Eastern Equine Encephalitis Virus: A Case Report and Brief Literature Review of Current Therapeutic and Preventative Strategies.

Background: Eastern equine encephalitis virus (EEEV) is a rare mosquito-borne illness exhibiting rapid neurological deterioration and permanent damage. Despite its >30% mortality and >60% long-term neurological damage, EEEV has no approved antiviral medication or vaccination. This report uniquely aims to describe a rare case of EEEV and provide a current literature review of therapeutic and preventative options from the clinical perspective to guide clinicians and public health workers, along with informing them about its impact and current knowledge gaps. Methods: A retrospective chart review of the electronic medical record was performed for a patient's 10-day hospital admission in July 2021. In addition, PubMed was searched using relevant keywords for a literature review of EEEV. Results: A 61-year-old woman presented with dysarthria and right-sided facial droop. Acute ischemic stroke was ruled out, and empiric intravenous (IV) antibiotics were initiated for possible infectious etiology. The patient developed worsening mental status and fever and was intubated, with antibiotics broadened with concern for meningitis along with tick-borne illness. The patient remained encephalopathic and febrile, and lumbar serologies were consistent with viral meningoencephalitis or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Several days after collection, quantitative antibody testing returned positive for EEEV. The patient was pronounced dead on hospital day 10. On review of the literature regarding EEEV, supportive care and prevention remain the cornerstone of management. Although early IV immunoglobulin and high-dose steroids have shown potential as treatments to reduce morbidity and mortality, no vaccines have been approved to date. Conclusion: Prospective trials and further investigations into treatment and preventative options may be useful in reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with EEEV.

Assessing Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy With the Modified Dundee Classification for Nonpurulent Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in a Community Hospital System.

Background: The modified Dundee classification has recently been validated in various studies for nonpurulent skin and soft tissue infections. This has yet to be applied in the United States and within community hospital settings to optimize antimicrobial stewardship and ultimately patient care. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive analysis was performed of 120 adult patients admitted to St. Joseph's/Candler Health System for nonpurulent skin and soft tissue infections between January 2020 and September 2021. Patients were classified into their modified Dundee classes, and frequencies of concordance of their empiric antimicrobial regimens with this classification scheme in the emergency department and inpatient settings were compared, along with possible effect modifiers and possible exploratory measures associated with concordance. Results: Concordance with the modified Dundee classification for the emergency department and inpatient regimens was 10% and 15%, respectively, with broad-spectrum antibiotic use and concordance positively associated with illness severity. Due to substantial broad-spectrum antibiotic use, possible effect modifiers associated with concordance were unable to be validated, and overall no statistically significant differences among exploratory analyses across classification status were observed. Conclusions: The modified Dundee classification can help identify gaps in antimicrobial stewardship and excessive broad-spectrum antimicrobial usage toward optimizing patient care.

Reintegrating droperidol into emergency medicine practice.

PURPOSE: After a long period of low utilization, droperidol has become easier to obtain in the US market. This comprehensive review discusses the safety, indications, clinical efficacy, and dosing of droperidol for use in the emergency department (ED) setting. SUMMARY: In 2001 the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) mandated a boxed warning in the labeling of droperidol after reports of QT interval prolongation associated with droperidol use. Since that time, it has been difficult to access droperidol in the United States; as a result, many practicing clinicians lack experience in its clinical use. Multiple studies have been conducted to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of droperidol use in ED patients. Results consistently show the safety of droperidol and its clinical efficacy when used as an analgesic, antiemetic, and sedative. Now that droperidol is more widely available for use in the US market, pharmacists and prescribers need to reliably translate safety and efficacy data compiled since 2001 to help ensure appropriate and effective use of the medication. CONCLUSION: Droperidol is an effective and safe option for the treatment of acute agitation, migraine, nausea, and pain for patients in the ED setting. Healthcare professionals can adopt droperidol for use in clinical practice, and they should become familiar with how to dose and monitor droperidol for safe and effective use.