The role of reflectance confocal microscopy in differentiating melanoma in situ from dysplastic nevi with severe atypia: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Melanoma in situ and dysplastic nevi with severe atypia present overlapping histopathologic features. Reflectance confocal microscopy findings can be integrated with the dermatopathology report to improve differentiation between melanoma and dysplastic nevi with severe atypia. OBJECTIVE: To compare prevalence of reflectance confocal microscopy findings between melanoma in situ and dysplastic nevi with severe atypia. METHODS: This retrospective observational study compared reflectance confocal microscopy findings in dermatopathologically diagnosed dysplastic nevi with severe atypia and melanoma in situ, collected between 2007 and 2017 at a private pigmented-lesion clinic. Concordant pathologic diagnosis was defined as unanimous agreement between 3 dermatopathologists who independently reviewed all cases; all other cases were classified as discordant. RESULTS: The study included 112 lesions, 62 concordant melanomas in situ, 28 concordant dysplastic nevi with severe atypia, and 22 discordant lesions. In comparing reflectance confocal microscopy findings in concordant cases, melanoma in situ showed more frequently than dysplastic nevi with severe atypia the presence of epidermal atypical melanocytes as round cells (19/62 vs 0/28; P < .001) and dendritic cells (50/62 vs 6/28; P < .001), as well as a diffuse distribution of epidermal atypical melanocytes (50/54 vs 3/6; P = .002). In contrast, dysplastic nevi with severe atypia showed the presence of dense melanocytic nests more frequently than melanoma in situ did (15/28 vs 14/62; P = .003). LIMITATIONS: The study was based on a limited number of lesions originating from a single clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Reflectance confocal microscopy findings may help differentiate a subset of dysplastic nevi with severe atypia from melanoma in situ.

Reflectance Confocal Microscopy Features of Focal Dermal Mucinosis Differ from Those Described for Basal Cell Carcinoma: Report of Two Cases.

The purpose of this study was to describe the reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) features of focal dermal mucinosis (FDM). The entity clinically and dermatoscopically mimics other diagnostic entities, most notably nonpigmented basal cell carcinoma. We describe two cases that highlight the dermatoscopic, RCM and histopathological attributes of FDM. RCM features such as dermal foci of dense collagen bundles oriented in the same direction, foci of haphazardly oriented thin collagen fibers separated by dark structureless areas and the absence of dark silhouettes and tumor islands are clues for FDM diagnosis. The FDM cases described here present consistent and particular RCM findings that appear to correlate well with the histopathological features of FDM. Therefore, RCM is a promising technology in diagnosing skin lesions and it use can avoid invasive procedures.

Through the looking glass: Basics and principles of reflectance confocal microscopy.

Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) offers high-resolution, noninvasive skin imaging and can help avoid obtaining unnecessary biopsy specimens. It can also increase efficiency in the surgical setting by helping to delineate tumor margins. Diagnostic criteria and several RCM algorithms have been published for the differentiation of benign and malignant neoplasms. We provide an overview of the basic principles of RCM, characteristic RCM features of normal skin and cutaneous neoplasms, and the limitations and future directions of RCM.