Homocysteine levels and disease duration independently correlate with coronary artery calcification in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence and extent of coronary artery calcification (CAC) as measured by electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and controls, and to identify variables associated with CAC in patients with SLE. METHODS: Female patients with SLE and matched controls were recruited; EBCT of the coronary arteries was performed, and laboratory values (including the homocysteine concentration, the lipid level, the high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP] concentration, the glomerular filtration rate [GFR], and the level of soluble CD154 [sCD154]) were determined. For patients, the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index and the SLE Disease Activity Index scores were recorded. Tests of association between the CAC score and the above-mentioned variables were performed. RESULTS: The incidence of CAC was higher in patients with SLE than in controls (P = 0.009), and patients had a higher mean raw CAC (rCAC) score (87.9 versus 9.6 in controls; P = 0.02). In particular, more CAC-positive patients than CAC-positive controls had rCAC scores above the 75th percentile (P = 0.003). Among both patients and controls, those with CAC were approximately 10 years older than those without CAC. In addition to age, a significant determinant of positive CAC status in both groups was the number of cardiovascular risk factors. In patients with SLE, CAC was associated with a higher homocysteine concentration, a lower GFR, and longer disease duration. In controls, the total cholesterol level correlated positively with CAC. When multivariate logistic regression methods were applied to candidate explanatory variables, homocysteine concentration, age, and disease duration (but not the levels of sCD154 or hsCRP) contributed significantly to CAC status. The methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T genotype was not a predictor of hyperhomocysteinemia or CAC status. CONCLUSION: Among patients with SLE, the homocysteine concentration, the GFR, age, and disease duration were associated with CAC. CAC occurred more frequently and was more extensive in patients with SLE than in controls, suggesting that EBCT could be used to detect premature atherosclerosis in the former group. An elevated homocysteine concentration might identify patients with SLE who are likely to have premature atherosclerosis and who would benefit from evaluation of CAC by EBCT.

Decreased pain and synovial inflammation after etanercept therapy in patients with reactive and undifferentiated arthritis: an open-label trial.

OBJECTIVE: Elevated levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) have been identified in the synovium of patients with reactive and undifferentiated arthritis, implicating TNFalpha in the pathogenesis of these disorders. This finding has provided a rationale for the use of TNFalpha antagonists in the treatment of reactive arthritis; however, the possibility that the triggering microorganism might persist in affected joints and become activated with use of these agents has been of concern. METHODS: The efficacy and safety of etanercept (25 mg subcutaneous twice weekly) in 16 patients with undifferentiated or reactive arthritis was assessed in a 6-month open-label trial. Synovial biopsies were performed before and after treatment with etanercept. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis was performed on the synovial biopsy samples to evaluate for the presence of nucleic acid material of bacterial organisms. Outcome measures including tender and swollen joint counts, pain assessment on a 10-point visual analog scale, and functional ability as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire were determined before and after etanercept therapy. RESULTS: Ten of 16 patients completed the trial. Six patients withdrew, but none had a worsening of arthritis or infection. Of the 10 completers, 9 could be classified as treatment responders, despite the evidence of bacterial organisms on PCR analysis prior to initiating etanercept in 3 patients; 2 patients became PCR negative on etanercept. Five of 6 patients with adequate synovial biopsy specimens showed improvement, but not normalization of histology. CONCLUSION: Etanercept was well-tolerated without clinical exacerbation of any suspected underlying infections and appeared to provide therapeutic benefit in our cohort of patients with reactive and undifferentiated arthritis.