Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Respir Med ; 87(4): 303-8, 1993 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9728232

RESUMO

The value of pernasal swabs and direct adenoid swabs in chronic adenoid and adenotonsillar disease was assessed in 175 patients. Prior to adenoidectomy (53 patients) or adenotonsillectomy (122 patients), pernasal and direct adenoid swabs were taken. Adenoid currettings and tonsil tissue were cultured. Haemophilus influenzae was the bacterium most frequently isolated from adenoid currettings and from the centre (core) of the resected tonsil. There was a close relationship between the bacteriology of the pernasal swab and the adenoid tissue and tonsil core in 72 and 71% of patients, respectively. There was an identical profile of pathogens in 52 and 49%, respectively. We suggest that in children with adenoiditis or adenotonsillitis and hypertrophy of the adenoid, a pernasal swab should be used in preference to a throat swab in selecting appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Penicillin and ampicillin are not appropriate blind therapy in chronic adenoid and adenotonsillar infections because of the prevalence of beta-lactamase-producing aerobes (40%) in adenoid and tonsil core in these conditions.


Assuntos
Tonsila Faríngea/microbiologia , Tonsila Palatina/microbiologia , Adenoidectomia , Adolescente , Ampicilina , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Doença Crônica , Contraindicações , Técnicas de Cultura , Feminino , Infecções por Haemophilus/diagnóstico , Haemophilus influenzae/enzimologia , Haemophilus influenzae/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Hipertrofia , Masculino , Nariz/microbiologia , Penicilinas , Faringe/microbiologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Tonsilectomia , Tonsilite/tratamento farmacológico , Tonsilite/microbiologia , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo
2.
J Neurosurg ; 63(5): 704-13, 1985 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3903070

RESUMO

A multi-center double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted by the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study Group to examine the efficacy of high-dose methylprednisolone (1000-mg bolus and 1000 mg daily thereafter for 10 days) compared with that of a standard dose (100-mg bolus and 100 mg daily for 10 days). No significant difference was observed in neurological recovery of motor function, pinprick response, or touch sensation 1 year after injury between the two treatment groups, after adjustment for other potentially confounding factors. Analyses that specifically took into account the patients' total steroid dose and relative weight confirmed the lack of a steroid treatment effect. The case fatality rate was 10.7% during the 1st year after injury, and this was not associated with the steroid treatment protocol or the patient's gender. Deaths did occur significantly more frequently among patients who were completely (15.3%) and partially (8.6%) plegic than among those who were paretic (2.5%, p = 0.0005), and among patients aged 50 years or older (38.6%, p = 0.0001).


Assuntos
Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Metilprednisolona/administração & dosagem , Movimento , Exame Neurológico , Paralisia/tratamento farmacológico , Paralisia/fisiopatologia , Distribuição Aleatória , Sensação , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/mortalidade , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/fisiopatologia , Tato
3.
JAMA ; 251(1): 45-52, 1984 Jan 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6361287

RESUMO

A multicenter double-blind randomized trial was conducted to examine the efficacy of a high dose of methylprednisolone (1,000-mg bolus and daily thereafter for ten days) compared with a standard dose (100-mg bolus and daily thereafter for ten days) in 330 patients with acute spinal cord injury. No difference in neurological recovery of motor function or pinprick and light touch sensation was observed between the two treatment groups six weeks and six months after injury. The lack of a treatment effect was independent of the severity of the initial lesion or the time from injury to starting treatment. Although not statistically significant, early case fatality was greater in the high-dose protocol (relative risk of 3.1 and 1.9, less than or equal to 14 and 15 to 28 days after injury, respectively) but not from 29 to 210 days after injury. Wound infections of both trauma and operative sites were more prevalent in the high-dose regimen (relative risk of 3.6).


Assuntos
Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Metilprednisolona/administração & dosagem , Metilprednisolona/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Distribuição Aleatória , Risco , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/mortalidade , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Fatores de Tempo , Infecção dos Ferimentos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA