Anti-HLA-B7/HLA-B44 strong cross immunoreactivity observed in flow cytometry HLA-B27 immunotyping.

Cross reactivities are known for human leukocyte antigen inside HLA-B7 related Cross-Reactive Group (B7CREG). Some CE-IVD flow-cytometry kits use double monoclonal antibodies (mAb) to distinguish HLA-B27 and HLA-B7 but practice reveals more complexes results. This study explores the performances of this test. Analysis of 466 consecutive cases using HLA-B27 IOTest™ kit on a Navios™ cytometer from Beckman-Coulter, partially compared to their genotypes. Expected haplotypes HLA-B27-/HLA-B7- (undoubtedly HLA-B27 negative) and HLA-B27+/HLA-B7- (undoubtedly HLA-B27+) were clearly identified according to the manufacturer's instructions. On the opposite, patients strongly labeled with anti-HLA-B7 showed three different phenotypes regarding anti-HLA-B27 labeling: (1) most of the cases were poorly labeled in accordance with cross reactivity inside B7CREG (HLA-B27-/HLA-B7+ haplotype); (2) rare cases had strong B7 and B27 labeling corresponding to HLA-B27+/HLA-B7+ haplotype; (3) even less cases had strong labeling by anti-HLA-B7 but non for anti-HLA-B27, all expressing HLA-B44 and no B7CREG molecules. Surprisingly, more cases were not labeled with anti-HLA-B7 antibody but partially labeled with anti-HLA-B27 suggesting another cross reactivity out of B7CREG. mAb HLA typing suggests new, cross reactivities of anti-HLA-B27 antibody to more molecules out of B7CREG and of anti-HLA-B7 antibody but not anti-HLA-B27 to HLA-B44 molecule also out of B7CREG. HLA-B27 could surely be excluded in most samples labeled with HLA-B27, below a "grey zone" on intermediate intensity. More comparison is needed in future studies.

Proof-of-Concept Human Organ-on-Chip Study: First Step of Platform to Assess Neuro-Immunological Communication Involved in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are complex chronic inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Recent evidence suggests that the gut-brain axis may be pivotal in gastrointestinal and neurological diseases, especially IBD. Here, we present the first proof of concept for a microfluidic technology to model bilateral neuro-immunological communication. We designed a device composed of three compartments with an asymmetric channel that allows the isolation of soma and neurites thanks to microchannels and creates an in vitro synaptic compartment. Human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cortical glutamatergic neurons were maintained in soma compartments for up to 21 days. We performed a localized addition of dendritic cells (MoDCs) to either the soma or synaptic compartment. The microfluidic device was coupled with microelectrode arrays (MEAs) to assess the impact on the electrophysiological activity of neurons while adding dendritic cells. Our data highlight that an electrophysiologic signal is transmitted between two compartments of glutamatergic neurons linked by synapses in a bottom-up way when soma is exposed to primed dendritic cells. In conclusion, our study authenticates communication between dendritic cells and neurons in inflammatory conditions such as IBD. This platform opens the way to complexification with gut components to reach a device for pharmacological compound screening by blocking the gut-brain axis at a mucosal level and may help patients.

[Risk assessment and management: between epidemiology and social acceptability]. / Évaluation et gestion des risques : entre épidémiologie et acceptabilité sociale.

Risk is a well-known concept in medicine and in epidemiology and its approach intend to be rational and measurable. Risk measurement makes it possible to communicate with a patient or a population the risk of occurrence of an event. However, it is often difficult to estimate accurately the probability of occurrence of an adverse event and there is therefore uncertainty. In addition, the notion of risk is not easy to grasp for most people. The same risk can be perceived very differently from one individual to another and this perception and understanding depends on psychological, social, cultural, historical and political factors. Understanding this social dimension of risk in clinical practice or in public health is essential to implement efficient risk management.

La notion de risque est bien connue en médecine et en épidémiologie et son approche se veut rationnelle et mesurable. Cette mesure du risque permet de communiquer à un patient ou à une population le risque de survenue d'un événement. Mais il est souvent difficile d'estimer avec précision la probabilité de survenue d'un événement et il existe donc de l'incertitude. De plus, la notion de risque n'est pas facile à appréhender pour la plupart des personnes. Un même risque pourra être perçu très différemment d'un individu à l'autre et ces perception et compréhension des risques dépendent de facteurs psychologiques, sociaux, culturels, historiques et politiques. Bien comprendre cette dimension sociale du risque est essentiel pour appréhender une gestion des risques, que ce soit en clinique ou en santé publique.

Dynamics of circulating calprotectin accurately predict the outcome of moderate COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: Severe COVID-19 is associated with a high circulating level of calprotectin, the S100A8/S100A9 alarmin heterodimer. Baseline calprotectin amount measured in peripheral blood at diagnosis correlates with disease severity. The optimal use of this biomarker along COVID-19 course remains to be delineated. METHODS: We focused on patients with a WHO-defined moderate COVID-19 requiring hospitalization in a medical ward. We collected plasma and serum from three independent cohorts (N = 626 patients) and measured calprotectin amount at admission. We performed longitudinal measures of calprotectin in 457 of these patients (1461 samples) and used a joint latent class mixture model in which classes were defined by age, body mass index and comorbidities to identify calprotectin trajectories predicting the risk of transfer into an intensive care unit or death. FINDINGS: After adjustment for age, sex, body mass index and comorbidities, the predictive value of baseline calprotectin in patients with moderate COVID19 could be refined by serial monitoring of the biomarker. We discriminated three calprotectin trajectories associated with low, moderate, and high risk of poor outcome, and we designed an algorithm available as online software (https://calpla.gustaveroussy.fr:8443/) to monitor the probability of a poor outcome in individual patients with moderate COVID-19. INTERPRETATION: These results emphasize the clinical interest of serial monitoring of calprotectin amount in the peripheral blood to anticipate the risk of poor outcomes in patients with moderate COVID-19 hospitalized in a standard care unit. FUNDING: The study received support (research grants) from ThermoFisher immunodiagnostics (France) and Gustave Roussy Foundation.

Adalimumab and anti-adalimumab LISA-TRACKER immunoassays performance criteria for therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab-amgen biosimilar (ABP501).

BACKGROUND: ABP501 is a biosimilar to Reference Adalimumab (HUMIRA®) produced by AMGEN. Adalimumab (ADA) has a marketing authorization for Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis and other inflammatory or autoimmune diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the LISA-TRACKER assays developed by Theradiag (France), for the monitoring of ABP501 and anti-ABP501 antibodies in human serum. RESULTS: 68 ABP501 clinical samples were measured with the LISA TRACKER Duo Adalimumab assay. LISA TRACKER has been validated as suitable for quantification of ABP501 in human serum samples. Accuracy of the LISA-TRACKER was measured using 3 human serum matrices spiked with known levels of biosimilar, 3 levels spanning the dynamic range. Percentages of recovery were ranged from 90 to 120% for biosimilar batch1, and between 93 and 105% for biosimilar batch2. The acceptance criteria (CV < 20%) were met for intra-run (from 3.8 to 16.5%) and inter-run imprecision (from 4.4 to 13.9%) including the two batches. All results were comprised within ± 20% from results, obtained with the kit and sample unexposed in order to evaluate stability of the sample, stability of the kit and consistency of the results. In any case, but two, all percentages of inhibition were > 50% for specificity. Specificity was tested with Biosimilar spiked samples, Biosimilar with Humira® spiked samples, and clinical samples from patients treated with adalimumab biosimilar. All of these samples were spiked with polyclonal antibodies directed against Humira®. Specificity inhibition and specificity detection steps were also part of the validation parameters. Reagents made with ABP501 gave similar results than reagents made with Humira® meeting acceptance criteria. CONCLUSIONS: LISA-TRACKER ADA and anti-ADA assays are reliable for the monitoring of patients treated with ABP501.