Effects of nucleoside analogues, lipophilic prodrugs and elaidic acids on core signaling pathways in cancer cells.

OBJECTIVES: Nucleoside analogs such as gemcitabine (GEM; dFdC) and cytarabine (Ara-C) require nucleoside transporters to enter cells, and deficiency in equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT1) can lead to resistance to these drugs. To facilitate transport-independent uptake, prodrugs with a fatty acid chain attached to the 5'-position of the ribose group of gemcitabine or cytarabine were developed (CP-4126 and CP-4055, respectively). As antimetabolites can activate cellular survival pathways, we investigated whether the prodrugs or their side-chains had similar or decreased effects. METHODS: Two cell lines A549 (non-small cell lung cancer) and WiDr (colon cancer cells) were exposed for 2-24hr to IC50 concentrations of GEM, Ara-C, CP-4126, CP4055 and elaidic acid (EA) concentrations corresponding to the CP-4126 and CP-4055 IC50. Cells were harvested and analyzed for proteins in cell survival pathways (p-AKT/AKT, p-ERK/ERK, p-P38/P38, GSK-3ß/pGSK-3ß) by using Western Blotting. RESULTS: All drugs and their derivatives showed time- and cell-line-dependent effects. In A549 cells, GEM, CP-4126 and EA-4126 decreased the p-AKT/AKT ratio at 2 and 24 hr. For the p-ERK/ERK ratio, GEM, EA-4126, Ara-C, CP-4045 and EA-4055 exposure led to an increase after 6 hr in A549 cells. Interestingly, Ara-C, CP-4055 and EA-4055 decreased p-ERK/ERK ratio in WiDr cells after 4 hr. In A549 cells, the p-GSK-3ß/GSK-3ß ratio decreased after exposure to Ara-C and CP-4055 but in WiDr cells increased after 24 hr. In A549 cells treatment with Ara-C, CP-4055 and EA-4126 decreased the p-P38/P38 after 6 hr. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that both parent drugs, prodrugs, and the EA chain influence cell survival and signaling pathways.

Role of exosomes in transferring chemoresistance through modulation of cancer glycolytic cell metabolism.

Chemoresistance constitute a major obstacle in cancer treatment, leading to limited options and decreased patient survival. Recent studies have revealed a novel mechanism of chemoresistance acquisition: the transfer of information via exosomes, small vesicles secreted by various cells. Exosomes play a crucial role in intercellular communication by carrying proteins, nucleic acids, and metabolites, influencing cancer cell behavior and response to treatment. One crucial mechanism of resistance is cancer metabolic reprogramming, which involves alterations in the cellular metabolic pathways to support the survival and proliferation of drug-resistant cancer cells. This metabolic reprogramming often includes increased glycolysis, providing cancer cells with the necessary energy and building blocks to evade the effects of chemotherapy. Notably, exosomes have been found to transport glycolytic enzymes, as identified in proteomic profiling, leading to the reprogramming of metabolic pathways, facilitating altered glucose metabolism and increased lactate production. As a result, they profoundly impact the tumor microenvironment, promoting tumor progression, survival, immune evasion, and drug resistance.Understanding the complexities of such exosome-mediated cell-to-cell communication might open new therapeutic avenues and facilitate biomarker development in managing cancers characterized by aggressive glycolytic features. Moreover, given the intricate nature of metabolic abnormalities combining future exosome-based-targeted therapies with existing treatments like chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapies holds promise for achieving synergistic effects to overcome resistance and improve cancer treatment outcomes.

Target Therapy in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Hope or Mirage?

Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare neoplasm that is typically diagnosed in a locally advanced stage, making it not eligible for radical surgery and requiring systemic treatment. Chemotherapy with platinum compounds and pemetrexed has been the only approved standard of care for approximately 20 years, without any relevant therapeutic advance until the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Nevertheless, the prognosis remains poor, with an average survival of only 18 months. Thanks to a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying tumor biology, targeted therapy has become an essential therapeutic option in several solid malignancies. Unfortunately, most of the clinical trials evaluating potentially targeted drugs for MPM have failed. This review aims to present the main findings of the most promising targeted therapies in MPM, and to explore possible reasons leading to treatments failures. The ultimate goal is to determine whether there is still a place for continued preclinical/clinical research in this area.

Metabolic Effects of New Glucose Transporter (GLUT-1) and Lactate Dehydrogenase-A (LDH-A) Inhibitors against Chemoresistant Malignant Mesothelioma.

Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a highly aggressive and resistant tumor. The prognostic role of key effectors of glycolytic metabolism in MM prompted our studies on the cytotoxicity of new inhibitors of glucose transporter type 1 (GLUT-1) and lactate dehydrogenase-A (LDH-A) in relation to ATP/NAD+ metabolism, glycolysis and mitochondrial respiration. The antiproliferative activity of GLUT-1 (PGL13, PGL14) and LDH-A (NHI-1, NHI-2) inhibitors, alone and in combination, were tested with the sulforhodamine-B assay in peritoneal (MESO-II, STO) and pleural (NCI-H2052 and NCI-H28) MM and non-cancerous (HMEC-1) cells. Effects on energy metabolism were measured by both analysis of nucleotides using RP-HPLC and evaluation of glycolysis and respiration parameters using a Seahorse Analyzer system. All compounds reduced the growth of MM cells in the µmolar range. Interestingly, in H2052 cells, PGL14 decreased ATP concentration from 37 to 23 and NAD+ from 6.5 to 2.3 nmol/mg protein. NHI-2 reduced the ATP/ADP ratio by 76%. The metabolic effects of the inhibitors were stronger in pleural MM and in combination, while in HMEC-1 ATP reduction was 10% lower compared to that of the H2052 cells, and we observed a minor influence on mitochondrial respiration. To conclude, both inhibitors showed cytotoxicity in MM cells, associated with a decrease in ATP and NAD+, and were synergistic in the cells with the highest metabolic modulation. This underlines cellular energy metabolism as a potential target for combined treatments in selected cases of MM.