A single test to assay warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, unfractionated heparin, and enoxaparin in plasma.

UNLABELLED: Essentials Simple and fast assaying of different anticoagulants (ACs) is useful in emergent situations. We used highly diluted prothrombin time (dPT) or highly diluted Fiix-PT (dFiix-PT) to assay ACs. Both tests could quantify target specific anticoagulants and warfarin anticoagulation. Improved results were consistently observed with the dFiix-PT compared with the dPT. SUMMARY: Background Assaying anticoagulants is useful in emergency situations or before surgery. Different specific assays are currently needed depending on the anticoagulant. Objectives We hypothesized that levels of warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and heparins could be measured with use of the diluted prothrombin time (dPT) and diluted Fiix-PT (dFiix-PT), using highly diluted thromboplastin (TP). The latter test is affected only by reduced levels of active factors II and X but corrects test plasma for other deficiencies Methods Increasing TP dilutions were used to identify suitable dilutions to measure dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, unfractionated heparin (UFH), and enoxaparin. Calibrators containing known amounts of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were used to make standard curves. Citrated plasma samples were obtained from patients taking warfarin or DOACs with known drug concentrations as determined by specific assays. Results The dFiix-PT at a TP dilution of 1:1156 could be used to measure all of the drugs tested at therapeutic concentrations except for fondaparinux. The dPT achieved the same but required two TP dilutions (1:750 and 1:300). The warfarin effect could be assessed by using dFiix-PT at 1:1156 with a PT ratio identical to the international normalized ratio. Six different TPs yielded similar results, but two were less sensitive. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban could be accurately measured in patient samples using both dilute PT assays, but a better correlation was consistently observed between the dFiix-PT and specific assays than with the dPT. Conclusion The dFiix-PT using a single dilution of TP may be suitable to assess the anticoagulant effects of warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, heparin, and enoxaparin.

Evaluating the use of commercial drug-specific calibrators for determining PT and APTT reagent sensitivity to dabigatran and rivaroxaban.

Suitable laboratory methodologies for quantifying the non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) include liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) or drug-calibrated assays such as the dilute thrombin time for dabigatran or anti-Xa measurements for rivaroxaban. In situations when these tests are unavailable, it has been suggested that using commercial drug calibrators on APTT and PT assays would theoretically provide reagent sensitivity to these drugs. The purpose of this study was to determine whether commercial drug calibrators deliver similar reagent sensitivity information as samples from patients receiving dabigatran or rivaroxaban as part of their routine care. Two laboratory sites tested commercial calibrator material for dabigatran and rivaroxaban (Hyphen Biomedical) using PT and APTT reagents and data was compared to samples collected from patients taking NOACs that were quantified by LC-MS/MS. Correlation statistics and calculating the amount of drug required to double the clotting time of normal plasma were performed. All drug calibrator material correlated more strongly (R²> 0.95) for any reagent/drug combination than patient samples (R² ranged from 0.29-0.86). Dabigatran calibrator results and patient data were equivalent for SynthASil and PTT-A APTT reagents. The dabigatran and rivaroxaban calibrator material over-estimated drug sensitivity for all PT reagents when compared to sensitivity data calculated based on drug levels obtained by LC-MS/MS from patient samples. In conclusion, drug-specific calibrators overestimated reagent sensitivity which may underestimate in vivo drug concentration in a given patient. Further studies are required to assess whether this method of determining relative sensitivity of NOAC on routine coagulation assays should be recommended.