Assessment of Suvorexant and Eszopiclone as Alternatives to Benzodiazepines for Treating Insomnia in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the utility of switching from benzodiazepines to suvorexant or eszopiclone to manage benzodiazepine-unresponsive insomnia in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) in a randomized, open-label study. METHODS: Patients with MDD who have insomnia symptoms (a score of >7 on the Insomnia Severity Index Japanese version [ISI-J]), who had received benzodiazepine treatment for more than 2 weeks (n = 18) were randomized to 4 weeks of suvorexant (20 or 15 mg/d) or eszopiclone (3 or 2 mg/d) treatment. The primary endpoint was an improvement in insomnia severity from baseline assessed by the ISI-J score at 2 and 4 weeks after switching from benzodiazepines. The secondary endpoints included changes in the scores of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Japanese version, the Beck Depression Inventory II, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7, the digit span test, and the digit symbol substitution test from baseline. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: Patients taking suvorexant or eszopiclone had improved ISI-J scores (-4.3 for suvorexant and -4.1 for eszopiclone at week 4; P = 0.04 for eszopiclone). Both drugs tended to improve the Beck Depression Inventory II and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 scores 2 and 4 weeks after switching. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Japanese version, digit symbol substitution test, and digit span test scores and the incidence of adverse events did not change from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to suvorexant or eszopiclone was well tolerated and improved the severity of benzodiazepine-unresponsive insomnia in MDD patients. Both drugs could be beneficial alternatives to benzodiazepines for treating insomnia in MDD patients.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Once-Daily Tacrolimus Compared With Twice-Daily Tacrolimus in the Early Stage After Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus using the once-daily (OD) formulation in the early stage after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in comparison with those using the twice-daily (TD) formulation. METHODS: Nine patients undergoing primary LDLT and treated with the OD tacrolimus formulation were included. The trough blood concentration (C0) of tacrolimus was monitored every day for 3 weeks after LDLT. A time course study of the blood tacrolimus concentrations and calcineurin (CN) phosphatase activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was performed 3 weeks after LDLT. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were compared with previously reported data using the TD formulation. RESULTS: The interindividual variability in the daily dose of tacrolimus was significantly larger in the OD formulation than in the TD formulation (P < 0.001). In the time course study, the tacrolimus blood concentrations at 4, 8, and 12 hours after administration and the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24) in the OD group were significantly higher than in the TD group, although the C0 was equivalent. In addition, the C0 was not significantly correlated with the AUC0-24 in the OD formulation. The apparent clearance and the pharmacodynamic parameters examined were not significantly different between the OD and TD groups. CONCLUSIONS: The C0 monitoring of the OD formulation may not be optimal in patients at the early stage after LDLT because the C0 was not correlated with the AUC0-24. If clinicians target the same C0 using the OD and TD formulations, the exposure of tacrolimus can be higher in the OD formulation, and excessive immunosuppression should be noted. Particular attention should be paid to the patients in the early stage after LDLT in the use of the OD oral formulation of tacrolimus.

[Effect of Water Intake on Allergy-like Events Associated with Non-ionic Iodine Contrast Agents].

The use of iodine contrast agents occasionally causes serious allergic symptoms including anaphylaxis. At Kyoto University Hospital to prevent nephropathy we began recommending water intake before and after administration of iodine contrast agents in September 2012. In the present study we investigated the effect of water intake on the incidence of allergy-like events after the use of non-ionic iodine contrast agents. We extracted the occurrence of allergy-like events from the incident report system in our hospital from January 2011 to September 2014, and classified these events into the following 3 grades: 1+ (follow-up); 2+ (medication treatment); and 3+ (hospitalization). The allergy-like incidence rate was calculated for subsequent evaluation according to season and water intake. Allergy-like events significantly decreased from 0.49% before the recommendation of water intake to 0.26% at 1 year and 0.20% at 2 years after implementing the recommendation. The incidence of allergy-like events was significantly higher in summer than in winter before water intake was recommended. After implementing the recommendation, the value for summer significantly decreased to an incidence similar to that of winter. Respiratory and gastrointestinal allergy-like symptoms were dramatically decreased after implementing the recommendation. Water intake may be useful for preventing allergy-like events associated with non-ionic iodine contrast agents, especially during the summer.

Comparison of the effects of azole antifungal agents on the anticoagulant activity of warfarin.

The package insert of the antithrombotic agent warfarin warns users of its interaction with azole antifungals. However, information on the frequency or degree of these interactions is limited. In particular, the time to onset of azole-mediated prothrombin time prolongation, expressed as the international normalized ratio (INR), is poorly characterized. Therefore, we retrospectively examined the INR in 29 patients administered warfarin with fluconazole (FLCZ), voriconazole (VRCZ), or itraconazole (ITCZ). INRs in 18 patients taking FLCZ and in 5 patients taking VRCZ significantly increased from 1.40 to 2.94 and from 1.95 to 2.89, respectively. The warfarin sensitivity index (WSI), calculated as INR/daily warfarin dose, also significantly increased from 1.06 to 1.89 with FLCZ and showed an upward trend from 1.13 to 2.23 with VRCZ. ITCZ had no influence on the INR or WSI in 6 patients. The INRs observed when warfarin was coadministered with azoles (Y) correlated significantly with those observed in the absence of azoles (X): FLCZ, Y=4.94X-3.96, r(2)=0.80; VRCZ, Y=2.13X-1.27, r(2)=0.93. Moreover, in all 8 patients with closely monitored INRs, the WSI increased within 1 week of FLCZ or VRCZ coadministration. In conclusion, FLCZ and VRCZ augmented the anticoagulant activity of warfarin. The INR should be closely monitored within 1 week of initiating FLCZ or VRCZ coadministration with warfarin, especially in patients with high INRs.

Delayed effect of grapefruit juice on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in a living-donor liver transplant recipient.

Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor that has been widely used to prevent allograft rejection after transplantation. We report a case of a living-donor liver transplant recipient experiencing a considerable increase in the trough blood concentration of tacrolimus after concomitant ingestion of grapefruit juice (250 mL) 4 times for 3 days. The trough blood concentrations of tacrolimus were not changed during or immediate after the repeated intake of grapefruit juice. However, almost 1 week after the final ingestion, the blood concentration of tacrolimus markedly increased to as much as 47.4 ng/mL from 4.7 ng/mL before the ingestion, resulting in a profound reduction of calcineurin phosphatase activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Furthermore, headache and nausea, but not nephrotoxicity or hyperglycemia, took place throughout the period of the elevated blood concentrations. Grapefruit juice may have a clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus. It is recommended to avoid the consumption of grapefruit juice in transplant recipients treated with tacrolimus.

Intestinal MDR1/ABCB1 level at surgery as a risk factor of acute cellular rejection in living-donor liver transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Although the prevention of immunologic reactions with sufficient immunosuppression prolongs graft and patient survival rates, the large interindividual variation in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics interferes with treatment. In this study we have examined whether intestinal MDR1 (ABCB1) is a potential biomarker predicting the occurrence of acute cellular rejection, as well as a factor to predict absorption of tacrolimus, after living-donor liver transplantation. METHODS: By use of tissue specimens of intestinal mucosa (n = 164) obtained at surgery, the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression of intestinal MDR1 and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 was quantified. RESULTS: The probability of acute cellular rejection during the first 10 days after surgery was significantly associated with the average trough concentration of tacrolimus between postoperative days 2 and 4 (45.1% for <7 ng/mL versus 22.9% for >7 ng/mL,P= .0040). High levels of MDR1 were associated with an episode of acute cellular rejection before postoperative day 10 (odds ratio, 2.306 [95% confidence interval, 1.058-5.028]) and with a poor survival rate during the first postoperative year (odds ratio, 7.413 [95% confidence interval, 1.567-36.073]). The mRNA expression level of MDR1 was inversely correlated with the tacrolimus concentration-oral dose ratio during the initial 4 days after surgery in patients with a graft-to-recipient weight ratio greater than 1.5 (r= -0.6798, P< .0001) and those with a graft-to-recipient weight ratio of less than 1.5 (r= -0.7180, P< .0001). CONCLUSION: The enterocyte MDR1 mRNA level was suggested to be a risk factor for acute cellular rejection and death after surgery. Therefore obtaining a sufficient tacrolimus blood level via this molecular information-based initial dosage adjustment may enable the episode of acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation to be reduced.

Pharmacodynamic analysis of tacrolimus and cyclosporine in living-donor liver transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: The calcineurin inhibitors tacrolimus and cyclosporine (INN, ciclosporin) have been widely used to prevent allograft rejection after transplantation. We investigated pharmacodynamic properties of the 2 drugs and their clinical relevance in liver transplantation. METHODS: Forty de novo living-donor liver transplant patients participated in this study, and they were treated with either tacrolimus (N = 30) or cyclosporine (N = 10). We simultaneously measured blood drug concentrations and calcineurin phosphatase activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells during the first 14 postoperative days. Nephrotoxicity and acute rejection were also examined in relation to the blood drug concentrations and calcineurin activity. RESULTS: Calcineurin activity was only partially inhibited by tacrolimus concentrations greater than 20 ng/mL, although it could be almost completely inhibited by cyclosporine concentrations greater than 700 ng/mL. According to a maximum effect model, the population mean estimates of the EC(50) (blood concentration that yields a half-maximal effect) for tacrolimus and cyclosporine were 26.4 ng/mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.7-37.1 ng/mL) and 200 ng/mL (95% CI, 127-274 ng/mL), respectively. Patients with nephrotoxicity in both groups had significantly higher trough concentrations compared with those without this adverse event. In addition, patients with acute rejection in the tacrolimus group had significantly lower trough concentrations and higher calcineurin activity than those without a rejection episode. CONCLUSIONS: The inhibitory effects on calcineurin activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells differed between tacrolimus and cyclosporine in living-donor liver transplant patients. Pharmacodynamic assessment in combination with blood concentration monitoring may be useful for determining the individual therapeutic range of tacrolimus and cyclosporine.

Forecasting of blood tacrolimus concentrations based on the Bayesian method in adult patients receiving living-donor liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Bayesian prediction of blood tacrolimus concentrations in adult patients receiving living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using previously obtained population pharmacokinetic parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from 47 adult patients receiving LDLT who were not included in the estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters. Blood tacrolimus concentrations were predicted without or with the empirical Bayesian method using sparse samples obtained in the previous week. Predictive performance of the concentrations was evaluated by the mean prediction error (ME), mean absolute prediction error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) as well as the percentage of successful predictions (percentage of absolute prediction error less than 3 microg/L, %PRED3). RESULTS: Concentrations predicted by the population mean pharmacokinetic parameter values coincided well with observed concentrations during the period of tacrolimus infusion immediately after the operation. For concentrations during subsequent oral therapy with tacrolimus, predictability by the population mean pharmacokinetic parameter values alone was not satisfactory. Bayesian forecasting using one or two blood concentrations obtained in the previous week significantly decreased (p<0.05) MAE and RMSE compared with predictions based on the population mean pharmacokinetic parameters on postoperative days 21 and 28, but not on day 14. During postoperative days 15-21, %PRED3 was increased to 68.6% or 71.2% with the Bayesian method using one or two blood concentrations, respectively, from 44.9% with the population mean pharmacokinetic parameter values. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated the applicability of the Bayesian method with use of one or two samples for prediction of blood tacrolimus concentrations in adult patients receiving LDLT.