézary syndrome and normal-appearing skin or stage-T1 patches, fulfilling Sézary syndrome hematologic criteria and with histologically documented disease in normal-appearing skin were collected. Expression of Sézary syndrome molecular biomarkers in peripheral blood and skin lymphocytes were studied. RESULTS: Five women and 1 man (median age: 71 years) were all referred for generalized pruritus. Four had no specific lesions; 2 had T1-stage patches. Histologic examination of normal-appearing skin from all patients showed lesions compatible with Sézary syndrome. Peripheral blood lymphocytes from 3 of 4 patients tested strongly expressed PLS3, Twist-1, and KIR3DL2. All normal-appearing skin biopsy specimens expressed programmed death-1. Median follow-up was 9 years. Although no patient developed erythroderma, tumors, or abnormal lymph nodes, specific skin lesions appeared in all patients during follow-up. Only 1 death, unrelated to Sézary syndrome, occurred. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design and small sample size are limitations. CONCLUSION: Sézary syndrome without erythroderma is a rare entity that may have a better prognosis than classic Sézary syndrome.

Vulvar verruciform xanthoma: ten cases associated with lichen sclerosus, lichen planus, or other conditions.

BACKGROUND: Verruciform xanthoma (VX) is a rare benign tumor that usually involves the oral cavity. Since the first report of this tumor in 1971, only 9 cases have been reported on the vulva, and 3 of these were associated with another vulvar condition. We describe the clinicopathologic features of 10 patients with vulvar VX and focus on their associated conditions. OBSERVATION: The mean age of the patients was 68 years (range, 51-80 years). The VX lesions were asymptomatic, yellowish-orange verrucous plaques. The diagnosis was clinically suspected in 2 cases; other suggested diagnoses were condyloma or squamous cell carcinoma. All of the patients had an associated vulvar condition: lichen sclerosus (6 patients), lichen planus (2 patients), Paget disease, or radiodermatitis. Under microscopy, the VX lesions displayed parakeratosis, acanthosis without atypia, and elongated rete ridges. Xanthomatous cells were aggregated in the papillary dermis. CONCLUSIONS: Vulvar VX is a benign tumor with misleading clinical features. All 10 cases were associated with a vulvar condition, mainly a lichen sclerosus. Therefore, VX might represent a reaction pattern induced by different conditions, mainly characterized by damage to the dermoepidermal junction. When confronted with the diagnosis of vulvar VX, clinicians may look for an associated vulvar condition.