ADVANCES IN PHOTORECEPTOR AND RETINAL PIGMENT EPITHELIUM QUANTIFICATIONS IN INTERMEDIATE AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: High-Res Versus Standard SPECTRALIS Optical Coherence Tomography.

PURPOSE: In this study, differences in retinal feature visualization of high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices were investigated with different axial resolutions in quantifications of retinal pigment epithelium and photoreceptors (PRs) in intermediate age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: Patients were imaged with standard SPECTRALIS HRA + OCT and the investigational High-Res OCT device (both by Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). Drusen, retinal pigment epithelium, and PR layers were segmented using validated artificial intelligence-based algorithms followed by manual corrections. Thickness and drusen maps were computed for all patients. Loss and thickness measurements were compared between devices, drusen versus nondrusen areas, and early treatment diabetic retinopathy study subfields using mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Thirty-three eyes from 28 patients with intermediate age-related macular degeneration were included. Normalized PR integrity loss was significantly higher with 4.6% for standard OCT compared with 2.5% for High-Res OCT. The central and parafoveal PR integrity loss was larger than the perifoveal loss (P < 0.05). Photoreceptor thickness was increased on High-Res OCT and in nondrusen regions (P < 0.001). Retinal pigment epithelium appeared thicker on standard OCT and above drusen (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that High-Res OCT is able to identify the condition of investigated layers in intermediate age-related macular degeneration with higher precision. This improved in vivo imaging technology might promote our understanding of the pathophysiology and progression of age-related macular degeneration.

Advancing the visibility of outer retinal integrity in neovascular age-related macular degeneration with high-resolution OCT.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the visibility and accessibility of the outer retina in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) between 2 OCT devices. METHODS: In this prospective, cross-sectional exploratory study, differences in thickness and loss of individual outer retinal layers in eyes with nAMD and in age-matched healthy eyes between a next-level High-Res OCT device and the conventional SPECTRALIS OCT (both Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) were analyzed. Eyes with nAMD and at least 250 nL of retinal fluid, quantified by an approved deep-learning algorithm (Fluid Monitor, RetInSight, Vienna, Austria), fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The outer retinal layers were segmented using automated layer segmentation and were corrected manually. Layer loss and thickness were compared between both devices using a linear mixed-effects model and a paired t test. RESULTS: Nineteen eyes of 17 patients with active nAMD and 17 healthy eyes were included. For nAMD eyes, the thickness of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) differed significantly between the devices (25.42 µm [95% CI, 14.24-36.61] and 27.31 µm [95% CI, 16.12-38.50] for high-resolution OCT and conventional OCT, respectively; p = 0.033). Furthermore, a significant difference was found in the mean relative external limiting membrane loss (p = 0.021). However, the thickness of photoreceptors, RPE integrity loss, and photoreceptor integrity loss did not differ significantly between devices in the central 3 mm. In healthy eyes, a significant difference in both RPE and photoreceptor thickness between devices was shown (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Central RPE thickness was significantly thinner on high-resolution OCT compared with conventional OCT images explained by superior optical separation of the RPE and Bruch's membrane.

AI-based support for optical coherence tomography in age-related macular degeneration.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative technology across various fields, and its applications in the medical domain, particularly in ophthalmology, has gained significant attention. The vast amount of high-resolution image data, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, has been a driving force behind AI growth in this field. Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the leading causes for blindness in the world, affecting approximately 196 million people worldwide in 2020. Multimodal imaging has been for a long time the gold standard for diagnosing patients with AMD, however, currently treatment and follow-up in routine disease management are mainly driven by OCT imaging. AI-based algorithms have by their precision, reproducibility and speed, the potential to reliably quantify biomarkers, predict disease progression and assist treatment decisions in clinical routine as well as academic studies. This review paper aims to provide a summary of the current state of AI in AMD, focusing on its applications, challenges, and prospects.

A Systematic Prospective Comparison of Fluid Volume Evaluation across OCT Devices Used in Clinical Practice.

Objective: Treatment decisions in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) are mainly based on subjective evaluation of OCT. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to provide a comparison of qualitative and quantitative differences between OCT devices in a systematic manner. Design: Prospective, cross-sectional study. Subjects: One hundred sixty OCT volumes, 40 eyes of 40 patients with nAMD. Methods: Patients from clinical practice were imaged with 4 different OCT devices during one visit: (1) Spectralis Heidelberg; (2) Cirrus; (3) Topcon Maestro2; and (4) Topcon Triton. Intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) were manually annotated in all cubes by trained human experts to establish fluid measurements based on expert-reader annotations. Intraretinal fluid, SRF, and PED volume were quantified in nanoliters (nL). Bland-Altman plots were created to analyze the agreement of measurements in the central 1 and 6 mm. The Friedman test was performed to test for significant differences in the central 1, 3, and 6 mm. Main Outcome Measures: Intraretinal fluid, SRF, and PED volume. Results: In the central 6 mm, there was a trend toward higher IRF and PED volumes in Spectralis images compared with the other devices and no differences in SRF volume. In the central 1 mm, the standard deviation of the differences ranged from ± 3 nL to ± 6 nL for IRF, from ± 3 nL to ± 4 nL for SRF, and from ± 7 nL to ± 10 nL for PED in all pairwise comparisons. Manually annotated IRF and SRF volumes showed no significant differences in the central 1 mm. Conclusions: Fluid volume quantification achieved excellent reliability in all 3 retinal compartments on images obtained from 4 OCT devices, particularly for clinically relevant IRF and SRF values. Although fluid volume quantification is reliable in all 4 OCT devices, switching OCT devices might lead to deviating fluid volume measurements with higher agreement in the central 1 mm compared with the central 6 mm, with highest agreement for SRF volume in the central 1 mm. Understanding device-dependent differences is essential for expanding the interpretation and implementation of pixel-wise fluid volume measurements in clinical practice and in clinical trials. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.