Exhaled isoprene for monitoring recovery from acute hypoxic stress.

Hypoxia-like incidents in-flight have increased over the past decade causing severe safety concerns across the aviation community. As a result, the need to monitor flight crews in real-time for the onset of hypoxic conditions is paramount for continued aeronautical safety. Here, hypoxic events were simulated in the laboratory via a reduced oxygen-breathing device to determine the effect of recovery gas oxygen concentration (21% and 100%) on exhaled breath volatile organic compound composition. Data from samples collected both serially (throughout the exposure), prior to, and following exposures yielded 326 statistically significant features, 203 of which were unique. Of those, 72 features were tentatively identified while 51 were verified with authentic standards. A comparison of samples collected serially between recovery and hypoxia time points shows a statistically significant reduction in exhaled breath isoprene (2-methyl-1,3-butadiene, log2 FC -0.399, p = 0.005, FDR = 0.034, q = 0.033), however no significant difference in isoprene abundance was observed when comparing recovery gases (21% or 100% O2, p = 0.152). Furthermore, examination of pre-/post-exposure 1 l bag breath samples illustrate an overall increase in exhaled isoprene abundance post-exposure (log2 FC 0.393, p = 0.005, FDR = 0.094, q = 0.033) but again no significant difference between recovery gas (21% and 100%, p = 0.798) was observed. A statistically significant difference in trend was observed between isoprene abundance and recovery gases O2 concentration when plotted against minimum oxygen saturation (p = 0.0419 100% O2, p = 0.7034 21% O2). Collectively, these results suggest exhaled isoprene is dynamic in the laboratory ROBD setup and additional experimentation will be required to fully understand the dynamics of isoprene in response to acute hypoxic stress.

Characterization of exposure to byproducts from firing lead-free frangible ammunition in an enclosed, ventilated firing range.

U.S. Air Force small arms firing ranges began using copper-based, lead-free frangible ammunition in the early 2000s due to environmental and health concerns related to the use of lead-based ammunition. Exposure assessments at these firing ranges have routinely detected chemicals and metals in amounts much lower than their mass-based occupational exposure limits, yet, instructors report work-related health concerns including respiratory distress, nausea, and headache. The objective of this study at one firing range was to characterize the aerosol emissions produced by weapons during firing events and evaluate the ventilation system's effectiveness in controlling instructor exposure to these emissions. The ventilation system was assessed by measuring the range static air pressure differential and the air velocity at the firing line. Air flow patterns were near the firing line. Instructor exposure was sampled using a filter-based air sampling method for metals and a wearable, real-time ultrafine particle counter. Area air sampling was simultaneously performed to characterize the particle size distribution, morphology, and composition. In the instructor's breathing zone, the airborne mass concentration of copper was low (range = <1 µg/m3 to 16 µg/m3), yet the ultrafine (nanoscale) particle number concentration increased substantially during each firing event. Ultrafine particles contained some copper and were complex in morphology and composition. The ventilation assessment found that the average velocity across all shooting lanes was acceptable compared to the recommended guideline (20% of the ideal 0.38 m/s (75 ft/min). However, uniform, downrange airflow pattern requirements were not met. These results suggest that the mass-based occupational exposure limits, as applied to this environment, may not be protective enough to eliminate health complaints reported by instructors whose full-time job involves training personnel on weapons that fire lead-free frangible ammunition. Using an ultrafine particle counter appears to be an alternative method of assessing ventilation effectiveness in removing ultrafine particulate produced during firing events.