Amiodarone for sustained stable ventricular tachycardia in the prehospital setting.

OBJECTIVE: Amiodarone is commonly used in the treatment of stable ventricular tachycardia (VT), but its efficacy has not been empirically examined in the prehospital setting. The objective of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of amiodarone administered by paramedics to patients with stable VT. METHODS: Patient records from Victoria, Australia between 1 May 2007 and 30 June 2017 were examined retrospectively. Patients attended by Ambulance Victoria with stable sustained VT who were administered amiodarone by paramedics as the initial treatment were included. Data were used to determine the prevalence of treatment with amiodarone, the incidence of VT termination prior to transfer of care, and the incidence of progression to electrical cardioversion. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were identified who met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 72 years (standard deviation = 14) with 77% (n = 47) being male. Of the patients treated with amiodarone, 52% (n = 32) reverted successfully during paramedic care while 48% (n = 29) did not. Two patients required cardioversion for haemodynamic instability after amiodarone administration. One patient experienced cardiac arrest after receiving amiodarone and was successfully resuscitated by paramedics. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of the patients treated with amiodarone reverted from VT while under paramedic care. Patient deterioration was rare, with cardiac arrest or requirement for cardioversion occurring very infrequently. Amiodarone was relatively safe and moderately effective for the treatment of sustained stable VT. However, given recent evidence of increased efficacy of procainamide for stable VT, further studies are required in the prehospital setting to compare these two drugs.

A survey of front-line paramedics examining the professional relationship between paramedics and physician medical oversight.

OBJECTIVE: Paramedicine is often dependent on physician medical directors and their associated programs for direction and oversight. A positive relationship between paramedics and their oversight physicians promotes safety and quality care while a strained or ineffective one may threaten these goals. The objective of this study was to explore and understand the professional relationship between paramedics and physician medical oversight as viewed by front-line paramedics. METHODS: All active front-line paramedics from four municipal paramedic services involving three medical oversight groups in Ontario were invited to complete an online survey. RESULTS: Five hundred and four paramedics were invited to participate in the study, with 242 completing the survey (48% response rate); 66% male, 76% primary care paramedics with an average of 13 (SD=9) years of experience. Paramedics had neutral or positive perceptions regarding their autonomy, opportunities to interact with their medical director, and medical director understanding of the prehospital setting. Paramedics perceived medical directives as rigid and ambiguous. A significant amount of respondents reported a perception of having provided suboptimal patient care due to fear of legal or disciplinary consequences. Issues of a lack of support for critical thinking and a lack of trust between paramedics and medical oversight groups were often raised. CONCLUSIONS: Paramedic perceptions of physician medical oversight were mixed. Concerning areas identified were perceptions of ambiguous written directives and concerns related to the level of trust and support for critical thinking. These perceptions may have implications for the system of care and should be explored further.