[High versus moderate intense running exercise - effects on cardiometabolic risk-factors in untrained males]. / Hoch- versus moderat-intensive Laufbelastung - Einfluss auf kardio-metabolische Risikogrößen bei untrainierten Männern.

Introduction | The philosophy on how to improve cardiometabolic risk factors most efficiently by endurance exercise is still controversial. To determine the effect of high-intensity (interval) training (HI[I]T) vs. moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE) training on cardiometabolic risk factors we conducted a 16-week crossover randomized controlled trial. Methods | 81 healthy untrained middle aged men were randomly assigned to a HI(I)T-group and a control-group that started the MICE running program after their control status. HI(I)T consisted of running exercise around or above the individual anaerobic threshold (≈ 80- 100 % HRmax); MICE focused on continuous running exercise at ≈ 65-77.5 % HRmax. Both protocols were comparable with respect to energy consumption. Study endpoints were cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), metabolic syndrome Z-score (MetS-Z-score), intima-media-thickness (IMT) and body composition. Results | VO2max-changes in this overweighed male cohort significantly (p=0.002) differ between HIIT (14.7 ± 9.3 %, p=0.001) and MICE (7.9 ± 7.4 %,p=0.001). LVMI, as determined via magnetic resonance imaging, significantly increased in both exercise groups (HIIT: 8.5 ± 5.4 %, p=0.001 vs. MICE: 5.3 ± 4.0 %, p=0.001), however the change was significantly more pronounced (p=0.005) in the HIIT-group. MetS-Z-score (HIIT: -2.06 ± 1.31, p=0.001 vs. MICE: -1.60 ± 1.77, p=0.001) and IMT (4.6 ± 5.9 % p=0.011 vs. 4.4 ± 8.1 %, p=0.019) did not show significant group-differences. Reductions of fat mass (-4.9 ± 9.0 %, p=0.010 vs. -9.5 ± 9.4, p=0.001) were significantly higher among the MICE-participants (p=0.034), however, the same was true (p=0.008) for lean body mass (0.5 ± 2.3 %, p=0.381 vs. -1.3 ± 2.0 %, p=0.003). Conclusion | In summary high-intensity interval training tends to impact cardiometabolic health more favorable compared with a moderate-intensity continuous endurance exercise protocol.

Differences in treatment and outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals with compared to without departments of cardiology; results from the pooled data of the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA 1+2) Registries and the Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR).

AIMS: The specialty of the admitting physician may influence treatment and outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The pooled data of three German acute myocardial infarction registries: the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) 1+2 studies and the Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR) were analysed. Patients admitted to hospitals with departments of cardiology were compared to hospitals without such departments. A total of 24 814 acute myocardial infarction patients were included, 9020 (36%) patients at 91 (29.8%) hospitals with departments of cardiology and 15 794 (64%) at 214 (70.2%) hospitals without cardiology departments. There were only minor differences in patient characteristics and prevalence of concomitant diseases between the two types of hospital. The first electrocardiogram was more often diagnostic at hospitals with cardiology departments (71.8% vs 66.5%, P<0.001). Reperfusion therapy and adjunctive medical therapy, such as aspirin, beta-blockers and ACE-inhibitors were used more often at cardiology departments (all P -values <0.001), even after adjustment for confounding parameters. Treatment improved at both types of hospital over time. Admission to a hospital with a department of cardiology was independently associated with a lower hospital mortality (14.2% vs 15.4%, adjusted OR=0.91; 95%CI: 0.83-0.99). Additional logistic regression models showed that the higher use of reperfusion therapy and recommended concomitant medical therapy was responsible for most of the survival benefit at such hospitals. CONCLUSION: Treatment of acute myocardial infarction patients at hospitals with departments of cardiology was independently associated with a higher use of recommended therapy and a lower hospital mortality compared to hospitals without such departments.

[Distribution of lymph nodes and lymph node metastases in esophageal carcinoma]. / Verteilung von Lymphknoten und Lymphknotenmetastasen beim Osophaguskarzinom.

BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastases are an independent prognostic factor in esophageal cancer. Accurate pathologic work up depends on detailed knowledges of number and anatomic distribution of lymph nodes and metastases. Factors that may determinate metastatic spread are also important. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-six patients with esophageal cancer were included in this study. Number and localization of nodes and metastases were documented and correlated with localization, infiltration deepness and grade of malignancy of the tumor. The effectivity of the search for nodes and metastases was also studied. RESULTS: We found 3869 lymph nodes containing 338 metastases in the 156 specimens (median 25 and 2). 53.2% of the cases exhibited metastases and 15.4% contained only solitary metastasis. The minimal number of lymph nodes for excluding of metastasis was about six nodes. Most of the nodes were found at lower esophagus and on the oral stomach resection. Tumors of the middle and upper thoracal esophagus spread also frequently to the nodes along the lesser curvature of the stomach. Between infiltration deepness and grade of malignancy of the tumors a positive association was found. CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node metastases are a frequent pathological feature in esophageal cancer which depends on infiltration deepness and grade of malignancy of the tumor. This allows the estimation of metastatic spread. For staging a minimum of six nodes must be found in the specimen. In this context the frequent metastases along the lesser curvature of the stomach must be considered.