Ultrasound for measurement of skeletal muscle mass quantity and muscle composition/architecture in critically ill patients: A scoping review on studies' aims, methods, and findings.

AIMS: This scoping review aimed to identify, explore, and map the objectives, methodological aspects, and results of studies that used ultrasound (US) to assess skeletal muscle (SM) in critically ill patients. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology. All studies that evaluated SM parameters from the US in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were considered eligible. We categorized muscle thickness and cross-sectional area as parameters for assessing SM quantity, while echogenicity, fascicle length, and pennation angle analysis were used to evaluate muscle "quality" (composition/architecture). A literature search was conducted using four databases for articles published until December 2022. Independent reviewers selected the studies and extracted data. Descriptive statistics were calculated to present the results. RESULTS: A total of 107 studies were included, the majority of which were prospective cohort studies (59.8 %) conducted in general ICUs (49.5 %). The most frequent objective of the studies was to evaluate SM quantity depletion during the ICU stay (25.2 %), followed by determining whether a specific intervention would modify SM (21.5 %). Most studies performed serial SM evaluations (76.1 %). The rectus femoris muscle thickness was evaluated in most studies (67.9 %), followed by the rectus femoris cross-sectional area (54.3 %) and the vastus intermedius muscle thickness (40.2 %). The studies demonstrated the feasibility and reproducibility of US for SM evaluation, especially related to quantitative parameters. Most studies (70.3 %) reported significant SM quantity depletion during hospitalization. However, the accuracy of the US in measuring SM varied across the studies. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of detailed description and standardization in the protocols adopted by the studies included in this scoping review precludes the translation of the evidence related to US for SM assessment into clinical practice.

Applicability of the SARC-F questionnaire by remote interview.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the applicability of the strength, assistance with walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls (SARC-F) questionnaire by telephone to identify sarcopenia risk (SR; SARC-F ≥6) and low muscle function risk (LMFR; SARC-F ≥ 4) and their associated risk factors in a cohort of community-dwelling older adults in southern Brazil. METHODS: A longitudinal study was carried out with community-dwelling older individuals from COMO VAI? STUDY: Sociodemographic, behavioral, and health-related information were collected at baseline, and, in the second assessment, the SARC-F questionnaire was applied by phone or in-person interviews. Older adults identified with sarcopenia at the baseline assessment were excluded. Adjusted analysis by Poisson regression according to hierarchical levels was performed. RESULTS: Of the 1451 participants interviewed at baseline, only 951 participated in the second assessment. During the second assessment, 732 adults (77%) were interviewed by phone and 219 (23%) in person. There was no statistically significant difference for the SR (9.1 versus 9.7%, P = 0.802) and LMFR (22.4 versus 20.0%, P = 0.435) prevalence when the SARC-F questionnaire was administered in person or by phone, respectively. Age ≥80 y, presence of depressive symptoms, multimorbidity, dependence to perform one or more daily activities, and polypharmacy were factors associated with a higher risk for poor outcomes in older adults interviewed by phone. CONCLUSIONS: The similar prevalence between in-person and remote assessments suggests the feasibility of using the SARC-F questionnaire by phone interview as a reliable alternative for sarcopenia and low muscle function risk assessment without the requirement of face-to-face evaluations.