Echocardiographic Evaluation of His Bundle Pacing in Patients with Prolonged PR Intervals.

Background: Patients with PR intervals >240ms have atrio-ventricular (AV) dyssynchrony, which can increase risk of atrial fibrillation and all-cause mortality. When requiring pacing, long AV delays (AVDs) have been programmed to avoid ventricular dyssychrony. His bundle pacing (HBP) may provide improved AV synchrony in patients with prolonged PR. Methods: 10 patients with sinus node dysfunction and prolonged PR who received HBP were studied. Real-time echocardiographic was performed with 3 pacemaker modes (RV septal, non-selective HBP, and selective HBP) using the following pacemaker settings: control (no ventricular pacing), pacing with AVD of 180ms, 150ms, 120ms, 100ms, and 70ms. Echocardiographic Doppler measurements: EA/RR, >40% = AV synchrony; E/e', <8 = normal left atrial pressure; pulmonic-to-aortic pre-ejection time difference, <40ms = interventricular synchrony; septal-to-lateral wall activation time difference, <56ms = intraventricular synchrony; and LVOT VTI. Unpaired T test was used to evaluate for significance. Exclusion criteria: persistent atrial fibrillation, second-degree AV block. Results: Compared to control programming, HBP showed a 31.5% increase in EA/RR time, a decrease in E/e' of 26.9%, and an increase in the LVOT VTI of 21.3%. Compared to RV septal pacing, there was a similar increase in LVOT VTI. These findings met statistical significance and were considered optimal based on Doppler echocardiography findings primarily at AVDs of 150ms and 120ms. Comparisons between selective and non-selective pacing were not significantly different. Conclusion: Compared to controls and RV septal pacing, physiologic His bundle pacing was shown to increase markers of AV synchrony and LV stroke volume while maintaining ventricular synchrony.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators with end stage renal disease: Nationwide inpatient sample database results.

BACKGROUND: When compared to patients with normal renal function, patients with chronic kidney disease develop higher in-hospital complications post implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. However, real world data on in-hospital complications post ICD therapy in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) is limited. In this study, we aim to explore the procedure-related complications of ICD therapy in patients with ESRD. METHODS: Using the nationwide inpatient sample (NIS) database, we conducted a retrospective analysis on ESRD patients who underwent inpatient ICD placement from 2010 to 2016. Using 1:2 propensity score matching, we compared ESRD patients to those with normal renal function. Outcomes of interest were postoperative hemorrhage and hematoma formation, blood transfusion, pericardial complications, mechanical complications requiring lead revision, vascular injury, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay. RESULTS: Our sample included 40,075 cases with subsequent propensity score matching between ESRD and normal renal function. Comparatively, patients with ESRD had higher odds of postoperative hemorrhage (Odds ratio [OR] = 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-1.99, p = < .0001), blood transfusion (OR, 3.88; CI 3.29-4.56; p = < .0001), mechanical complications requiring lead revision (OR, 1.24; CI 1.01-1.51; p = .035), vascular injury (OR, 2.02; CI 1.27-3.24; p = .0027), in-hospital mortality (OR, 4.56; CI 3.08-6.76; p = < .0001), and longer hospitalization (11 vs. 7 days, p = < .0001), but without significant difference in pericardial complications (OR, 1.9; CI 0.92-1.54; p = < .18). CONCLUSION: In this large contemporary cohort, patients with ESRD undergoing inpatient ICD therapy are at higher risk of developing postprocedural complications including hemorrhage and hematoma, blood transfusion, mechanical complications requiring lead revision, and in hospital mortality, without increased risk of pericardial complications.

Watchman outcomes comparing post-implantation anticoagulation with warfarin versus direct oral anticoagulants.

PURPOSE: As left atrial appendage occlusion devices (LAAO) implantation rates grow, continued evaluation on best patient practices is important. We report pooled Watchman outcomes at a multicenter Texas healthcare system with an emphasis on clinical outcomes and post-implantation anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin. METHODS: Data for 163 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing Watchman implantation was collected via retrospective chart review between June 2016 and June 2018. A Fisher's exact test was utilized to evaluate associations in bivariate comparisons of categorical data. Tests of non-inferiority, applied between DOACs and warfarin, utilized a ratio of 2. RESULTS: Outcomes were significant for similar rates of stroke, disabling stroke, major bleeds, and all-cause mortality when compared to published clinical trials. Most patients with cerebrovascular events were found to have >5 mm peri-device leaks (PDLs), were on warfarin at the time of the event (75%), and all occurred within the first 6 months post implant. A significant number of patients were discharged on DOACs (42%). DOACs were shown to be non-inferior to warfarin with respect to stroke (p = 0.0048), disabling stroke (p = 0.0383), gastrointestinal bleeding (p = 0.0287), mortality (p = 0.0165), and combined adverse outcomes (p = 0.0040). DOACs were associated with less combined adverse outcomes (p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that additional imaging or aggressive management of PDLs in Watchman recipients within the initial 6-month follow-up may aid in reducing stroke rates. Additionally, anticoagulation with DOACs' post Watchman implantation was found non-inferior to warfarin, with some evidence of lower risk for adverse outcomes favoring DOACs.

Inpatient Mortality and 30-Day Readmission Rates Associated with Troponin Testing in Patients without Acute Myocardial Infarction.

OBJECTIVE: Troponin values above the threshold established to diagnose acute myocardial infarction (AMI; >99th percentile) are commonly detected in patients with diagnoses other than AMI. The objective of this study was to compare inpatient mortality and 30-day readmission rate in patients with troponin I (TnI) above and below the 99th percentile in those with type 1 AMI and type 2 myocardial injury. METHODS: Between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016, there were 56,895 inpatient hospitalizations; of these 14,326 (25.2%) patients received troponin testing. We evaluated mortality and readmissions in the entire cohort based on the primary discharge International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition (ICD-10) diagnosis and grouped into type 1 AMI versus other diagnoses comprising the type 2 AMI group (including ICD-10 codes for congestive heart failure, sepsis, and other). Among those with TnI drawn, we evaluated in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmissions based on troponin values > 99th percentile (≥ 0.1 ng/ml). RESULTS: Among the entire cohort, the inpatient mortality rate was significantly higher in those with TnI testing (5.0%, 95% CI 4.6%-5.3%) compared to those without testing (0.7%, 95% CI 0.6%-0.7%, P < 0.01). In the tested cohort 3,743 (26%) patients had troponin levels above the 99th percentile (> 0.1 ng/ml), and 10,583 (74%) had troponin levels below the 99th percentile (≤ 0.1 ng/ml). Comparing type 2 AMI with type 1 AMI and troponin testing, TnI values ≥ 0.1 ng/ml were associated with higher inpatient mortality (11.6% vs. 3.9%) and 30-day readmission rates (16.9% vs. 10.7%). CONCLUSIONS: A higher inpatient mortality and 30-day readmission rates were found in patients with type 2 AMI compared to type 1 AMI group.