Mismatch repair protein status of non-neoplastic uterine and intestinal mucosa in patients with Lynch syndrome and double somatic mismatch repair protein mutations.

Mismatch repair (MMR) protein-deficient non-neoplastic colonic crypts and endometrial glands (dMMR crypts and glands) have been reported as a unique marker of underlying Lynch syndrome (LS). However, no large studies have directly compared the frequency of detection in cases with double somatic (DS) MMR mutations. We retrospectively analyzed 42 colonic resection specimens (24 LS and 18 DS) and 20 endometrial specimens (9 LS and 11 DS), including 19 hysterectomies and 1 biopsy for dMMR crypts and glands. All specimens were from patients with known primary cancers, including colonic adenocarcinomas and endometrial endometrioid carcinomas (including 2 mixed carcinomas). Four blocks of normal mucosa away from the tumor were selected from most cases, as available. MMR immunohistochemistry specific to the primary tumor mutations was analyzed. dMMR crypts were found in 65% of LS and 0% of DS MMR-mutated colonic adenocarcinomas (P < .001). Most dMMR crypts were detected in the colon (12 of 15) compared to the ileum (3 of 15). dMMR crypts showed single and grouped losses of MMR immunohistochemical expression. dMMR glands were found in 67% of LS and 9% (1 of 11) of DS endometrial cases (P = .017). Most dMMR glands were found in the uterine wall, with 1 LS and 1 DS case exhibiting dMMR glands in the lower uterine segment. Most cases exhibited multifocal and grouped dMMR glands. No morphologic atypia was identified in dMMR crypts or glands. Overall, we demonstrate that dMMR crypts and glands are highly associated with underlying LS, while being rarer in those with DS MMR mutations.

Pancreatic Frozen Section Guides Operative Management With Few Deferrals and Errors.

CONTEXT.­: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, and frozen section analysis is used to confirm diagnosis and determine resectability and margin status. OBJECTIVE.­: To evaluate use and accuracy of frozen section and how diagnosis impacts surgical procedure. DESIGN.­: We reviewed patients with planned pancreatic resections between January 2014 and March 2019 with at least 1 frozen section. Pathology reports including frozen sections, preoperative cytology, and operative notes were reviewed. Frozen sections were categorized by margin, primary pancreatic diagnosis, metastasis, or vascular resectability. The deferral and error rates and surgeons' response were noted. RESULTS.­: We identified 898 planned pancreatic resections and 221 frozen sections that were performed on 152 cases for 102 margins, 94 metastatic lesions, 20 primary diagnoses, and 5 to confirm vascular resectability. The diagnosis was deferred to permanent sections in 13 of 152 cases (8.6%) on 16 of 221 frozen sections (7.2%): 6 for metastasis, 8 for margins, and 2 for primary diagnosis. Discrepancies/errors were identified in 4 of 152 cases (2.6%) and 4 of 221 frozen sections (1.8%). Surgeons' responses were different than expected in 8 of 221 frozen sections (3.6%), but their actions were explained by other intraoperative findings in 6 of 8. CONCLUSIONS.­: Frozen section remains an important diagnostic tool used primarily for evaluation of margins and metastasis during pancreatectomy. In most cases, a definitive diagnosis is rendered, with occasional deferrals and few errors. Intraoperative findings explain most cases where surgeons act differently than expected based on frozen section diagnosis.

Assessment of isochromosome 12p and 12p abnormalities in germ cell tumors using fluorescence in situ hybridization, single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays, and next-generation sequencing/mate-pair sequencing.

The identification of isochromosome 12p [i(12p)] and 12p gains have significant clinical utility in the diagnosis of germ cell tumors (GCTs). We have summarized the results of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays to identify i(12p), performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-validated setting for 536 specimens. In addition, the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Project GENIE registry and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data sets were evaluated for chromosome 12p gains, and a limited number of cases were concurrently evaluated using FISH, single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays and next-generation sequencing (NGS; including mate-pair sequencing). Specimens submitted for FISH testing were frequently from potential sites of metastases (male: 70.9% and female: 69.3%), and polysomy of chromosome 12 with or without concurrent i(12p) was a frequent finding, seen in 3% (16/536) and 35% (186/536) of cases, respectively. Our analysis suggests that 12p gains are likely to be present in approximately 73% of male GCT and in 32% of female GCT (AACR GENIE, n = 555). When comparing TCGA cases of testicular GCT (n = 149) to combined cases of sarcoma, colorectal, prostate, and urothelial carcinoma (n = 1754), 12p gains had a sensitivity of 77.2% and specificity of 97.3% for GCT. Some advantages of FISH over SNP arrays/NGS include relatively lower cost, rapid turnaround time, the ability to analyze biopsy material with a limited number of tumor cells (50 cells), and the ability to distinguish i(12p) from polysomy. The ability to spatially restrict the analysis to cells of interest is critical, as specimens submitted for testing often have low tumor purity. Disadvantages include false negative results due to an inability to detect segmental gains due to FISH probe design. With the availability of numerous testing modalities, including FISH, SNP arrays, and NGS-based assays, a nuanced understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of each methodology, as has been presented in this study, may inform appropriate testing strategies.

ESR1 genetic alterations and their association with clinicopathologic characteristics in advanced breast cancer: a single academic institution experience.

Estrogen receptor (ER) alpha, a ligand-dependent nuclear transcription factor encoded by the ESR1 gene, is expressed in 70% of breast carcinomas (BCs) and is used as a target for endocrine-based therapies. However, some patients develop resistance to endocrine-based therapies due to ESR1 mutation, which leads to constitutive activation in the absence of ligand. We retrospectively analyzed 223 clinically advanced BCs using the FoundationOne CDX assay and found 13.9% (31/223) of cases had ESR1 genetic alterations (26 mutations and 5 amplifications). All ESR1 mutations occurred within the ligand binding domain, with the most prevalent being Y537S (42.3%) and D538G (38.5%), and all ESR1-mutated cases had a history of aromatase inhibitor use. No significant difference in clinicopathologic features was identified between ESR1-mutated and ESR1-amplified cases except higher frequency of HER2 positivity and TP53 mutations in ESR1-amplified cases. The prevalence of ESR1 mutations in ER-positive BCs was 19.1% (26/136). In comparison to ESR1-nonmutated ER-positive cases, ESR1-mutated cases demonstrated significantly higher percentage of tumor cells with ER and progesterone receptor expression, an increased tendency for overall distant metastasis and liver metastasis, higher frequency of FGF3/4/19 mutations, lower frequency of TP53 mutation, but no difference in overall survival and metastatic/recurrent intervals. In conclusion, our findings suggest that development of ESR1 mutations are selected for under the influence of estrogen deprivation, and a positive correlation between ESR1 mutations and ER protein expression may exist.

High tumor mutation burden is associated with DNA damage repair gene mutation in breast carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy has demonstrated encouraging clinical benefits in patients with advanced breast carcinomas and Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression has been proposed as an immunotherapy biomarker. Challenges with current PD-L1 testing exist and tumor mutation burden (TMB) is emerging as a biomarker to predict clinical response to immunotherapy in melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer patients. However, TMB has not been well characterized in breast carcinomas. METHODS: The study cohort included 62 advanced breast cancer patients (13 primary and 49 metastatic). Genetic alterations and TMB were determined by FoundationOne CDx next generation sequencing (NGS) and the association with clinicopathologic features was analyzed. RESULTS: High TMB was observed in a relatively low frequency (3/62, 4.8%). TMB levels were positively associated tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and significantly higher TMB was observed in breast carcinomas with DNA damage repair gene mutation(s). There was no significant association between TMB levels and other analyzed clinicopathologic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate the importance of DNA damage repair proteins in maintaining DNA integrity and immune reaction and breast carcinoma patients with DDR mutation may benefit from immunotherapy.

BRAF V600E expression in histiocytic sarcoma associated with splenic marginal zone lymphoma: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Histiocytic sarcoma is a rare histiocytic neoplasm of unknown etiology that constitutes less than 1% of hematologic malignancies. A few cases of histiocytic sarcoma harboring the BRAF V600E mutation have been reported, but this finding has not been confirmed in all studies. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 63-year-old white woman with a history of splenic marginal zone lymphoma who presented with 2 weeks of right-sided neck swelling. Positron emission tomography revealed an intensely hypermetabolic and destructive soft tissue mass in her right skull base. A bone marrow biopsy was performed, which revealed an infiltrate of malignant cells characterized as large pleomorphic cells with frequent folded/irregular nuclei, variably prominent nucleoli, fine chromatin, and abundant amounts of eosinophilic cytoplasm. The malignant cells were positive for CD163, CD68 (granular), lysozyme (granular), CD4, and CD45 (partial). Based on the biopsy findings, she was diagnosed as having histiocytic sarcoma. The malignant cells tested positive for the BRAFV600E protein using immunohistochemistry. Before treatment of her histiocytic sarcoma could be initiated, she developed disseminated intravascular coagulation and acute hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema. She decided to pursue comfort care and died in our hospital 2 weeks following admission. CONCLUSIONS: Our case illustrates the aggressive nature of histiocytic sarcoma, and provides rare evidence that histiocytic sarcoma associated with indolent lymphomas may harbor the BRAF V600E mutation. Further research is needed to clarify the role of targeted therapies such as vemurafenib in the treatment of patients with this disorder.