Penetrating esophageal injuries: multicenter study of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to define the period of time after which delays in management incurred by investigations cause increased morbidity and mortality. The outcome study is intended to correlate time with death from esophageal causes, overall complications, esophageal related complications, and surgical intensive care unit length of stay. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study involving 34 trauma centers in the United States, under the auspices of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-institutional Trials Committee over a span of 10.5 years. Patients surviving to reach the operating room (OR) were divided into two groups: those that underwent diagnostic studies to identify their injuries (preoperative evaluation group) and those that went immediately to the OR (no preoperative evaluation group). Statistical methods included Fisher's exact test, Student's T test, and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The study involved 405 patients: 355 male patients (86.5%) and 50 female patients (13.5%). The mean Revised Trauma Score was 6.3, the mean Injury Severity Score was 28, and the mean time interval to the OR was 6.5 hours. There were associated injuries in 356 patients (88%), and an overall complication rate of 53.5%. Overall mortality was 78 of 405 (19%). Three hundred forty-six patients survived to reach the OR: 171 in the preoperative evaluation group and 175 in the no preoperative evaluation group. No statistically significant differences were noted in the two groups in the following parameters: number of patients, age, Injury Severity Score, admission blood pressure, anatomic location of injury (cervical or thoracic), surgical management (primary repair, resection and anastomosis, resection and diversion, flaps), number of associated injuries, and mortality. Average length of time to the OR was 13 hours in the preoperative evaluation group versus 1 hour in the no preoperative evaluation group (p < 0.001). Overall complications occurred in 134 in the preoperative evaluation group versus 87 in the no preoperative evaluation group (p < 0.001), and 74 (41%) esophageal related complications occurred in the preoperative evaluation group versus 32 (19%) in the no preoperative evaluation group (p = 0.003). Mean surgical intensive care unit length of stay was 11 days in the preoperative evaluation group versus 7 days in the no preoperative evaluation group (p = 0.012). Logistic regression analysis identified as independent risk factors for the development of esophageal related complications included time delays in preoperative evaluation (odds ratio, 3.13), American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale grade >2 (odds ratio, 2.62), and resection and diversion (odds ratio, 4.47). CONCLUSION: Esophageal injuries carry a high morbidity and mortality. Increased esophageal related morbidity occurs with the diagnostic workup and its inherent delay in operative repair of these injuries. For centers practicing selective management of penetrating neck injuries and transmediastinal gunshot wounds, rapid diagnosis and definitive repair should be made a high priority.

Abdominal vascular injuries: injuries to the aorta.

This article discusses injuries to the abdominal aorta at its supra- and infrarenal positions, focusing on the surgical approaches to abdominal aorta injuries and renal vascular pedicles. The controversy regarding the use of bioprosthetic materials and the coLlective experience with these injuries as reported in the literature are reviewed. Primary renal artery repair versus nephrectomy also is examined.

Reliable variables in the exsanguinated patient which indicate damage control and predict outcome.

BACKGROUND: Exsanguination as a syndrome is ill defined. The objectives of this study were to investigate the relationship between survival and patient characteristics--vital signs, factors relating to injury and treatment; determine if threshold levels of pH, temperature, and highest estimated blood loss can predict survival; and identify predictive factors for survival and to initiate damage control. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective 6-year study was conducted, 1993 to 1998. In all, 548 patients met one or more criteria: (1) estimated blood loss > or =2,000 mL during trauma operation; (2) required > or =1,500 mL packed red blood cells (PRBC) during resuscitation; or (3) diagnosis of exsanguination. Analysis was made in two phases: (1) death versus survival in emergency department (ED); (2) death versus survival in operating room (OR). Statistical methods were Fisher's exact test, Student's t test, and logistic regression. RESULTS: For 548 patients, mean Revised Trauma Score 4.38, mean Injury Severity Score 32. Penetrating injuries 82% versus blunt injuries 18%. Vital statistics in emergency department: mean blood pressure 63 mm Hg, heart rate 78 beats per minute. Mean OR pH 7.15 and temperature 34.3 degrees C. Mortality was 379 of 548 (69%). Predictive factors for mortality (means): pH < or =7.2, temperature <34 degrees C, OR blood replacement >4,000 mL, total OR fluid replacement >10,000 mL, estimated blood loss >15 mL/minute (P <0.001). Analysis 1: death versus survival in ED, logistic regression. Independent risk factors for survival: penetrating trauma, spontaneous ventilation, and no ED thoracotomy (P <0.001; probability of survival 0.99613). Analysis 2: death versus survival in OR, logistic regression. Independent risk factors for survival: ISS < or =20, spontaneous ventilation in ED, OR PRBC replacement <4,000 mL, no ED or OR thoracotomy, absence of abdominal vascular injury (P <0.001, max R(2) 0.55, concordance 89%). CONCLUSIONS: Survival rates can be predicted in exsanguinating patients. "Damage control" should be performed using these criteria. Knowledge of these patterns can be valuable in treatment selection.

Operative management and outcome of 302 abdominal vascular injuries.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal vascular injuries incur high mortality rates. The purposes of this study are (1) review institutional experience, (2) determine additive effect on mortality of multiple vessel injuries, (3) determine mortality of combined arterial and venous injuries, and (4) correlate mortality with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale (AAST-OIS) for abdominal vascular injury. METHODS: A retrospective 6-year study was made at an urban level I trauma center of patients with abdominal vascular injuries. Main outcome measure was survival. RESULTS: (1) There was a total of 302 patients, mean age 28, mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) 25 (range 4 to 75). Mechanism of injury was penetrating in 266 (88%), blunt in 36 (12%). Emergency Department thoracotomy was done in 43 of 302 (14%), 504 vessels were injured: arteries 238(47%), veins 266(53%). Surgical management was ligation 245, primary repair 141, prosthetic interposition grafts 24, autogenous 2. Overall mortality was 162 of 302 (54%). (2) Mortality multiple vessels injured: 1 vessel 160 (45%), 2 vessels 102 (60%), 3 vessels 33 (73%), >4 vessels 5 (100%). Mortality arterial injuries: aorta isolated (I) 78% versus combined with other arterial injuries (C) 82.4%, superior mesenteric artery (SMA) I 47.6% versus C 71.4%, iliac I 53% versus C 72.7%, renal I 37.5% versus C 66.7%. Venous injuries: inferior vena cava (IVC) isolated (I) 70% versus combined with other venous injuries (C) 77.7%, superior mesenteric vein (SMV) I 52.7% versus C 65%, IMV I 16% versus C 50%. (3) Specific mortality combined arterial and venous injuries: aorta plus IVC 93%, SMA plus SMV 43%, iliac artery plus vein 45.5%. (4) Mortality versus AAST-OIS: grade II 25%, grade III 32%, grade IV 65%, grade V 88%. CONCLUSION: Abdominal vascular injuries are highly lethal. Multiple arterial and venous injuries increase mortality. Mortality correlates with AAST-OIS for abdominal vascular injury.