The common marmoset as a translational model of age-related osteoarthritis.

Age-related osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease characterized by pathological changes in nearly every intra- and peri-articular tissue that contributes to disability in older adults. Studying the etiology of age-related OA in humans is difficult due to an unpredictable onset and insidious nature. A barrier in developing OA modifying therapies is the lack of translational models that replicate human joint anatomy and age-related OA progression. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the common marmoset is a faithful model of human age-related knee OA. Semi-quantitative microCT scoring revealed greater radiographic OA in geriatric versus adult marmosets, and the age-related increase in OA prevalence was similar between marmosets and humans. Quantitative assessments indicate greater medial tibial cortical and trabecular bone thickness and heterogeneity in geriatric versus adult marmosets which is consistent with an age-related increase in focal subchondral bone sclerosis. Additionally, marmosets displayed an age-associated increase in synovitis and calcification of the meniscus and patella. Histological OA pathology in the medial tibial plateau was greater in geriatric versus adult marmosets driven by articular cartilage damage, proteoglycan loss, and altered chondrocyte cellularity. The age-associated increase in medial tibial cartilage OA pathology and meniscal calcification was greater in female versus male geriatric marmosets. Overall, marmosets largely replicate human OA as evident by similar 1) cartilage and skeletal morphology, 2) age-related progression in OA pathology, and 3) sex differences in OA pathology with increasing age. Collectively, these data suggest that the common marmoset is a highly translatable model of the naturally occurring, age-related OA seen in humans.

Moving forward: A review of continuous kinetics and kinematics during handcycling propulsion.

Wheelchair users (WCUs) face high rates of shoulder overuse injuries. As exercise is recommended to reduce cardiovascular disease prevalent among WCUs, it is becoming increasingly important to understand the mechanisms behind shoulder soft-tissue injury in WCUs. Understanding the kinetics and kinematics during upper-limb propulsion is the first step toward evaluating soft-tissue injury risk in WCUs. This paper examines continuous kinetic and kinematic data available in the literature. Attach-unit and recumbent handcycling are examined and compared. Athletic modes of propulsion such as recumbent handcycling are important considering the higher contact forces, speed, and power outputs experienced during these activities that could put users at increased risk of injury. Understanding the underlying kinetics and kinematics during various propulsion modes can lend insight into shoulder loading, and therefore injury risk, during these activities and inform future exercise guidelines for WCUs.

Propulsion kinetics of recumbent handcycling during high and moderate intensity exercise.

People with spinal cord injuries (PwSCI) are at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). While regular exercise can reduce risk of CVD, PwSCI face various barriers to exercise, including high rates of upper limb injuries, especially in the shoulder. Handcycling high intensity interval training (HIIT), which consists of periods of high intensity exercise followed by rest, is a potential exercise solution, but the musculoskeletal safety of HIIT is still unknown. In this study, we characterized three-dimensional continuous applied forces at the handle during handcycling HIIT and moderate intensity continuous training (MICT). These applied forces can give an early indication of joint loading, and therefore injury risk, at the shoulder. In all three directions (tangential, radial, and lateral), the maximum applied forces during HIIT were larger than those in MICT at all timepoints, which may indicate higher contact forces and loads on the shoulder during HIIT compared to MICT. The tangential and radial forces peaked twice in a propulsion cycle, while the lateral forces peaked once. Throughout the exercises, the location of tangential peak 2 and radial peak 1 was later in HIIT compared to MICT. This difference in maximum force location could indicate either altered kinematics or muscular fatigue at the end of the exercise protocol. These changes in kinematics should be more closely examined using motion capture or other modeling techniques. If we combine this kinetic data with kinematic data during propulsion, we can create musculoskeletal models that more accurately predict contact forces and injury risk during handcycling HIIT in PwSCI.