Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Surg Endosc ; 34(10): 4298-4304, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31650238

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Floppy pouch complex (FPC) consists of disease phenotypes in patients with ileal pouches, including pouch prolapse, afferent limb syndrome, enterocele, redundant loop, and pouch folding. Our recent study demonstrated that lower body weight, lower peripouch fat, family history of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), female gender, and dyschezia are risk factors for FPC patients with IBD. The aims of this study were to assess the relationship between pouch wall thickness and FPC, and to investigate the association between inflamed and non-inflamed pouch wall thickness. METHODS: This case-control study included all eligible patients with FPC from our prospectively maintained, IRB-approved Pouchitis Registry from 2011 to 2017. We measured pouch wall thickness of fully distended pouches on cross-sectional abdominal and pelvic imaging. Patients with stoma and non-distended pouches were completely excluded. Risk factors for FPC were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 140 out of 451 patients from our were found to have fully distended pouches on imaging. Of the 140 patients, 36 (25.7%) were diagnosed as having FPC. We analyzed pouch wall thickness for each subcategory of FPC as well as non-FPC conditions. The thickness of pouch wall was follows: pouch prolapse (N = 19): 1.5 mm (1.5-2.0), afferent limb syndrome (N = 12): 1.5 mm (1.1-2.0), folded pouch (N = 4): 1.5 mm (1.1-1.9), and redundant pouch (N = 2): 1.3 mm (1.0-1.3). The control group (N = 104) consisting of normal pouch, pouchitis, cuffitis, Crohn's disease of the pouch, and pouch sinus with median pouch wall thickness of 1.5 mm, 2.3 mm, 2.0 mm, 2.0 mm, and 1.5 mm, respectively. There were significant differences in pouch wall thickness between normal or non-inflamed pouch versus pouchitis versus cuffitis versus Crohn's disease of the pouch with p values of 0.01, 0.04, 0.05, and 0.049, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with FPC were shown to have thin pouch wall, which those with inflammatory conditions of the pouch tended to have thick pouch wall. These findings will have implications in both diagnosis and investigation of etiopathogenesis of these disorders.


Assuntos
Bolsas Cólicas/patologia , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Inflamação/patologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Fatores de Risco
2.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 34(6): 1061-1067, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30972491

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis can be associated with a variety of complications, including floppy pouch complex (FPC). FPC is defined as the presence of pouch prolapse, afferent limb syndrome, enterocele, redundant loop, and folding pouch on pouchoscopy or contrasted pouchogram. The main symptoms of patients with FPC are dyschezia, incomplete evacuation, and bloating. The aims of the study were to evaluate the relative frequency of each disorder of FPC and to characterize its risk factors. METHODS: This case-control study included all eligible patients with FPC from our prospectively maintained, IRB-approved Pouchitis Registry from 2011 to 2017. The control group included the patients without any of the above conditions. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 437 eligible patients were analyzed including 97 (22.2%) with FPC and 340 (77.8%) without FPC, 188 (43.0%) being female, 360 (82.4%) being Caucasians, and 66 (15.1%) having a family history of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). There were 427 patients (97.7%) having J pouches and 10 (2.2%) having S pouches and the median duration from pouch construction to data sensor was 6.0 years (interquartile range 0.962-1.020). In the whole cohort, 64 (66.0%) patients had pouch prolapse, 38 (39.2%) patients had afferent limb syndrome, 10/42 (23.8%) patients had redundant loop, and 3/42 (7.1%) had folding pouch. In multivariable analysis, lower body weight (odds ratio [OR] 0.944; interquartile range; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.913-0.976, P = 0.001) and the presence of family history of IBD (OR 4.098; 95% CI 1.301-12.905, P = 0.013) were associated with a higher risk of FPC. CONCLUSION: We found that pouch prolapse and afferent limb syndrome are the most common forms of FPC. A lower body weight as well as family history of IBD was found to be risk factors for FPC. The findings will have implications in both diagnosis and investigation of etiopathogenesis of this group of challenging disorders.


Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa/complicações , Bolsas Cólicas , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Prolapso , Fatores de Risco
3.
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) ; 14(10): 571-576, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30846911

RESUMO

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the gold-standard surgical procedure for familial adenomatous polyposis, refractory ulcerative colitis, and colitis- associated dysplasia requiring colectomy. Numerous adverse sequelae are associated with J-pouch surgery, including anastomotic leak, stricture, and fistula formation, among other complications. Pouch failure due to structural, inflammatory, or functional complications represents a challenge to both physicians and patients. Symptom assessment should be combined with endoscopic, histologic, and radiographic examinations to make an accurate diagnosis of J-pouch-related complications.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA