Pregestational Diabetes Exposure In Utero: Validation of a Definition for Use in Administrative Data.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim in this study was to determine the best administrative data case definition for pregestational diabetes exposure. METHODS: We compared the performance of case definitions for pregestational diabetes exposure within the administrative health data housed in the Manitoba Population Health Research Repository at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy with an identified population of women in whom the diagnosis of pregestational diabetes was known from the clinical database of the Manitoba Diabetes Education Resource for Children and Adolescents (DER-CA) (August 12, 1989 through January 28, 2015). The DER-CA database contains maternal diabetes status during pregnancy and also includes women diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in childhood whose pregnancies were thus all complicated by pregestational diabetes exposure. Linkage of mother-child dyads is possible within the Repository. Diagnosis codes from the International Classification of Diseases---ninth or tenth revision and physician tariff codes were used to identify diabetes in the biologic mothers of children with type 2 diabetes identified from the DER-CA database. The timing of the diagnosis of diabetes in the mother with respect to the gestational age of the pregnancy was determined. RESULTS: The best administrative definition of pregestational diabetes exposure was any incident code for diabetes in the mother before the pregnancy of the index child or within the first 25 weeks of pregnancy (sensitivity: 84.77%; positive predictive value: 92%). CONCLUSION: The definition cited can be used to define pregestational diabetes exposure in studies utilizing administrative data.

Historical and Continued Colonial Impacts on Heart Health of Indigenous Peoples in Canada: What's Reconciliation Got to Do With It?

Colonization and enforced genocidal strategies have collectively fractured and changed Indigenous people by attempting to erase and dismiss their voices and knowledge. Nearly a decade ago, we were reminded by Dr Ku Young of the cardiovascular health disparities, in evidence among Indigenous people in Canada. compared with White people. He went on to say that beyond a biomedical understanding of this health status is the ongoing impact of long-standing marginalization and oppression faced by Indigenous people. Limited attention has been afforded to advance our understanding of these colonial impacts on Indigenous people and their heart health. This article contributes to our collective understanding of Indigenous people and their cardiac health by covering the following topics: layers of foundational truths of relevance to healthcare contexts and Indigenous people; a critical reflection of Western (biomedical) perspectives concerning cardiac health among Indigenous people; and materials from 2 studies, funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, in which Indigenous voices and experiences were privileged concerning the heart and caring for the heart. In the final section, 3 topics are offered as starting points for self-reflection and acts of reconciliation within healthcare practice, decision-making, and research: reflections on self and one's worldview; anti-racist healthcare practice; and 2-eyed seeing approaches to work within healthcare contexts. A common thread is the imperative for "un-silencing" Indigenous people's voices, experiences, and knowledge, which is a requirement if addressing the identified cardiovascular health disparities is truly a health priority.

La colonisation et les stratégies génocidaires mises en œuvre ont concouru à diviser et à transformer les peuples autochtones dans une tentative d'effacement et de rejet de leurs voix et de leurs connaissances. Il y a près d'une décennie, le Dr Ku Young nous a rappelé les disparités en matière de santé cardiovasculaire, mises en évidence chez les peuples autochtones du Canada comparativement aux blanches. Il a ensuite déclaré que, outre la dimension biomédicale de cette situation sanitaire, l'effet de la marginalisation et de l'oppression de longue date des peuples autochtones est en cause et qu'il continue de se faire sentir. Peu d'attention a été accordée à l'avancement de notre compréhension des effets de la colonisation sur les peuples autochtones et leur santé cardiaque. Le présent article contribue à notre compréhension collective des peuples autochtones et de leur santé cardiaque en abordant : les strates de vérités fondamentales importantes dans le contexte des soins de santé et pour les peuples autochtones; les points de vue occidentaux (biomédicaux) sur la santé cardiaque des peuples autochtones, sous l'angle d'une réflexion critique; les données de deux études, financées par les Instituts de recherche en santé du Canada, où les voix et le vécu des autochtones ont été privilégiés en matière de santé cardiaque et au regard de ce qu'elle implique. Dans la dernière partie de notre article, les trois thèmes suivants sont présentés comme autant de points de départ d'une autoréflexion et de gestes de réconciliation en matière de prestation de soins de santé, de prise de décision et de recherche : réflexion sur soi-même et sa vision du monde; prestation de soins de santé antiraciste; approche à double perspective des soins de santé. Il est impératif de briser le silence et de « laisser s'exprimer ¼ les voix, le vécu et les connaissances des peuples autochtones. Ce constat est un des fils conducteurs de notre analyse. Il faut agir en conséquence si tant est que l'élimination des disparités observées en matière de santé cardiovasculaire constitue vraiment une priorité sanitaire.

Association of Severe Trauma With Work and Earnings in a National Cohort in Canada.

Importance: Traumatic injury disproportionately affects adults of working age. The ability to work and earn income is a key patient-centered outcome. The association of severe injury with work and earnings appears to be unknown. Objective: To evaluate the association of severe traumatic injury with subsequent employment and earnings in long-term survivors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a retrospective, matched, national, population-based cohort study of adults who had employment and were hospitalized with severe traumatic injury in Canada between January 2008 and December 2010. All acute care hospitalizations for severe injury were included if they involved adults aged 30 to 61 years who were hospitalized with severe traumatic injury, working in the 2 years prior to injury, and alive through the third calendar year after their injury. Patients were matched with unexposed control participants based on age, sex, marital status, province of residence, rurality, baseline health characteristics, baseline earnings, self-employment status, union membership, and year of the index event. Data analysis occurred from March 2019 to December 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Changes in employment status and annual earnings, compared with unexposed control participants, were evaluated in the third calendar year after injury. Weighted multivariable probit regression was used to compare proportions of individuals working between those who survived trauma and control participants. The association of injury with mean yearly earnings was quantified using matched difference-in-difference, ordinary least-squares regression. Results: A total of 5167 adults (25.6% female; mean [SD] age, 47.3 [8.8] years) with severe injuries were matched with control participants who were unexposed (25.6% female; mean [SD] age, 47.3 [8.8] years). Three years after trauma, 79.3% of those who survived trauma were working, compared with 91.7% of control participants, a difference of -12.4 (95% CI, -13.5 to -11.4) percentage points. Three years after injury, patients with injuries experienced a mean loss of $9745 (95% CI, -$10 739 to -$8752) in earnings compared with control participants, representing a 19.0% difference in annual earnings. Those who remained employed 3 years after injury experienced a 10.8% loss of earnings compared with control participants (-$6043 [95% CI, -$7101 to -$4986]). Loss of work was proportionately higher in those with lower preinjury income (lowest tercile, -18.5% [95% CI, -20.8% to -16.2%]; middle tercile, -11.5% [95% CI, -13.2% to -9.9%]; highest tercile, -6.0% (95% CI, -7.8% to -4.3%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, severe traumatic injury had a significant association with employment and earnings of adults of working age. Those with lower preinjury earnings experienced the greatest relative loss of employment and earnings.

External Validation of a Population-Based Prediction Model for High Healthcare Resource Use in Adults.

Predicting high healthcare resource users is important for informing prevention strategies and healthcare decision-making. We aimed to cross-provincially validate the High Resource User Population Risk Tool (HRUPoRT), a predictive model that uses population survey data to estimate 5 year risk of becoming a high healthcare resource user. The model, originally derived and validated in Ontario, Canada, was applied to an external validation cohort. HRUPoRT model predictors included chronic conditions, socio-demographics, and health behavioural risk factors. The cohort consisted of 10,504 adults (≥18 years old) from the Canadian Community Health Survey in Manitoba, Canada (cycles 2007/08 and 2009/10). A person-centred costing algorithm was applied to linked health administrative databases to determine respondents' healthcare utilization over 5 years. Model fit was assessed using the c-statistic for discrimination and calibration plots. In the external validation cohort, HRUPoRT demonstrated strong discrimination (c statistic = 0.83) and was well calibrated across the range of risk. HRUPoRT performed well in an external validation cohort, demonstrating transportability of the model in other jurisdictions. HRUPoRT's use of population survey data enables a health equity focus to assist with decision-making on prevention of high healthcare resource use.

Differences in coronary artery disease complexity and associations with mortality and hospital admissions among First Nations and non-First Nations patients undergoing angiography: a comparative retrospective matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: First Nations people are more likely than the general population to experience long-term adverse health outcomes after coronary angiography. Our aim was to quantify the extent of coronary artery disease among First Nations and non-First Nations patients undergoing angiography to investigate differences in coronary artery disease and related health disparities. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective matched cohort study to compare health outcomes of First Nations and non-First Nations adult patients (> 18 yr) who underwent index angiography between Apr. 1, 2008, and Mar. 31, 2012, in Manitoba, Canada. The SYNTAX Score was used to measure and compare severity of coronary artery disease between groups. Primary outcomes of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were compared between groups using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted by SYNTAX Score results and weighted by the inverse probability of being First Nations. Secondary outcomes included all-cause and cardiovascular-related hospital admissions. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 277 matched pairs of First Nations and non-First Nations patients undergoing angiography; the average age of patients was 56.0 (standard deviation 11.7) years. The median SYNTAX Score results and patient distributions across categories in the matched paired cohort groups were not significantly different. Although proportionally First Nations patients showed worse health outcomes, mortality risks were similar in the weighted sample, even after controlling for revascularization and SYNTAX Score results. Secondary outcomes showed that adjusted risks for hospital admission for acute myocardial infarction (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 3.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-6.55) and for congestive heart failure (adjusted HR 3.84, 95% CI 1.37-10.78) were significantly higher among First Nations patients in the weighted sample. INTERPRETATION: The extent of coronary artery disease among matched cohort groups of First Nations and non-First Nations patients appears similar, and controlling for baseline sociodemographic characteristics, coronary artery disease risk factors and SYNTAX Score results explained higher mortality risk and most hospital admissions among First Nations patients. Although there is a need to decrease risk factors for coronary artery disease among First Nations populations, addressing individuals' behaviour without considering root causes underlying risk factors for coronary artery disease will fail to decrease health outcome disparities among First Nations patients undergoing angiography.

Effects of Cardiovascular Health Shocks on Spouses' Work and Earnings: A National Study.

BACKGROUND: Acute health shocks can reduce the ability to work and earn among working-age survivors. The full economic impact includes labor market effects on spouses/partners, but there is a knowledge gap in this area. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess how 3 common health shocks, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiac arrest, influence work and earnings of spouses aged 35-61 years. RESEARCH DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study of case and control couples used population-based, linked Canadian income tax and hospitalization data from 2005 to 2013. SUBJECTS: Case couples comprised 1 partner aged 41-61 years who experienced a health shock in the index year and survived 3 years hence, and a working-age partner. Control couples were matched up to 5:1 on 12 characteristics, with neither experiencing the health shock of interest in the index year. MEASURES: Primary outcome was the change in spousal annual earnings between the year prior and 3 years after the event. Pre-to-post spousal income changes were categorized into 9 levels and compared between case spouses and control spouses by the Pearson χ test. RESULTS: There were 11,208 matched case couples for acute myocardial infarction, 622 for cardiac arrest, and 2288 for stroke. Overall, case and control spouses experienced similar distributional changes in preevent to postevent earning (all P≥0.27). Heterogeneity analysis indicated that spouses of more severe stroke sufferers ceased working at a higher rate than for control spouses. CONCLUSION: Beyond assessing average values, detailed analysis of changes in spousal earnings after common cardiovascular health shocks did not demonstrate effects attributable to those health shocks.

Disparities in management and outcomes of myocardial infarction in multiple sclerosis: A matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Although multiple sclerosis (MS) confers an elevated risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), little is known about how it influences management of AMI. METHODS: Using population-based administrative (health) data from two Canadian provinces, we conducted a retrospective matched cohort study. We identified people with MS who had an incident AMI, and up to five AMI controls without MS matched on age, sex, and region. We compared the likelihood of undergoing cardiac catheterization within 30 days of AMI, time to revascularization, use of recommended pharmacotherapy post-AMI, and mortality at 30 and 365 days post-AMI using multivariable regression models adjusting for potential confounders. We pooled findings across provinces using meta-analysis. RESULTS: We identified 559 MS cases and 2523 matched controls. In the matched cohort, the MS cohort was less likely to undergo cardiac catheterization within 30 days of admission (odds ratio (OR) = 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.49-0.77), revascularization (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.69-0.88), or to fill a prescription for recommended therapy. Mortality risk was higher in the MS cohort than in the matched cohort at 30 and 365 days post-AMI. CONCLUSION: Rates of diagnostic and therapeutic care, and survival after AMI were lower in the MS population than in a matched population.

Examining mechanisms for gender differences in admission to intensive care units.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the male predominance of older people admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) is due to gender differences in the presence of spouses, partners, or children; rates of gender-specific disease; or triage decisions made by health system personnel. DATA SOURCES AND COLLECTION: Three population-based datasets, 2004-2012, of Canadians ≥65 years: provincial health care data from Manitoba (n = 250 190) and national data of nursing home residents (n = 133 982) and community-based homecare recipients (n = 210 090). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational study, using multivariable Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Males predominated in ICU admissions: from Manitoba (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.80-1.95), nursing homes (HR = 1.47, 1.35-1.60), and homecare (odds ratio = 1.14, 1.11-1.17). Adjustment for spouses, partners, and children did not attenuate this effect. The HR for gender was lower by 13.5 percent, relative, after excluding ICU care for cardiac causes. Male predominance was not present during a second ICU admission among survivors of a first ICU-containing hospitalization (HR = 1.07, 0.96-1.20). CONCLUSIONS: In three older cohorts, the male predominance of ICU admission was not explained by gender differences in the presence of a spouse, partner, or children, or cardiac disease rates. The third finding suggests that triage bias is unlikely to be responsible for the male predominance.

Cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis and outcomes among Manitoba First Nations people living on and off reserve: a retrospective population-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: Substantial cancer-related disparities exist between First Nations and non-Indigenous Canadians. The objectives of this study were to compare cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis and mortality outcomes between Status First Nations people living on reserve and off reserve in Manitoba. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of population-level administrative health databases in Manitoba. Cancers diagnosed between Apr. 1, 2004, and Mar. 31, 2011, were linked with the Indian Registry System and 5 provincial databases. We compared differences in baseline characteristics, cancer incidence, site and stage at diagnosis between Status First Nations patients living on and off reserve. Linear regression models examined trends in annual cancer incidence. Cox proportional hazard regression models examined mortality. RESULTS: There were 1524 newly diagnosed cancers among Status First Nations people in Manitoba between Apr. 1, 2004, and Mar. 31, 2011. First Nations people living on reserve were significantly older than those living off reserve (p < 0.001) and had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores at diagnosis (p = 0.01). A lower proportion of on-reserve patients than off-reserve patients were diagnosed with stage I cancers (21.7% v. 26.9%, p = 0.02). There were no differences in annual cancer incidence between groups. The adjusted incidence of cancer over the combined study years was higher in the off-reserve group than in the on-reserve group (287.9 v. 247.9 per 100 000, p = 0.02). No significant differences in mortality were found. INTERPRETATION: The lower proportion of on-reserve patients diagnosed with cancer at stage I is concerning, as it suggests less access to screening services or delays in diagnosis. Further research is needed to understand patterns in diagnosis and differences in cancer site and overall cancer incidence between First Nations people living on and off reserve.

Comparing cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis and outcomes of First Nations and all other Manitobans: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Globally, epidemiological evidence suggests cancer incidence and outcomes among Indigenous peoples are a growing concern. Although historically cancer among First Nations (FN) peoples in Canada was relatively unknown, recent epidemiological evidence reveals a widening of cancer related disparities. However evidence at the population level is limited. The aim of this study was to explore cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, and outcomes among status FN peoples in comparison with all other Manitobans (AOM). METHODS: All cancers diagnosed between April 1, 2004 and March 31, 2011 were linked with the Indian Registry System and five provincial healthcare databases to compare differences in characteristics, cancer incidence, and stage at diagnosis and mortality of the FN and AOM cohorts. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to examine mortality. RESULTS: The FN cohort was significantly younger, with higher comorbidities than AOM. A higher proportion of FN people were diagnosed with cancer at stages III (18.7% vs. 15.4%) and IV (22.4% vs. 19.9%). Cancer incidence was significantly lower in the FN cohort, however, there were no significant differences between the two cohorts after adjusting for age, sex, income and area of residence. No significant trends in cancer incidence were identified in either cohort over time. Mortality was generally higher in the FN cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar cancer incidence, FN peoples in Manitoba experience poorer survival. The underlying causes of these disparities are not yet understood, particularly in relation to the impact of colonization and other determinants of health.

Cardiovascular Medication Use and Long-Term Outcomes of First Nations and Non-First Nations Patients Following Diagnostic Angiography: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background In Canada, First Nations (FN) people are at greater risk of mortality than the general population following index angiography. This disparity has not been investigated while considering guideline-recommended cardiovascular medication use. Methods and Results Retrospective analysis of administrative health data investigated patterns of medication dispensation during the first year after index angiography among patients in Manitoba, Canada. Medication possession ratios (MPRs) reflecting the percentage of days in which medications were supplied were calculated separately for ß-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, statins, and antiplatelets (clopidogrel). Patients were assigned to 1 of 4 categories: (1) not dispensed (0% MPR), (2) low (1-39% MPR), (3) intermediate (40-79% MPR), (4) high (≥80% MPR). Cox regression models that adjusted for MPR categories were used to explore the association between FN patients and both 5-year all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. FN patients were less likely to have an intermediate MPR (odds ratio: 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-0.99) or a high MPR (odds ratio: 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50-0.81) for statin medications than non-FN patients. FN patients also had higher adjusted risks of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality than non-FN patients (hazard ratio, all-cause: 1.54 [95% CI, 1.25-1.89]; cardiovascular: 1.62 [95% CI, 1.16-2.25]). Conclusions FN status was independently associated with intermediate and high MPRs for statins during the first year following index angiography among patients with known ischemic heart disease. Differences in MPR categories did not explain the disparity in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality between the 2 populations. Reduction of cardiovascular disparities may be best addressed using primary prevention strategies that include decolonizing policies and practices.

Traditional risk factors may not explain increased incidence of myocardial infarction in MS.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of incident acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the multiple sclerosis (MS) population and a matched population without MS, controlling for traditional vascular risk factors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective matched cohort study using population-based administrative (health claims) data in 2 Canadian provinces, British Columbia and Manitoba. We identified incident MS cases using a validated case definition. For each case, we identified up to 5 controls without MS matched on age, sex, and region. We compared the incidence of AMI between cohorts using incidence rate ratios (IRR). We used Cox proportional hazards regression to compare the hazard of AMI between cohorts adjusting for sociodemographic factors, diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. We pooled the provincial findings using meta-analysis. RESULTS: We identified 14,565 persons with MS and 72,825 matched controls. The crude incidence of AMI per 100,000 population was 146.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 129.0-163.5) in the MS population and 128.8 (95% CI 121.8-135.8) in the matched population. After age standardization, the incidence of AMI was higher in the MS population than in the matched population (IRR 1.18; 95% CI 1.03-1.36). After adjustment, the hazard of AMI was 60% higher in the MS population than in the matched population (hazard ratio 1.63; 95% CI 1.43-1.87). CONCLUSION: The risk of AMI is elevated in MS, and this risk may not be accounted for by traditional vascular risk factors.

Effects of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular health events on work and earnings: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Survivors of acute health events can experience lasting reductions in functional status and quality of life, as well as reduced ability to work and earn income. We aimed to assess the effect of acute myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac arrest and stroke on work and earning among working-age people. METHODS: For this retrospective cohort study, we used the Canadian Hospitalization and Taxation Database, which contains linked hospital and income tax data, from 2005 to 2013 to perform difference-in-difference analyses. We matched patients admitted to hospital for acute MI, cardiac arrest or stroke with controls who were not admitted to hospital for these indications. Participants were aged 40-61 years, worked in the 2 years before the event and were alive 3 years after the event. Patients were matched to controls for 11 variables. The primary outcome was working status 3 years postevent. We also assessed earnings change attributable to the event. We matched 19 129 particpants who were admitted to hospital with acute MI, 1043 with cardiac arrest and 4395 with stroke to 1 820 644, 307 375 and 888 481 controls, respectively. RESULTS: Fewer of the patients who were admitted to hospital were working 3 years postevent than controls for acute MI (by 5.0 percentage points [pp], 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.5-5.5), cardiac arrest (by 12.9 pp, 95% CI 10.4-15.3) and stroke (by 19.8 pp, 95% CI 18.5-23.5). Mean (95% CI) earnings declines attributable to the events were $3834 (95% CI 3346-4323) for acute MI, $11 143 (95% CI 8962-13 324) for cardiac arrest, and $13 278 (95% CI 12 301-14 255) for stroke. The effects on income were greater for patients who had lower baseline earnings, comorbid disease, longer hospital length of stay or needed mechanical ventilation. Sex, marital status or self-employment status did not affect income declines. INTERPRETATION: Acute MI, cardiac arrest and stroke all resulted in substantial loss in employment and earnings that persisted for at least 3 years after the events. These outcomes have consequences for patients, families, employers and governments. Identification of subgroups at high risk for these losses may assist in targeting interventions, policies and legislation to promote return to work.

Health Outcome and Follow-up Care Differences Between First Nation and Non-First Nation Coronary Angiogram Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: First Nations (FN) people experience high rates of ischemic heart disease (IHD) morbidity and mortality. Increasing access to angiography may lead to improved outcomes. We compared various outcomes and follow-up care post-index angiography between FN and non-FN patients. METHODS: All index angiography patients in Manitoba were identified between April 1, 2000 and March 31, 2009 and categorized into acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or non-AMI groups based on whether their angiogram occurred within 7 days of an AMI. Cox proportional hazard models estimated associations between FN status and outcomes related to mortality, subsequent hospitalizations, revascularizations, and physician visits. RESULTS: Cardiovascular mortality was higher among FN patients in the non-AMI group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.94) and in the AMI group (HR = 1.57, 95% CI, 1.05-2.35). FN patients were also more likely to have a subsequent hospitalization for AMI (HR = 2.26, 95% CI, 1.79-2.85) in the non-AMI group. FN patients in the non-AMI group were less likely to receive percutaneous coronary intervention (HR = 0.85, 95% CI, 0.73-0.99) and more likely to undergo coronary artery bypass graft (HR = 1.26, 95% CI, 1.10-1.45). FN patients in both groups were less likely to visit a cardiologist/cardiac surgeon, internal medicine specialist, or family physician within 3 months and 1 year of angiography. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular health and follow-up care outcomes of FN and non-FN patients who undergo angiography are not the same. Addressing Indigenous determinants of health are necessary to improve cardiovascular outcomes.

Index coronary angiography use in Manitoba, Canada: a population-level descriptive analysis of First Nations and non-First Nations recipients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate recipient characteristics and rates of index angiography among First Nations (FN) and non-FN populations in Manitoba, Canada. SETTING: Population-based, secondary analysis of provincial administrative health data. PARTICIPANTS: All adults 18 years or older who received an index angiogram between 2000/2001 and 2008/2009. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Descriptive statistics for age, sex, income quintile by rural and urban residency and Charlson Comorbidity Index for FN and non-FN recipients. (2) Annual index angiogram rates for FN and non-FN populations and among those rates of 'urgent' angiograms based on acute myocardial infarction (AMI)-related hospitalisations during the previous 7 days. (3) Proportions of people who did not receive an angiogram in the 20 years preceding an ischaemic heart disease (IHD) diagnosis or a cardiovascular death; stratified by age (<65 or ≥65 years old). RESULTS: FN recipients were younger (56.3vs63.8 years; p<0.0001) and had higher Charlson Comorbidity scores (1.32vs0.78; p<0.001). During all years examined, index angiography rates were lower among FN people (2.67vs3.33 per 1000 population per year; p<0.001) with no notable temporal trends. Among the index angiogram recipients, a higher proportion was associated with an AMI-related hospitalisation in the FN group (28.8%vs25.0%; p<0.01) and in both groups rates significantly increased over time. FN people who died from cardiovascular disease or were older (65+years old) diagnosed with IHD were more likely to have received an angiogram in the preceding 20-30 years (17.8%vs12.5%; p<0.01 and 50.9%vs49.5%; p<0.03, respectively). FN people diagnosed with IHD who were under the age of 65 were less likely to have received an angiogram (47.8%vs53.1%; p<0.01) CONCLUSIONS: Index angiogram use differences are suggested between FN and non-FN populations, which may contribute to reported IHD disparities. Investigating factors driving these rates will determine any association between ethnicity and angiography services.

Advancing Prenatal Detection of Congenital Heart Disease: A Novel Screening Protocol Improves Early Diagnosis of Complex Congenital Heart Disease.

OBJECTIVES: Prenatal diagnosis of complex congenital heart disease (CHD) during routine obstetric ultrasound (US) examinations improves postnatal outcomes, but sensitivity is low (<40%). Our objective was to improve our prenatal detection of complex CHD with implementation of a specific screening protocol. METHODS: From January 2003 to December 2013, 506 consecutive confirmed cases of complex CHD in the province of Manitoba, Canada, were analyzed to compare the sensitivity and positive predictive value of prenatal US detection of complex CHD before and after the introduction of a novel prenatal screening protocol. The intervention was done in October 2004, emphasizing screening and not diagnosis of complex CHD. It involved education, practical scanning tips, a checklist, and feedback on cases. We also assessed the effect of the intervention in different screening settings: community hospitals, tertiary hospitals, and fetal assessment units. RESULTS: The sensitivity for detecting complex CHD increased from 29.8% to 88.3% (P < .0001), while the positive predictive value remained high. The largest improvement in detection was found for US units in community hospitals (52.4% higher; P < .0001), followed by tertiary hospitals (39.9%; P = .0004), and fetal assessment units (7.2%; P = .16). Additionally, there was a significant decrease in the presentation of neonates in critical condition from before to after the implementation (24.3% to 13.1%, respectively; P = .0165). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a focused routine prenatal screening protocol can vastly improve detection rates of critical cardiac abnormalities. The improvement in community hospitals was particularly important because early detection ensured that the birth was planned to take place in an appropriate facility. Our novel protocol can be performed by all sonographers, regardless of experience, equipment used, and hospital setting.

Systematic review of preoperative physical activity and its impact on postcardiac surgical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was to study the impact of preoperative physical activity levels on adult cardiac surgical patients' postoperative: (1) major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), (2) adverse events within 30 days, (3) hospital length of stay (HLOS), (4) intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), (5) activities of daily living (ADLs), (6) quality of life, (7) cardiac rehabilitation attendance and (8) physical activity behaviour. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, AgeLine and Cochrane library for cohort studies was conducted. RESULTS: Eleven studies (n=5733 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Only self-reported physical activity tools were used. Few studies used multivariate analyses to compare active versus inactive patients prior to surgery. When comparing patients who were active versus inactive preoperatively, there were mixed findings for MACCE, 30 day adverse events, HLOS and ICU LOS. Of the studies that adjusted for confounding variables, five studies found a protective, independent association between physical activity and MACCE (n=1), 30-day postoperative events (n=2), HLOS (n=1) and ICU LOS (n=1), but two studies found no protective association for 30-day postoperative events (n=1) and postoperative ADLs (n=1). No studies investigated if activity status before surgery impacted quality of life or cardiac rehabilitation attendance postoperatively. Three studies found that active patients prior to surgery were more likely to be inactive postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Due to the mixed findings, the literature does not presently support that self-reported preoperative physical activity behaviour is associated with postoperative cardiac surgical outcomes. Future studies should objectively measure physical activity, clearly define outcomes and adjust for clinically relevant variables. REGISTRATION: Trial registration number NCT02219815. PROSPERO number CRD42015023606.

Outcomes of an investment in administrative data infrastructure: An example of capacity building at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy.

Using the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy as an example, this commentary discusses how even small investments in population health data can create a multitude of research benefits. The authors highlight that through infrastructure development such as acquiring databases, facilitating access to data and developing data management practices, new, innovative research can be achieved at relatively low cost.

A Population-based Study of Intensive Care Unit Admissions in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the incidence of and mortality after critical illness in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared with the general population, and to describe the risks for and characteristics of critical illness in patients with RA. METHODS: We used population-based administrative data from the Data Repository at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy from 1984 to 2010, and linked clinical data from an intensive care unit (ICU) database to identify all persons with RA in the province requiring ICU admission. We identified a population-based control group, matched by age, sex, socioeconomic status, and region of residence. The incidence of ICU admission, reasons for, and mortality after ICU admission were compared between populations using age- and sex-standardized rates, rate ratios, Cox proportional hazards models, and logistic regression models. RESULTS: We identified 10,078 prevalent and 5560 incident cases of RA. After adjustment, the risk for ICU admission was higher for RA (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.50-1.83) versus the matched general population. From 2000-2010, the annual incidence of ICU admission among prevalent patients was about 1% in RA, with a crude 10-year incidence of 8%. Compared with the general population admitted to ICU, 1 year after ICU admission, mortality was increased by 40% in RA. Cardiovascular disorders were the most common reason for ICU admission in RA. CONCLUSION: Patients with RA have a higher risk for admission to the ICU than the general population and increased mortality 1 year after admission. Even with advances in management, RA remains a serious disease with significant morbidity.