Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Med Educ ; 24(1): 808, 2024 Jul 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39075457

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Incorporating video as a tool for education offers a multitude of advantages. However, it is unknown what is the best educational tool to use for increasing public awareness, consequently reducing fear about root canal treatment. For this reason, this study aimed to compare the effectiveness of educational animation and leaflets as delivery methods for providing information on root canal treatment to patients and to assess their ability to retain the information. METHODS: One hundred fifty adult volunteers were recruited via social media and Umm Al-Qura University Dental Hospital to participate in this randomized control trial study. The volunteers were divided into the study group (SG) and the control group (CG). The SG was provided with information through animations created by the research team, while the CG received the same information through a leaflet. Pre-intervention (T1), immediate post-intervention (T2), and one-month post-intervention (T3) validated questionnaires were completed by the participants to assess the changes in their knowledge. To evaluate the impact of the information delivery method, the knowledge scores of T2 and T3 were compared to T1 within each group using Paired T-tests. Additionally, the study compared the knowledge scores of the two groups using unpaired T-tests. The significance level was set at a P-value of less than 0.05. RESULTS: A significant improvement in endodontic therapy knowledge among the participants in both groups (T1 compared to T2 in the same group) was noted (P < 0.050). However, when comparing T2 between groups, no significant difference was found in delivering the information and improving the knowledge (P = 0.080). Still, the mean differences between T1 and T2, as well as T1 and T3, were greater (P < 0.050) in the SG than in the CG. Furthermore, the total knowledge score in the SG at T3 was significantly higher than the CG. CONCLUSION: Both educational animation and leaflets are practical tools to increase patients' awareness about root canal treatment. However, educational videos are more effective than leaflets in delivering and retaining information about root canal treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered as a randomized control trial at the ISRCTN registry with the document number ISRCTN18413241, 15/05/2023.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Folhetos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Tratamento do Canal Radicular , Humanos , Tratamento do Canal Radicular/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Gravação em Vídeo
2.
Cureus ; 16(1): e51539, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38313935

RESUMO

Background Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a prominent sequela of rheumatic fever (RF) and the most common cause of acquired valvular disease worldwide. Patients develop RHD as a result of autoimmune reactions caused by an untreated group A Streptococcus (GAS) throat infection, resulting in significant valvular destruction. Objectives The current study aimed to assess the knowledge and attitude of RF and RHD among the Makkah city population in Saudi Arabia. Methods An observational cross-sectional study was conducted on a convenience sample of 1364 adult participants from Makkah city in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected through an online survey that was disseminated on different electronic platforms. Then, the obtained data were analyzed using SPSS version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). Results A total of 1364 participants completed the questionnaire; female participants constituted 58.1% (n = 792) and those between 18 and 30 years old represented 57.6% of the sample (n = 785). Knowledge of rheumatic fever was classified as poor (31.9%, n = 435), fair (44.8%, n = 611), and good (23.3%, n = 318). Female participants were shown to have better knowledge than males (p = 0.034). The attitude toward rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease was classified as negative (27.9%, n = 380), neutral (49.1%, n = 670), and positive (23%, n = 314). Conclusions This study concludes that adults in Makkah city, Saudi Arabia, have poor knowledge about RF and RHD. There is a notable gap in their knowledge regarding the association between sore throat and RF, bacterial dermatitis and RF, the common age for RF, and the necessity of using antibiotics appropriately to prevent this disease. The study also revealed negative attitudes toward RF and RHD among Makkah citizens, but most of them recommended health education campaigns to increase public awareness about this important disease. The results of this study will assist in the development of awareness campaigns about RF and RHD. Finally, qualitative studies are recommended to fully understand what the population perceives about this morbidity.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA