Kidney and liver transplantation in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Transplant surgery is facing a shortage of deceased donor organs. In response, the criteria for organ donation have been extended, and an increasing number of organs from older donors are being used. For recipients, the benefits of transplantation are great, and the growing ageing population has led to increasing numbers of elderly patients being accepted for transplantation. METHODS: The literature was reviewed to investigate the impact of age of donors and recipients in abdominal organ transplantation, and to highlight aspects of the fine balance in donor and recipient selection and screening, as well as allocation policies fair to young and old alike. RESULTS: Overall, kidney and liver transplantation from older deceased donors have good outcomes, but are not as good as those from younger donors. Careful donor selection based on risk indices, and potentially biomarkers, special allocation schemes to match elderly donors with elderly recipients, and vigorous recipient selection, allows good outcomes with increasing age of both donors and recipients. The results of live kidney donation have been excellent for donor and recipient, and there is a trend towards inclusion of older donors. Future strategies, including personalized immunosuppression for older recipients as well as machine preservation and reconditioning of donor organs, are promising ways to improve the outcome of transplantation between older donors and older recipients. CONCLUSION: Kidney and liver transplantation in the elderly is a clinical reality. Outcomes are good, but can be optimized by using strategies that modify donor risk factors and recipient co-morbidities, and personalized approaches to organ allocation and immunosuppression.

Impact of patient characteristics and comorbidity profile on activation of patients on the kidney transplantation waiting list.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine which demographic and comorbidity factors affected the activation of patients with end-stage renal disease on the national kidney transplantation waiting list. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study across 13 transplantation centers in the United Kingdom from October 1, 2006 to September 30, 2007. Data were collected for all new adult patients (n = 1530) referred to the renal transplantation assessment clinic. The proportion of patients who were activated to the waiting list after a minimum one year follow-up was estimated. Factors influencing activation of patients on the waiting list were examined. RESULTS: A total of 872 (58.9%) patients were activated to the transplantation waiting list. The likelihood of activation to the transplantation waiting list was lower in patients older than 65 years (P = .021), nonwhite ethnicity (P < .0001), smokers (P < .0001), and those in whom diabetes was the cause of renal failure (P = .004). Multivariate analysis showed that there was an adverse impact of comorbidity such as ischemic heart disease (P = .003), diabetes (P = .006), and peripheral vascular disease (P = .007) on the likelihood of activation to the waiting list. CONCLUSION: Patient characteristics and comorbidity are associated with the probability of activation of patients to the waiting list.

Uncovering a rare but critical complication following thyroid surgery: an audit across the UK and Ireland.

OBJECTIVE: Serious wound infection after thyroidectomy is uncommon, but actual incidence is not well documented in the literature. In the past a patient in our unit died secondary to fulminant streptococcal sepsis after thyroidectomy for benign disease. This prompted us to audit experience of serious wound infection among British Association of Endocrine Surgery (BAES) members. DESIGN: A questionnaire was posted to BAES members inquiring about experience of major wound infection following cervicotomy, incidence of minor wound infection, and prophylactic and therapeutic antibiotic usage. MAIN OUTCOME: Eight respondents experienced a case of fulminant wound infection after cervicotomy (8% total respondents). Five patients died and, in 6 patients, cases of streptococci were cultured. Then, 9% of respondents used prophylactic antibiotics routinely, 16% sometimes and 75% never. The most commonly used antibiotic was augmentin, and the most common reasons for use among those with a selective policy were re-operative cases (38%) and immunocompromised patients (38%). Also, 40% of respondents experienced major wound infection requiring intravenous antibiotics or surgical drainage. The most common choices of antibiotic used before sensitivities were obtained were augmentin (43%) and flucloxacillin (35%). CONCLUSIONS: Although rare, fulminant streptococcal wound infection after cervicotomy does occasionally occur and carries a high mortality.